Description

These forum posts are from the old “Ranchos Archives” which was part of a Yahoo Groups system that operated between 2003-2006. This was a hybrid of electronic mailing lists and internet message boards. The files are “Read Only” and many of the users of the Yahoo Groups are not part of the new NuestrosRanchos membership, so keep this in mind when viewing these message posts and replies.

Huejucar!!! Part two

Just a word on DNA tests for females...of course they can be done.
Females have DNA just like males. But remember from your chapter on
Genetics in your Biology class, females have XX chromosomes and males
have XY chromosomes. Male haploid reproductive cells (sperm cells) are
either X or Y chromosome cells. Female haploid (or ova) are ALL
X-chromosome cells. When an X sperm cell fertilizes a X ovum, a baby
girl is conceived. When a Y sperm cell fertilizes an X ovum, a baby
boy is conceived. That is why males determine the sex of the newborn
child.


As Joseph, and anyone else who has investigated their genetic
genealogy, can attest to, paternal origin can only be checked via the
Y-DNA only. Consequently, only males can have their Y-DNA traced,
because only males have the Y-chromosome (which is where the Y-DNA is
located). Unfortunately, females are XX and have no Y-DNA, so females
have to ask a close male relative (father, brother, or paternal-cousin)
if they want

Huejucar!!!

Hi Joseph,

I'm so happy for you. This is truly a wonderful break. You indeed
have the right forensic attitude for genealogy. Establish what you
know and what you don't know, and formulate parameters for your future
research. I wish you the best of luck.


My mother is a Lopez, whose ancestry was from San Miguel el Alto and
San Juan de los Lagos, Jalisco. It is very very unlikely that our two
Lopezes were related, as the surname is sooooo common, but wouldn't it
be cool if they were?


Tell us all when you make some more progress.

Steven H.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Puentes 
To: LosRanchos 
Sent: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:16:58 -0500
Subject: [ranchos] Huejucar!!!


I'm soooooo excited. I just got off the phone with my 2nd cousin Roy
Raygoza from Antioch, CA. Seems that his grandfather, Nicolas was
brother to my Grandmother, Antonia Lopez. The big big big news is that
his parents are from Huejucar, Jalisco the same place he

Relationships in Spanish

Joseph,

Among the people I know, it is common to hear about "Abuelos",
"Bisabuelos" and "Tatarabuelos".  Beyond that, I've never heard those
greek prefixes like tetra, penta, hexa, etc. attached to the word
"abuelo" but rather the ordinal numbers cuarto, quinto, sexto, etc. or
its numerical equivalent 4to., 5to., 6to., etc.

However, there's some confusion on the numbering system depending on
if you're counting the "abuelos" or the "bisabuelos".  For example, my
genealogy software (In English) uses the following nomenclature, which
I have paired with its Spanish equivalent:

Grandparent = Abuelo
Great Grandparent = Bisabuelo or 2do. Abuelo
2nd. Great Grandparent = Tatarabuelo or 3er. Abuelo or 2do. Bisabuelo
3rd. Great Grandparent = 4to. Abuelo or 3er. Bisabuelo
And so on.

The convention in Spanish is to count the "abuelos", but if you're
doing a translation of, let's say, 3rd. Great Grandparent you have to
be careful and translate it either as 3er. Bisabuelo or 4to. Abuelo.

 I hope

PLACING RELATIVES





Emilie Garcia wrote:

OK, then, Joseph,
 
How do you write and pronounce all those subsequent
generations:   primera, secunda, tercera,  (I don't know how to say the
rest).  Also, why is pentabuelo listed as antepasado de 6th generation
when "pent" means "five" to me.  It looks like the pentabuelo should go
with "5th". 

well if you look at it in the Spanish the father is the first
generation, the grandfather is the 1st grandfather but the 2nd
generation, the g-Grandfather is the 2nd grandfather (Bis) but the 3rd
generation, the GG grandfather is the 3rd grandfather (Tatara) but the
4th generation, etc.



I would like more feedback from the group is these designations are
being currently used in Mexico? I mean I talked with Luz Montejano and
she seemed to indicate that this was the old style and not in current
use. Then again maybe I didn't quite understand correctly.



joseph


Thanks,
 
Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA --
-----

Specific Huejucar Film info


Does anyone know if the Huejucar films in the later years (say in the
1880's) are indexed? I know that in the neighboring area of Santa Maria
de los Angeles that after the 1830's (approx.) or so that the priests
started indexing their records.


thanks,

joseph



DNA: Huejucar!!! Part two

yes but that would be the Mt-DNA which would trace you through your
mom, grandmother, great grandmother etc. so that wouldn't help in us
comparing our Muro line. We'd need your father or brother or uncle or
nephew from one of your brothers. Basically any male child who wears
the Muro name as his true surname.



thanks,



joseph



Carol Turner wrote:

I will talk to my dad again about this.  Don't they do
DNA tests yet on females?

--- Joseph Puentes  wrote:

  
Thanks Prima,

I haven't heard from you lately. Just thinking about
you as I was 
organizing some of our Muro Records. I'm trying to
get my mess into some 
kind of a reasonable pile. Thanks again. I'm trying
to find a Muro from 
my line of Muro's to consider DNA testing. Any
Muro's on your side that 
might be good candidates?

joseph

ps:  Not sure of the time frame but there are films
for that area of 
Huejucar back to 1765:

Title
Registros parroquiales, 1765-1973

Authors
Iglesia Católica. San Francisco

Huejucar!!! Part two

I will talk to my dad again about this.  Don't they do
DNA tests yet on females?

--- Joseph Puentes  wrote:

> Thanks Prima,
> 
> I haven't heard from you lately. Just thinking about
> you as I was 
> organizing some of our Muro Records. I'm trying to
> get my mess into some 
> kind of a reasonable pile. Thanks again. I'm trying
> to find a Muro from 
> my line of Muro's to consider DNA testing. Any
> Muro's on your side that 
> might be good candidates?
> 
> joseph
> 
> ps:  Not sure of the time frame but there are films
> for that area of 
> Huejucar back to 1765:
> 
> Title
> Registros parroquiales, 1765-1973
> 
> Authors
> Iglesia Católica. San Francisco de Asís (Huejúcar,
> Jalisco) (Main Author)
> 
> Notes
> Microfilme de manuscritos en el archivo de la
> parroquia.
> Algunos de los libros incluyen índice.
> Parish registers of baptisms, confirmations,
> marriages and marriage 
> petitions, and deaths from Huejúcar, Jalisco,
> Mexico.
> 
> Subjects
> Mexico, Jalisco

Huejucar!!! Part two

Thanks Prima,



I haven't heard from you lately. Just thinking about you as I was
organizing some of our Muro Records. I'm trying to get my mess into
some kind of a reasonable pile. Thanks again. I'm trying to find a Muro
from my line of Muro's to consider DNA testing. Any Muro's on your side
that might be good candidates?



joseph



ps:  Not sure of the time frame but there are films for that area of
Huejucar back to 1765:


Title

Registros parroquiales, 1765-1973

Authors

Iglesia Católica. San Francisco de Asís (Huejúcar, Jalisco) (Main
Author)

Notes

Microfilme de manuscritos en el archivo de la parroquia.

Algunos de los libros incluyen índice.

Parish registers of baptisms, confirmations, marriages and marriage
petitions, and deaths from Huejúcar, Jalisco, Mexico.

Subjects

Mexico, Jalisco, Huejúcar - Church records

Format

Manuscript (On Film)

Language

Spanish

Publication

Salt Lake City, Utah : Filmados por la Sociedad Geneal�gica de
Utah, 1962, 1978

Physical

102 carretes

Huejucar!!! Part two

Jospeh that is wonderful news.  The only family
connection from that area would be my
great-grandmother Francisca Carrillo who was from that
area; she married Casmiro Muro.   However I found her
baptism and marriage record in Santa Maria and
Colotlan.  Francisca was born in the early 1840's;
it's possible Huejucar didn't have a church until
after that time-frame?  I wish you good-luck, at this
time I don't have any films from Huejucar.  

Carol Turner

--- Santos Luna  wrote:

> I share your joy.....now go... and take on those
> films!!!
> Cheers/Helyn
> 
> Joseph Puentes  wrote:
> 
> I'm soooooo excited. I just got off the phone with
> my 2nd cousin Roy Raygoza from Antioch, CA. Seems
> that his grandfather, Nicolas was brother to my
> Grandmother, Antonia Lopez. The big big big news is
> that his parents are from Huejucar, Jalisco the same
> place he says that my grandmother is from. That
> being said I'm off to the races again inserarch of
> this line

PLACING RELATIVES

OK, then, Joseph,
 
How do you write and pronounce all those subsequent
generations:   primera, secunda, tercera,  (I don't know how to
say the rest).  Also, why is pentabuelo listed as antepasado de 6th
generation when "pent" means "five" to me.  It looks like the pentabuelo
should go with "5th".  I did like the list though since it tells me what
comes after abuelo and bisabuelo, etc which I didn't know before.
 
Thanks,
 
Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA --
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 5:04
PM
Subject: Re: [ranchos] PLACING
RELATIVES

my email address is makas@...r.com
but just call me Joseph because makas means scissors and isn't my
name.

As far as I know there isn't any generally accepted alternative
to the Grandfather, Great Grandfather, Great Great Grandfather, etc
designations.

there is this in spanish:

http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Prairie/7215