Hello Jose,
Thanks for your message and for your magnificent work. I suppose
there are many more volunteers like you. The work you have done
ís
outstanding, to say the least!
So, if I understand correctly, even for those batch numbers that are
already published on the IGI database, is it possible that you might
have skipped one or more of those illegible entries? How frequently
are you faced with a situation like this?
Well, that means that even if we haven't found a particular record on
the IGI there's still hope that we could find it in the microfilm
itself. And that goes also for the records in those microfilms that
haven't been captured yet, of course.
Anyway, back to the original question. Do you have an idea, just an
approximation about the percentage of films that have already been
transcribed to the IGI?
Thanks again!
Victor
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "zendean" wrote:
> Joseph; Yes, I am one of the those volunteers that
does