WildCards ???

I'm trying to get the hang of Using WildCards in doing searches on
www.familysearch.org

I'm very thankful to Victor Villarreal for the great tutorial on
WildCards to be found in the "Files" under "Reference Material" under

Comments

Comment

Many of the wild card searches work when you enter a batch number. For
example, when I use the batch where you are getting all of your results
and simply enter "Puentes" for the father's last name, I get the
following. Victoriana is certainly their daughter... the old Jose and
Maria thing. I always check using Jose for the father and using Maria
for the mother. Amazing how often that brings up more children.

You searched for: Mexico
Father: Puente
Exact Spelling: Off
Batch Number: M611046
[refine search]
Prepare selected records for download

International Genealogical Index / Mexico - 9
Select records to download - (50 maximum)
1. VICTORIANA PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 03 JUN 1835 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

2. BONIFACIO PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 28 JAN 1853 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

3. FELICIANA PUENTES - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 14 FEB 1849 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

4. JOSE MARIA PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Marriage: 03 NOV 1847 Santa Maria De Los Angeles, Jalisco,
Mexico

5. MARIA GENARA PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 04 JUL 1832 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

6. MARIA DEL REFUGIA PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 26 FEB 1835 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

7. MARIA SALOME PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 21 APR 1849 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

8. CECILIO PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Marriage: 17 MAY 1843 Santa Maria De Los Angeles, Jalisco,
Mexico

9. MARIA CONCEPCION PUENTE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Marriage: 15 MAY 1844 Santa Maria De Los Angeles,
Jalisco, Mexico

-----Original Message-----
From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Puentes
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 6:12 PM
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] WildCards ???

I'm trying to get the hang of Using WildCards in doing searches on
www.familysearch.org

Comment

Joseph,

Not all search expressions produce results. Sometimes you need to learn by
trail and error.
Try this: Firstname = %, Lastname = Puente, Mother = Eduarda, Region
=Mexico;

Victor

On 4/22/06, Joseph Puentes wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to get the hang of Using WildCards in doing searches on
> www.familysearch.org
>
>

Digitized LDS Films Online

I was told this morning by a Mormon Elder that the digitizing of the films in the Salt Lake City Repository is proceeding well. A process begun two years ago.

He told me that the first digitized films will be online shortly, and that they will be closing many Family History Centers, consolidating them since everything will be online soon. The remaining consolidated FHC's will be mostly for people without Internet access.

Comments

Comment

Nathan,

Thanks for that information, now where do we go or who do we contact to volunteer for the Spanish speakers and readers of documents for the digitizing project.

Thanks,
Alicia Carrillo,
San Jose, Ca

NathanJones wrote:

I was told this morning by a Mormon Elder that the digitizing of the films in the Salt Lake City Repository is proceeding well. A process begun two years ago.

He told me that the first digitized films will be online shortly, and that they will be closing many Family History Centers, consolidating them since everything will be online soon. The remaining consolidated FHC's will be mostly for people without Internet access.

I was informed that the second Beta testing of the new software to view the films is nearing a successful conclusion.

I was told volunteers are needed who read Spanish to help index the digitized films. If you volunteer you can work from your home.

He said it took twenty years to index the 1880 census, so the indexing of the huge LDS film collection will take longer than the actual digital filiming.

I could not pin him down on how soon is soon, but I would not be surprised to see original documents online later this year.

This will of course, be an incredible leap forward for our purposes, and genealogy in general.

Comment

That is great news. I too have been told that they plan on closing down a lot of the family history centers soon. My local FHC recently got a whole new set of state of the art computers and wired for high speed internet access... presumably so that the films online will be accessible to patrons.

I did not realize that they would be rolling out the digital films so quickly. I imagine that the polyester films (and corresponding ordering process from the FHCs) will still be needed for a few years until they finish the filming process.

Does anybody know if they will be using the same indexing format as currently exists for films (IGI or VRI)? If so, which one? If not, what improvements or changes will be made to the indices?

Comment

The LDS has a status just below a Family History Center that has no Internet access but retains its collection of films.

They were considering downgrading the Hacienda Heights FHC in the San Gabriel Valley in suburban Los Angeles where I go about half a year ago. But reconsidered and left it a FHC for the time being.

They might consolidate films at other regional respositories at some point. I'm sure there's plenty of changes coming that we can't anticipate yet.

It was the LDS that began genetic testing as well, but unfortunately they sold off that entire field.

It would have been doubly potent to match online genetic and genealogical records.
The prospects stagger the mind!

Who would be better at getting a sample of Moctezuma's DNA than the Mormons?

When I was a social worker in the mid 1970s I remember requesting birth records from Utah, and getting back a rather unpleasant response. "We don't issue birth certificates on illegits!"

The only state that had that policy that I knew of. They've come a long way since then.

Mexico has always been one of the LDS's strongest interests. So I would guess they would have the films we need online rather rapidly.

Comment

Arturo,

They are closing my local FHC here in Port Orchard, WA at the end of the month. All the films I had on permanent hold will be sent back to Salt Lake. There are three other FHC's on this island, but they are only a third as large as the one here. I am afraid that they will close them all and keep only the ones in Tacoma and Seattle open. I would have to cross bridges over water or take ferries to get there. I haven't heard the final decision yet. Boo hoo. I felt like they told me there would be no more Christmas.

Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA ---

Comment

Emilie Garcia wrote:

They are closing my local FHC here in Port Orchard, WA at the end of the month.

Emily and others, does that mean that if they have not announced the closing of your LOCAL FHC, that it will not be closing soon? I have films at the Fremont FHC that I have not viewed yet and some of the first films I had ordered last year ,that I need to review again because I know I missed family names that I did not know were family at the time.

Boo hoo. I felt like they told me there would be no more Christmas. Emily I join you in mourning for the loss of these centers and here comes the but...........But maybe it will be better on-line. My wish is that the records be recorded verbatim, word for word , warts and all so that nothing will be lost.

Alicia Carrillo,
San Jose, Ca

Comment

They explained the digitizing process to me in detail. They are stretching out an entire film and taking a digital picture of that. So if part of the film slips, they have to start over.

It would be impossible to go back to the original documents and film them directly as they are still in their original repositories around the world. Many have been destroyed since their filming by one natural disaster, or another.

So what we will be seeing is a picture of the film for documents already on file. And probably direct digital photos of new documents coming into LDS possession.

What is odd is that they increased the price of the old films so sharply, almost doubled the borrowing charge just as they are about to make the films obsolete.

Comment

erniealderete@charter.net wrote:

>They explained the digitizing process to me in detail. They are stretching out an entire film and taking a digital picture of that. So if part of the film slips, they have to start over.
>
>It would be impossible to go back to the original documents and film them directly as they are still in their original repositories around the world. Many have been destroyed since their filming by one natural disaster, or another.
>
>So what we will be seeing is a picture of the film for documents already on file. And probably direct digital photos of new documents coming into LDS possession.
>
>What is odd is that they increased the price of the old films so sharply, almost doubled the borrowing charge just as they are about to make the films obsolete.
>
I was talking to another volunteer at my FHC and we speculated that the
LDS library is trying to "Slow down" the rental of the films so they can
put their manpower and effort into the digitizing project. I don't know,
just a guess. But whereas before I was freely ordering films now I
really think about it before I order. the increased definitely slowed me
down. I'm hoping that if it takes 6 years to do the whole library that
it will be in the first 3 years when they do the Colotlan and
Tlaltenango and Zacatecas and the and the and the films

joseph

Comment

Alicia,

I believe that the decision to close FHCs will depend on each stake's needs to reassign the use of their spaces. In the case here in town, the ever-growing numbers of new members in the congregations in Tacoma on the other side of the Narrows Bridge caused the need to create another stake and house it in the current building on this side in this county, and creating a need for space for more meeting rooms, etc. I think that the digitizing project made it easier to make the decision to downgrade the need for an FHC here. The teardown will start on May 1, and remodeling plans have been made and equipment, etc has been ordered, etc. Those of us who have many films on permanent loan are working feverishly on our films every day that we can get a volunteer member in. We have been going in every day except Sundays. We drag in early every morning and take breaks only for lunch. With only six more days to go, we can see we won't finish our films before they are sent back to Sal
t Lake.
It has been a tedious enough thing to have gone in three days a week for six years, but more so now that the push is on. Oh, well, it was nice while it lasted.

Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA ---

Comment

thanks. Here is a related link that I think is a search engine for the
material they already have finished. Not much there for Mexico yet, but
I did notice they have a survey. Maybe if we all did the survey and said
"Do Jalisco, Zacatecas, and Aguascalientes First, please" that we might
be able to get some attention to our wishes.

http://www.lib.byu.edu/fhc/ (search engine---try putting in Mexico under
"search all")

http://express.perseus.com/perseus/surveys/1734848031/6a0e74ac.htm (survey)

I hope they don't close my FHC as I have about many films on permanent
hold and the nostalgia of rolling a film will be something I'll always
remember. Especially thinking back to those times my heart was doing
backflips when I found my grandparents and great grandparents and my ggg
grandmother, Eduarda Torres Marquez' death certificate.

joseph

NathanJones wrote:

>I was told this morning by a Mormon Elder that the digitizing of the films in the Salt Lake City Repository is proceeding well. A process begun two years ago.
>
>He told me that the first digitized films will be online shortly, and that they will be closing many Family History Centers, consolidating them since everything will be online soon. The remaining consolidated FHC's will be mostly for people without Internet access.
>
>I was informed that the second Beta testing of the new software to view the films is nearing a successful conclusion.
>
>I was told volunteers are needed who read Spanish to help index the digitized films. If you volunteer you can work from your home.
>
>He said it took twenty years to index the 1880 census, so the indexing of the huge LDS film collection will take longer than the actual digital filiming.
>
>I could not pin him down on how soon is soon, but I would not be surprised to see original documents online later this year.
>
>This will of course, be an incredible leap forward for our purposes, and genealogy in general.

Just a thought

Is there a possibility of adding a live "chat" service to exchange thoughts among the members? Francisco

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low

Comments

Comment

I'm not sure how Yahoo messenger works, but can't you have a chat
through Messenger with a group?

We'd need to announce it and plan on a good time. but I don't see why we
can't try to get a chat going. I'm not a chat person, but will try it a
few times and if others in the group want to get in on it that will be
great.

joseph

ps: what about Saturday Night at 7 pm Pacific Time

francisco sevilla wrote:

>Is there a possibility of adding a live "chat" service to exchange thoughts among the members? Francisco
>
>

Comment

nomas los que tienen interes del grupo pueden entrar al Chat. El chat es
independente del grupo

para el Grupo:

quiene tiene interes en Chat el Sabado a las 7 pm tiempo Pacifico?

joseph

ps: Anyone else interested in Chatting on Saturday night at 7 pm pacific
time on Saturday?

We'll be using Yahoo Messenger to Chat.

I don't have an agenda so we'll not be depending on me to carry the
chat. . .I'm not a very chatty person

If you are interested you need to send me your Yahoo ID and you also
need to have Yahoo Messenger installed on your computer.

francisco sevilla wrote:

> Joseph si tengo el messenger de Yahoo. Pero como podremos usarlo en
> grupo? Hay alguna manera de afregarnos mutuamente?
>
> Joseph Puentes wrote:
>
>
> Francisco,
>
> Tienes el Yahoo Messenger en su computadora?
>
> lo vamos a necesitar el Sabado para hacer el Chat.
>
> joseph
>
>
> francisco sevilla wrote:
>
>>7:00 pm Pacific time ok with me --- Joseph Puentes wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not sure how Yahoo messenger works, but can't you have a chat through Messenger with a group? We'd need to announce it and plan on a good time. but I don't see why we can't try to get a chat going. I'm not a
>>> chat person, but will try it a few times and if others in the group want to get in on it that will be great. joseph ps: what about Saturday Night at 7 pm Pacific Time francisco sevilla wrote:
>>>
>>>>Is there a possibility of adding a live "chat"
>>>>
>>>service to exchange thoughts among the members? Francisco
>>>
>>>>
>>>>

WorldCat ???

Who in CA has access to WorldCat? Please look up this ISBN number
(below) and send me the list of California Libraries that carry the
book. My access to WorldCat for some reason only gives a partial list of

Comments

Comment

Moctezuma's children : Aztec royalty under Spanish rule, 1520-1700 by Donald E Chipman

Type: English : Book
Publisher: Austin : University of Texas Press, 2005.
ISBN: 0292706286
OCLC: 57134288

Subjects: Montezuma -- II, -- Emperor of Mexico, -- ca. 1480-1520 -- Genealogy. | Moctezuma, Isabel, -- 1509-1550 -- Genealogy. | Aztecs -- Kings and rulers -- Genealogy. | More ...
Bookmark | Permalink

Libraries Details Subjects Editions Reviews
[input] [input] [input] Enter Location Information: [input] [input] Enter postal code, state, province or country
Narrow Your Results by Format: Display All FormatsBookInternet Resource Choose Library Proximity: Worldwide
Displaying Libraries 1-10 out of 12 for Worldwide First Prev 1 2 Next Last
1. Livermore Public Library
Livermore, CA 94550 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
2. University of Texas Health Science Center at San A
San Antonio, TX 78229 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
3. University of Texas Syst Telecampus Library
Austin, TX 78713 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
4. University of Texas at Arlington
Arlington, TX 76019 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
Services:
Ask a librarian
5. University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78713
Book
Other Formats:
Internet Resource
Services:
Ask a librarian
6. University of Texas at El Paso
El Paso, TX 79968
Book
Other Formats:
Internet Resource
Services:
Ask a librarian
7. University of Texas at Pan America
Edinburg, TX 78541
Book
Other Formats:
Internet Resource
8. University of Texas at San Antonio
San Antonio, TX 78285
Book
Other Formats:
Internet Resource
9. University of Texas at Tyler
Tyler, TX 75701 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
10. University of Texas of the Permian Basin
Odessa, TX 79762 Other Formats:
Internet Resource
1. California State University, Chico
Chico, CA 95929
Book
2. California State University, Fresno
Fresno, CA 93740
Book
3. California State University, Fullerton
Fullerton, CA 92834
Book
4. California State University, Long Beach
Long Beach, CA 90840
Book
Services:
Ask a librarian
5. California State University, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90032
Book
6. California State University, Monterey Bay Library
Seaside, CA 93955
Book
7. California State University, San Bernardino
San Bernardino, CA 92407
Book
8. Chapman University, Leatherby Library
Orange, CA 92866
Book
9. Claremont College, The
Claremont, CA 91711
Book
10. Livermore Public Library
Livermore, CA 94550 Other Formats:
Internet Resource

Joseph Puentes wrote:
Who in CA has access to WorldCat? Please look up this ISBN number
(below) and send me the list of California Libraries that carry the
book. My access to WorldCat for some reason only gives a partial list of
the libraries that carry books and then it only gives the locations here
in NC and moves out. Most times when a book is located in several
hundred libraries i only get East Coast results.

if so can you do a search of this ISBN: 0292706286 for this book:

Moctezuma's Children-Aztec Royalty Under Spanish Rule, 1520-1700.
Author Donald E. Chipman ISBN 0-292-70628-6
Donald E. Chipman is Professor Emeritus of History at the University of
North texas in Denton.

I'm interested in what CA libraries carry it

joseph

Book Search: Sotelo

I'm trying to find out who knows anything about this book. Please
contact me directly: makas@nc.rr.com

"Sotelo, Fundador del Apellido en Nueva España"

This book is supposed to be used as a source by Salvador Cabral Valdez.

New boyon the block. Nuevo chavo en este sitio.

I wanted to say hello to all my fellow geneaologists on this fine website.

My name is Ernie Alderete and I live in Monterey Park in suburban Los Angeles, California.

My GEDCOM will be uploaded shortly. I am working to corroborate it as far as possible, and to expand my knowledge of my ancestry and ancestors.

Comments

Las Primeras mujeres que pasaron a Nueva España

I came across this link that lists the first Spanish women to come to Mexico (Nueva España) during the first quarter of the XVI century. It was written by Juan Francisco Maura, Associate Professor in Spanish at the University of Vermont.

Comments

Comment

Thank you for bringing Las Primeras Mujeres to my attention.

I read through every entry trying to find my ancestor, Maria Rangel crossed over from Spain with her husband Diego Romo de Vivar in the first half of the 1600s, but I didn't find them in this resource.

Comment

Hi Maria:

I am just wondering how somebody came up with Brentwood as the location for
the NorCal meeting in July. What a great idea! My wife has relatives in
Antioch and I have one brother in Stockton and one near Lodi. It looks like
if I decide to go, I can kill two birds with one stone, meet my "Primas
Norteñas" and visit my family.

John Gonzalez
Wildomar, CA.
1gnzlz@verizon.net

In reply to by gnzlzspd

Comment

John,

Maybe this is a signal that you must come meet with the Northern California Primos y Primas. Anyone else in the north, south or east interested? We put on a pretty good production, or shall I say they put on a good production. Maria and the Sacramento group are very well organized and I have to say I enjoy the workshop format.

Alicia,
San Jose, Ca

John Gonzalez <1gnzlz@verizon.net> wrote:
Hi Maria:

I am just wondering how somebody came up with Brentwood as the location for
the NorCal meeting in July. What a great idea! My wife has relatives in
Antioch and I have one brother in Stockton and one near Lodi. It looks like
if I decide to go, I can kill two birds with one stone, meet my "Primas
Norteñas" and visit my family.

John Gonzalez
Wildomar, CA.
1gnzlz@verizon.net

In reply to by oldcar53

Comment

Alicia Carrillo wrote:

>John,
>
> Maybe this is a signal that you must come meet with the Northern California Primos y Primas. Anyone else in the north, south or east interested?
>
I'm East and I'm interested. I want to come, but only if you have Menudo
(just kidding, but i do love Menudo). . .well maybe next time. Let's
move the next one to say Kansas or Chicago or Texas and I'll spring for
the plane fare there.

I hope you guys take some of the Workshop Teaching and share it with the
whole group. If it is in lecture form I can podcast it either for the
ears of Nuestros Ranchos only or for the world to benefit. What do you
all think? Does anyone attending have a digital recorder?

joseph

> We put on a pretty good production, or shall I say they put on a good production. Maria and the Sacramento group are very well organized and I have to say I enjoy the workshop format.
>
> Alicia,
> San Jose, Ca
>
>John Gonzalez <1gnzlz@verizon.net> wrote:
> Hi Maria:
>
>I am just wondering how somebody came up with Brentwood as the location for
>the NorCal meeting in July. What a great idea! My wife has relatives in
>Antioch and I have one brother in Stockton and one near Lodi. It looks like
>if I decide to go, I can kill two birds with one stone, meet my "Primas
>Norteñas" and visit my family.
>
>John Gonzalez
>Wildomar, CA.
>1gnzlz@verizon.net
>

Aguascalientes Census Reference Scan

I just uploaded the previous Jalisco and Zacatecas Scans of Dr. Platt's
"Census Records for Latin America and the Hispanic United States." This
time I've added the one page scan for Aguascalientes.

Comments

Comment

Joseph:

Is there any way that you can post the Platt Census document as a PDF in the files section? It is very difficult to read and even moreso to print in the current format.

Comment

Thanks. . .I'll see if I can do that. Sounds like it should be straight
forward. I'll give it a good soon.

joseph

arturoramos wrote:

>Joseph:
>
>Is there any way that you can post the Platt Census document as a PDF in the files section? It is very difficult to read and even moreso to print in the current format.

Copying Equipment

Joseph:

The equipemt being used at the Murrieta, Ca. Family History Center is:
Canon Microfilm Scanner 300, coupled to an HP compaq computer with an HP Laser Jet 1320 Printer.
Almost any PC can be used, including laptops. A memmory stick or a CD can be used to take the records home and viewing them at your leisure on your own PC.

Comments

Comment

John:

There are two machines in the Washington DC (Kensington, MD) FHC. One is the old analog type like the one that Joseph describes and the other is the one that you describe.

Unfortunately, we are not allowed to make ANY adjustments to the quality of the scan once the scanner feeds it to the PC nor to save scanned images. The scan automatically gets sent to the printer.

I will bring up this privilege which you have with my local FHC because I would much rather have scans than printouts anyhow. That is why I switched to the use of a digital camera.

Comment

The local FHC is very small and the people there are very friendly and
helpful. They go out of their way to assist the researchers in any way they
can. I have a great working relationship with them.
I wish you good luck and hope you can convince somebody there to make
improvements. You got to talk very nice to the right people.

John Gonzalez
Wildomar, CA.
1gnzlz@verizon.net

Comment

thanks John.

I'll pass on my equipment purchase request to my FHC. I know that the
two FHC close to me don't have that kind of set up. We just have a
viewer that you roll the film onto and it has these marks on the screen.
Anything within those marks will be copied when you click on the button.
There are two lenses so you can make the image larger or smaller with
some adjustment larger/smaller on each individual lense as well.

thanks,

joseph

gnzlzspd wrote:

>Joseph:
>
>The equipemt being used at the Murrieta, Ca. Family History Center is:
>Canon Microfilm Scanner 300, coupled to an HP compaq computer with an HP Laser Jet 1320 Printer.
>Almost any PC can be used, including laptops. A memmory stick or a CD can be used to take the records home and viewing them at your leisure on your own PC.
>
>I was told that the same equipment is available at quite a few of the FHC's
>
>John Gonzalez
>Wildomar, CA.
>
>

FW: Salt Lake Plaza Hotel At Temple Square

I received this today from the director of sales and marketing at the Plaza
Best Western in SLC. We have been allowed ONLY 6 rooms, Mickey and I will
be sharing a room so that leaves 5 rooms for the Ranchos members. Keep in

Comments

Comment

Josie T. Trevino wrote:

>Please let me know if anyone is interested in staying at the Plaza Hotel.
>Mr. Williams has attached a contract
>

the new site doesn't allow attachments. So if this contract is needed
you can do two things:

1) email it to individuals (Recommended)

2) upload it to the website so people can download it.

thanks,

joseph

Notario Films Project

Dear Nuestros Ranchos researchers,

I just went to the Guadalajara section of the FHL catalog and counted
how many films are in the Notario Section ( México, Jalisco, Guadalajara
- Notarial records

Comments

Comment

Hi Joseph:

I was under the impression that ALL the films would be someday digitized.
Are the Notario films being excluded?

You estimate that it would take about 10 years to get approximately 10% to
20% of the films researched. I am just wondering, can these films be
digitized within that time frame? Is there a way to find out? We wouldn't
have to rent them out and researching them would be a breeze from our own
home with our PC's. Just a thought...

John Gonzalez
Wildomar, CA.
1gnzlz@verizon.net

Comment

yes, something to think about.

not sure what their time frame is for getting the Mexico films done.
We'll have to wait and see. Maybe if someone in the group could look
into this when they are in SLC the next time that would be great. You'd
probably need an inside connection to find that info though. . .if it is
know that is.

thanks,

joseph

John Gonzalez wrote:

>Hi Joseph:
>
>I was under the impression that ALL the films would be someday digitized.
>Are the Notario films being excluded?
>
>You estimate that it would take about 10 years to get approximately 10% to
>20% of the films researched. I am just wondering, can these films be
>digitized within that time frame? Is there a way to find out? We wouldn't
>have to rent them out and researching them would be a breeze from our own
>home with our PC's. Just a thought...
>
>John Gonzalez
>Wildomar, CA.
>1gnzlz@verizon.net
>
>

Comment

Joseph,

I believe that before we begin ordering films for this project for each individual, it might be best to request the films for Salt Lake and when some of us go to the conference in October, we can view some these films, identify the content, report back to the group and depending on the findings, determine if the effort is warranted?

What's your thought on this? Just a suggestion..........Alicia

Joseph Puentes wrote:

Dear Nuestros Ranchos researchers,

I just went to the Guadalajara section of the FHL catalog and counted
how many films are in the Notario Section ( México, Jalisco, Guadalajara
- Notarial records
)
There are 1,241 films. As far as I know they are just listed by date and
some give the name of Notario and no information is given as to what
locations they cover. I've understand that these films are a wealth of
information for us, but almost impossible to access since we'd have to
be ordering films and guessing as to which might cover our specific area
or research.

1) Does anyone know if there is a better catalog description for these
films anywhere?

2) Look at the example given below. See the notario named: José María
Anguiano Does anyone know how to research this specific notario? See if
we knew that he only covered Lagos de Moreno and San Juan de los Lagos
then any films by him should identified to those places.

3) I'm thinking of making some of these films into a project. Imagine if
everyone in the group ordered one film. And if all they did was scroll
from beginning to end giving the Area the film covered. Yes I think it
would be nicer if they could pull out the main surname of the person the
record was about, but at least the area being covered. If we got 62
volunteers to do one film each then that would be a whopping 5% of the
films in this Notario Collection. What if a few of us dug into this and
did 3 per year for the next 10 years and we got a few people both inside
and outside the group rolling on this, hey maybe we could have 10-20% of
these films described a little better within our lifetimes so future
generations would be more likely to look at them. Just imagine the 5th
generation of the Nuestros Ranchos group members thinking way way back
to the group as we know it now and thanking us for being willing to
start a work that we might not be able to benefit from. What do you guys
think? I for sure don't want to start something that someone else has
already done, but how do we find if this information is already
available? And if it is already available how do we get the FHL to
associate this info with these specific films?

Joseph Puentes
http://nuestrosranchos.org
==============================

Title
Registros notariales, 1892-1900

Authors
Guadalajara (Jalisco). Notaría (Main Author)

Notes
Microfilm de manuscritos en el Archivo de Instrumentos Públicos en
Guadalajara.
El escribano de estos protocolos es José María Anguiano.

Subjects
México, Jalisco, Guadalajara - Notarial records

Format
Manuscript (On Film)

Language
Spanish

Publication
Salt Lake City, Utah : Filmado por la Sociedad Genealógica de Utah, 1959

Physical
2 rollos de microfilm ; 35 mm.

Film Notes
Note - Location [Film]
Protocolos 1892-1893,1896 - VAULT INTL Film [ 269810 Items 3-6 ]
Protocolos 1892-1900 (documentos) - VAULT INTL Film [ 269756 ]

© 2002 Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.

Comment

great idea. I wasn't wanting to start this right away I just wanted us
to start thinking about this. I wanted ideas about finding out if this
work was already done. Arturos suggestion to check with the Guadalajara
Archives is great so we can see if they have already started this
project. But a quick look when you all are in SLC will give some info on
this as well.

for all I know the individual Notarios are already documented as to
their geographical location of responsibility. Who knows but these films
might all be only one Notario per film. If this unlikely situation were
true it might be as straighforward as just identifying the Notario(s)
for each film. You'd think if it was that easy someone would have
already done it.

Yes I'm not wanting to jump into this. . .just start doing some serious
back ground investigations.

thanks,

joseph

Alicia Carrillo wrote:

>Joseph,
>
> I believe that before we begin ordering films for this project for each individual, it might be best to request the films for Salt Lake and when some of us go to the conference in October, we can view some these films, identify the content, report back to the group and depending on the findings, determine if the effort is warranted?
>
> What's your thought on this? Just a suggestion..........Alicia
>
>Joseph Puentes wrote:
>
>Dear Nuestros Ranchos researchers,
>
>I just went to the Guadalajara section of the FHL catalog and counted
>how many films are in the Notario Section ( México, Jalisco, Guadalajara
>- Notarial records
>)
>There are 1,241 films. As far as I know they are just listed by date and
>some give the name of Notario and no information is given as to what
>locations they cover. I've understand that these films are a wealth of
>information for us, but almost impossible to access since we'd have to
>be ordering films and guessing as to which might cover our specific area
>or research.
>
>1) Does anyone know if there is a better catalog description for these
>films anywhere?
>
>2) Look at the example given below. See the notario named: José María
>Anguiano Does anyone know how to research this specific notario? See if
>we knew that he only covered Lagos de Moreno and San Juan de los Lagos
>then any films by him should identified to those places.
>
>3) I'm thinking of making some of these films into a project. Imagine if
>everyone in the group ordered one film. And if all they did was scroll
>from beginning to end giving the Area the film covered. Yes I think it
>would be nicer if they could pull out the main surname of the person the
>record was about, but at least the area being covered. If we got 62
>volunteers to do one film each then that would be a whopping 5% of the
>films in this Notario Collection. What if a few of us dug into this and
>did 3 per year for the next 10 years and we got a few people both inside
>and outside the group rolling on this, hey maybe we could have 10-20% of
>these films described a little better within our lifetimes so future
>generations would be more likely to look at them. Just imagine the 5th
>generation of the Nuestros Ranchos group members thinking way way back
>to the group as we know it now and thanking us for being willing to
>start a work that we might not be able to benefit from. What do you guys
>think? I for sure don't want to start something that someone else has
>already done, but how do we find if this information is already
>available? And if it is already available how do we get the FHL to
>associate this info with these specific films?
>
>Joseph Puentes
>http://nuestrosranchos.org
>==============================
>
>Title
>Registros notariales, 1892-1900
>
>Authors
>Guadalajara (Jalisco). Notaría (Main Author)
>
>Notes
>Microfilm de manuscritos en el Archivo de Instrumentos Públicos en
>Guadalajara.
>El escribano de estos protocolos es José María Anguiano.
>
>Subjects
>México, Jalisco, Guadalajara - Notarial records
>
>Format
>Manuscript (On Film)
>
>Language
>Spanish
>
>Publication
>Salt Lake City, Utah : Filmado por la Sociedad Genealógica de Utah, 1959
>
>Physical
>2 rollos de microfilm ; 35 mm.
>
>Film Notes
>Note - Location [Film]
>Protocolos 1892-1893,1896 - VAULT INTL Film [ 269810 Items 3-6 ]
>Protocolos 1892-1900 (documentos) - VAULT INTL Film [ 269756 ]
>
>© 2002 Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.
>
>

Comment

The names of all of the Notarios whose protocolos are in the Archivo del Estado de Jalisco is in a document that appears in the Archive's website. By the dates you can probably match up some of the films:

http://archivohistorico.jalisco.gob.mx/pdf/gu%EDa%20de%20notarios.PDF

PS... Only because you asked Joseph... the last message you sent out had a really LONG trail of previous posts. We should really be trimming our messages lest the postings online and the digests end up being a mess.

Comment

Arturo Ramos wrote:

>The names of all of the Notarios whose protocolos are in the Archivo del Estado de Jalisco is in a document that appears in the Archive's website. By the dates you can probably match up some of the films:
>
>http://archivohistorico.jalisco.gob.mx/pdf/gu%EDa%20de%20notarios.PDF
>
>PS... Only because you asked Joseph...
>
Yes, very good! Well deserved rebuff. thanks.I'll try harder.

> the last message you sent out had a really LONG trail of previous posts. We should really be trimming our messages lest the postings online and the digests end up being a mess.
>

so do you know what that means? What are protocols and what are the
related documents? For example on page 5 #12 we have a Roman Martin
(1828-1865) who has 31 protocolo and 16 documentos. Wonder what that means?

What a great list. I wish they would have included what areas the
specific Notario was covering. Am I understanding this correctly? I
thought that there were Notario's that covered specific areas. I can't
see one Notario being in charge of the whole state, the burden of the
work would have been overwhelming. but then maybe I don't understand
correctly how the system worked.

I wish there was a good book that explained how the notario system worked.

thanks,

joseph

Comment

Do you know if the same list of Notarios exist for Zacatecas? Do you think
the wills and other public documents from Jerez will be in Guadalajara? I
haven't been able to locate them

susana

Comment

Susana:

I believe that the notarios that were functioning in Jerez in the early years were mostly based out of Zacatecas, but I know that there is a municipal archive in Jerez that has some notary records as well. I just don't know how far back Jerez had its own notaries and/or served as a place for storage of such notarial records.

I know that Leonardo de la Torre Berumen has transcribed some wills and capellanias of Jerez families. What I don't know is where he got those wills (in Zacatecas or Jerez?)

I think I mentioned earlier that they have just begun organizing the notarial records in Tlaltenango as well.

Comment

Joseph:

I think that the project, as you propose it, is a bit too unwieldy. While I see the value in creating some sort of index for these records, I think the most valuable ones would be the ones from the 16th and 17th centuries when the church records are spotty.

I am thinking back about George Ryskamp's presentation at NARA where he spoke of the general difficulty with using notarial records and he was talking about their use in Spain, where most archives have already created indices.

If anything, perhaps this project should focus on the very early records. I also think that you should coordinate with the archivists in Guadalajara as they may be taking on an indexing project themselves. I know that in Tlaltenango, the municipality has begun such a project with all of the old notarial records they had in their posession which up until recently had been stashed away and were practically unknown to the world.

Comment

arturoramos wrote:

>Joseph:
>
>I think that the project, as you propose it, is a bit too unwieldy. While I see the value in creating some sort of index for these records, I think the most valuable ones would be the ones from the 16th and 17th centuries when the church records are spotty.
>
>I am thinking back about George Ryskamp's presentation at NARA where he spoke of the general difficulty with using notarial records and he was talking about their use in Spain, where most archives have already created indices.
>
>If anything, perhaps this project should focus on the very early records. I also think that you should coordinate with the archivists in Guadalajara as they may be taking on an indexing project themselves.
>
Yes this is a good idea. For all we know this might already be done or
hopefully at least started. thanks for the idea.

José Román. . .puedes ponerme en contacto con alguien en los Archivos de
Guadalajara? No se si conoces alguien alli o nomas en los archivos de la
ciudad de Mexico?

joseph

> I know that in Tlaltenango, the municipality has begun such a project with all of the old notarial records they had in their posession which up until recently had been stashed away and were practically unknown to the world.

Lost Pictures/Albums???

if you go to the Albums and your Album is suddenly missing well its not.
I've created general Albums (Root Albums). Now when you see a catagory
of what your pictures will fit under you click on the Root Album and

Creating an album

Linda,

I did the same thing earlier. The problem is that you first have to
open up an existing album. Then you'll get the option to "Add an
album". You'll see a drop down control below, select the Root folder

Comments

Comment

Maria, thank you for responding and I did what you said and I created an album! Now how do I delete the photo's that are not in the the album I created? Now I have double entries on those 4 photo's.. Joseph or Arturo, are you out there?? Am I the only one who's done this?

Linda Castanon-Long

Comment

Okay, I answered my own question.. I did delete the photo's that were not in an album even though it told me I was denied access.. learn as I go!
thanks anyway, Linda

longsjourney wrote:

Maria, thank you for responding and I did what you said and I created an album! Now how do I delete the photo's that are not in the the album I created? Now I have double entries on those 4 photo's.. Joseph or Arturo, are you out there?? Am I the only one who's done this?

Linda Castanon-Long

Noria de San Pantaleon/El Durazno/San Antonio de Belen, Zacatecas

I've just uploaded 4 maps to the albums/maps area of the group primarily
for Ken Alva showing his Ranchos: Noria de San Pantaleon. But I seem to
remember someone else talking about El Durazno and San Antonio de Belen

Comments

Comment

Who lives there now? What kind of economy is there? My goodness, how sad to see this place. You're right in that the vistas there are lovely but how sad that there appears to be very little life in that place. Marge V.:)

Comment

I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.

Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary right next to it.

Ed Serros

Comment

Ed:

Please upload your pictures. I would love to see them. That is one of the reasons why we put up the albums function on the site. I think there are a number of people who are members of the group who have never had a chance to see what the region that we are researching looks like and it would probably be very precious for them (and me and others) to see your photos.

Comment

I have uploaded pictures of La Noria de San Panteleon, a place that is eerie but at the same time very peaceful and natural. When I was there I looked at the walls that were old and cracked; the next moment I could almost feel the activity and the life of the town spring from those same walls.

I have pictures of Sombrerete also. If someone has an interest in seeing this town which was used in many westerns years ago, I will upload them. It is truly a mining town. The Conde Don Fernando de la Campa y Cos, who was from the Valparaiso and Zacatecas, Zacatecas area, is buried here. The haciendas that stretch from Valaparaiso to Fresnillo and Zacatecas were built by de la Campa and his descendants. These haciendas today are simply shells of their former glory and mark the end of the personal wealth created by the silver mines of Zacatecas.

Ed

Comment

Ed,

I would like for you to post pictures of Sombrerete.

I don't know if "comments" added to the pictures get automatically
delivered to the person who posts the pictures but I've added some
questions about the mine picture and the "grave" picture you uploaded.
Thanks for adding that. Well since they don't go out to the group here
they are?

[[[[[[

Yes I know you made mention of Silver in your email, but is there still
mineable Silver there? I would have thought that would have long since
been mined out. Goes to show you how much Silver was there and still is
there.

joseph

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

=====================

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

Who was that big one? Is it Don Fernando de la Campa y Cos'. Is your
G-Grandfather's one of those visible?

I was told that most of the markers especially going back to the 1800's
would have long rotted away because they would have simply been wooden
markers. Did you see any evidence of ancient wooden markers that were in
a nearly complete state of root, but still visible?

Those other markers just look like plumbing pipe shaped into crosses. Is
that what they are made of?

tell us more of this page.

joseph

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Edward Serros wrote:

>I have uploaded pictures of La Noria de San Panteleon, a place that is eerie but at the same time very peaceful and natural. When I was there I looked at the walls that were old and cracked; the next moment I could almost feel the activity and the life of the town spring from those same walls.
>
>I have pictures of Sombrerete also. If someone has an interest in seeing this town which was used in many westerns years ago, I will upload them. It is truly a mining town. The Conde Don Fernando de la Campa y Cos, who was from the Valparaiso and Zacatecas, Zacatecas area, is buried here. The haciendas that stretch from Valaparaiso to Fresnillo and Zacatecas were built by de la Campa and his descendants. These haciendas today are simply shells of their former glory and mark the end of the personal wealth created by the silver mines of Zacatecas.
>
>Ed

Comment

Carol Turner wrote:

>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>forward to viewing these pictures.
>
>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>Marquez??
>
Yes I have two, but they are not very good. Look in Albums-->Suaz de los
Marquez

joseph

ps: see the monument. Is that your main line relative: Francisco Muro
Marquez? He was Historiador now wouldn't that imply that he wrote
something about the area? Seems like we need to investigate this. If you
know how he is our Relative please let me know, maybe Susanna knows also.

>
>
>

Comment

Wow, Carol, now we have a mystery. that map I sent to the group
positively shows Sauz de los Marquez in Zacatecas, but that monument
shows the name Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO. Amazing. I hadn't
remembered that. We're going to have to do more investigating as to
where it is. I can't imagine that there would be two of them. Maybe the
Ranchos changed from Jalisco to Zacatecas recently since that monument
was put up in 1979.

I'm not sure this is the same person but here is a short piece from a
Historiador Francisco Muro Marquez:

http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/Cultura.nsf/1897878423bd1e6486256c860061f796/…

28 de Abril

-1578 el historiador Francisco Muro Márquez señaló que Santa María de
los Ángeles fue fundada donde, tras varios autos y escritos, se asienta
el acta de fundación.
-1598 se recibió la cédula real, suscrita por el rey Felipe II, que
autorizaba la fundación de la frontera de San Luis Obispo, en Colotlán.

Carol Turner wrote:

>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>forward to viewing these pictures.
>
>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>Marquez??
>
>
>

Comment

Sauz de los Marquez is in Jalisco presently. It is part of the
municipality of Santa Maria de Los Angeles. It would not surprise me if
that rancho was at some point considered part of Zacatecas. It is right
on the border and I don't think those borders were very firm until very
recently.

The three little fingers of Jalisco that jut out into Zacatecas (which
include Santa Maria de los Angeles) are really an anomaly
geographically. They are the remnants of the military colony set up by
the Viceroy of New Spain around the Tlaxcaltec colonies of Colotlan and
Mezquitic. They remained under the control of the Viceroy and were not
subject to the rule of the Audiencia de Guadalajara until nearly the end
of the Spanish colony. Therefore they were not integrated into the
intendencia de Zacatecas when it was spun off from Jalisco (Nueva
Galicia).

You will note that Colotlan and Santa Maria de Los Angeles are actually
part of the diocese of Zacatecas and NOT Guadalajara. Furthermore, the
only way to access these towns by road is through Zacatecas... they have
no direct road access to any other part of Jalisco. They are basically
part of Zacatecas but for some historical anomaly that left them part of
Jalisco.

-----Original Message-----
From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Puentes
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:01 AM
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org; Carol Turner
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO

Wow, Carol, now we have a mystery. that map I sent to the group
positively shows Sauz de los Marquez in Zacatecas, but that monument
shows the name Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO. Amazing. I hadn't
remembered that. We're going to have to do more investigating as to
where it is. I can't imagine that there would be two of them. Maybe the
Ranchos changed from Jalisco to Zacatecas recently since that monument
was put up in 1979.

I'm not sure this is the same person but here is a short piece from a
Historiador Francisco Muro Marquez:

http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/Cultura.nsf/1897878423bd1e6486256c860061f796/f
5301d84e617e56a06256cfb006dc1cb?OpenDocument

28 de Abril

-1578 el historiador Francisco Muro Márquez señaló que Santa María de
los Ángeles fue fundada donde, tras varios autos y escritos, se asienta
el acta de fundación.
-1598 se recibió la cédula real, suscrita por el rey Felipe II, que
autorizaba la fundación de la frontera de San Luis Obispo, en Colotlán.

Carol Turner wrote:

>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>forward to viewing these pictures.
>
>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>Marquez??
>
>
>

Comment

I just uploaded a map to the Sauz de los Marquez album that shows it in
Zacatecas. Maybe the map is in error. . .if it is then that puts into
doubt this whole series of maps.

joseph

go to Albums-->Sauz de los Marquez-->Sauz Map

Arturo Ramos wrote:

>Sauz de los Marquez is in Jalisco presently. It is part of the
>municipality of Santa Maria de Los Angeles. It would not surprise me if
>that rancho was at some point considered part of Zacatecas. It is right
>on the border and I don't think those borders were very firm until very
>recently.
>
>The three little fingers of Jalisco that jut out into Zacatecas (which
>include Santa Maria de los Angeles) are really an anomaly
>geographically. They are the remnants of the military colony set up by
>the Viceroy of New Spain around the Tlaxcaltec colonies of Colotlan and
>Mezquitic. They remained under the control of the Viceroy and were not
>subject to the rule of the Audiencia de Guadalajara until nearly the end
>of the Spanish colony. Therefore they were not integrated into the
>intendencia de Zacatecas when it was spun off from Jalisco (Nueva
>Galicia).
>
>You will note that Colotlan and Santa Maria de Los Angeles are actually
>part of the diocese of Zacatecas and NOT Guadalajara. Furthermore, the
>only way to access these towns by road is through Zacatecas... they have
>no direct road access to any other part of Jalisco. They are basically
>part of Zacatecas but for some historical anomaly that left them part of
>Jalisco.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
>Puentes
>Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:01 AM
>To: research@nuestrosranchos.org; Carol Turner
>Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO
>
>Wow, Carol, now we have a mystery. that map I sent to the group
>positively shows Sauz de los Marquez in Zacatecas, but that monument
>shows the name Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO. Amazing. I hadn't
>remembered that. We're going to have to do more investigating as to
>where it is. I can't imagine that there would be two of them. Maybe the
>Ranchos changed from Jalisco to Zacatecas recently since that monument
>was put up in 1979.
>
>I'm not sure this is the same person but here is a short piece from a
>Historiador Francisco Muro Marquez:
>
>http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/Cultura.nsf/1897878423bd1e6486256c860061f796/f
>5301d84e617e56a06256cfb006dc1cb?OpenDocument
>
>28 de Abril
>
>-1578 el historiador Francisco Muro Márquez señaló que Santa María de
>los Ángeles fue fundada donde, tras varios autos y escritos, se asienta
>el acta de fundación.
>-1598 se recibió la cédula real, suscrita por el rey Felipe II, que
>autorizaba la fundación de la frontera de San Luis Obispo, en Colotlán.
>
>Carol Turner wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>>forward to viewing these pictures.
>>
>>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>>Marquez??
>>
>>
>>

Comment

Your maps are obviously geological relief maps probably based on
satellite topography imaging. Unfortunately you cannot tell where
political boundaries are from space. I think your mapmaker was a bit
lazy in drawing the political boundaries on that map as there are no
"straight line" boundaries in the three-finger region on Jalisco. I
know that this is a big issue with Nayarit as the indigenous communities
in the Sierra de Huicholes have begun litigating land claims and often
neither they nor officials know what state their lands are in because
the boundaries are somewhat confusing and/or unclear...

I uploaded a map from INEGI's digital interactive map showing Santa
Maria de los Angeles. Though Sauz de los Marquez is not labeled, it is
easily discernable as the place where the three roads and one trail meet
just above the gray scale marker on the bottom right. It is clearly in
Jalisco.

I also put a link to the INEGI digital map. I will put up a separate
post about that.

-----Original Message-----
From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Puentes
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:46 PM
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO

I just uploaded a map to the Sauz de los Marquez album that shows it in
Zacatecas. Maybe the map is in error. . .if it is then that puts into
doubt this whole series of maps.

joseph

go to Albums-->Sauz de los Marquez-->Sauz Map

Arturo Ramos wrote:

>Sauz de los Marquez is in Jalisco presently. It is part of the
>municipality of Santa Maria de Los Angeles. It would not surprise me
if
>that rancho was at some point considered part of Zacatecas. It is
right
>on the border and I don't think those borders were very firm until very
>recently.
>
>The three little fingers of Jalisco that jut out into Zacatecas (which
>include Santa Maria de los Angeles) are really an anomaly
>geographically. They are the remnants of the military colony set up by
>the Viceroy of New Spain around the Tlaxcaltec colonies of Colotlan and
>Mezquitic. They remained under the control of the Viceroy and were not
>subject to the rule of the Audiencia de Guadalajara until nearly the
end
>of the Spanish colony. Therefore they were not integrated into the
>intendencia de Zacatecas when it was spun off from Jalisco (Nueva
>Galicia).
>
>You will note that Colotlan and Santa Maria de Los Angeles are actually
>part of the diocese of Zacatecas and NOT Guadalajara. Furthermore, the
>only way to access these towns by road is through Zacatecas... they
have
>no direct road access to any other part of Jalisco. They are basically
>part of Zacatecas but for some historical anomaly that left them part
of
>Jalisco.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
>Puentes
>Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:01 AM
>To: research@nuestrosranchos.org; Carol Turner
>Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO
>
>Wow, Carol, now we have a mystery. that map I sent to the group
>positively shows Sauz de los Marquez in Zacatecas, but that monument
>shows the name Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO. Amazing. I hadn't
>remembered that. We're going to have to do more investigating as to
>where it is. I can't imagine that there would be two of them. Maybe the

>Ranchos changed from Jalisco to Zacatecas recently since that monument
>was put up in 1979.
>
>I'm not sure this is the same person but here is a short piece from a
>Historiador Francisco Muro Marquez:
>
>http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/Cultura.nsf/1897878423bd1e6486256c860061f796/
f
>5301d84e617e56a06256cfb006dc1cb?OpenDocument
>
>28 de Abril
>
>-1578 el historiador Francisco Muro Márquez señaló que Santa María de
>los Ángeles fue fundada donde, tras varios autos y escritos, se asienta

>el acta de fundación.
>-1598 se recibió la cédula real, suscrita por el rey Felipe II, que
>autorizaba la fundación de la frontera de San Luis Obispo, en Colotlán.
>
>Carol Turner wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>>forward to viewing these pictures.
>>
>>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>>Marquez??
>>
>>
>>

Comment

I thought I had created an album entitled 'Revolution in Zacatecas, Zacatecas 1913" but all I did was submit 4 photo's that are not in an album... help!!!
Can someone send me the correct instructions since left to my own devices I'm dangerous...

Linda in Everett...

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

Comment

great. . .this is good to know. Even though these maps are very very
detailed they will have to be marked as "suspect" for accuracy.

thanks,

joseph

Arturo Ramos wrote:

>Joseph:
>
>Your maps are obviously geological relief maps probably based on
>satellite topography imaging. Unfortunately you cannot tell where
>political boundaries are from space. I think your mapmaker was a bit
>lazy in drawing the political boundaries on that map as there are no
>"straight line" boundaries in the three-finger region on Jalisco. I
>know that this is a big issue with Nayarit as the indigenous communities
>in the Sierra de Huicholes have begun litigating land claims and often
>neither they nor officials know what state their lands are in because
>the boundaries are somewhat confusing and/or unclear...
>
>I uploaded a map from INEGI's digital interactive map showing Santa
>Maria de los Angeles. Though Sauz de los Marquez is not labeled, it is
>easily discernable as the place where the three roads and one trail meet
>just above the gray scale marker on the bottom right. It is clearly in
>Jalisco.
>
>I also put a link to the INEGI digital map. I will put up a separate
>post about that.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
>Puentes
>Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:46 PM
>To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
>Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO
>
>I just uploaded a map to the Sauz de los Marquez album that shows it in
>Zacatecas. Maybe the map is in error. . .if it is then that puts into
>doubt this whole series of maps.
>
>joseph
>
>go to Albums-->Sauz de los Marquez-->Sauz Map
>
>Arturo Ramos wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sauz de los Marquez is in Jalisco presently. It is part of the
>>municipality of Santa Maria de Los Angeles. It would not surprise me
>>
>>
>if
>
>
>>that rancho was at some point considered part of Zacatecas. It is
>>
>>
>right
>
>
>>on the border and I don't think those borders were very firm until very
>>recently.
>>
>>The three little fingers of Jalisco that jut out into Zacatecas (which
>>include Santa Maria de los Angeles) are really an anomaly
>>geographically. They are the remnants of the military colony set up by
>>the Viceroy of New Spain around the Tlaxcaltec colonies of Colotlan and
>>Mezquitic. They remained under the control of the Viceroy and were not
>>subject to the rule of the Audiencia de Guadalajara until nearly the
>>
>>
>end
>
>
>>of the Spanish colony. Therefore they were not integrated into the
>>intendencia de Zacatecas when it was spun off from Jalisco (Nueva
>>Galicia).
>>
>>You will note that Colotlan and Santa Maria de Los Angeles are actually
>>part of the diocese of Zacatecas and NOT Guadalajara. Furthermore, the
>>only way to access these towns by road is through Zacatecas... they
>>
>>
>have
>
>
>>no direct road access to any other part of Jalisco. They are basically
>>part of Zacatecas but for some historical anomaly that left them part
>>
>>
>of
>
>
>>Jalisco.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>>[mailto:research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
>>Puentes
>>Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:01 AM
>>To: research@nuestrosranchos.org; Carol Turner
>>Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO
>>
>>Wow, Carol, now we have a mystery. that map I sent to the group
>>positively shows Sauz de los Marquez in Zacatecas, but that monument
>>shows the name Sauz de los Marquez, JALISCO. Amazing. I hadn't
>>remembered that. We're going to have to do more investigating as to
>>where it is. I can't imagine that there would be two of them. Maybe the
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Ranchos changed from Jalisco to Zacatecas recently since that monument
>>was put up in 1979.
>>
>>I'm not sure this is the same person but here is a short piece from a
>>Historiador Francisco Muro Marquez:
>>
>>http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/Cultura.nsf/1897878423bd1e6486256c860061f796/
>>
>>
>f
>
>
>>5301d84e617e56a06256cfb006dc1cb?OpenDocument
>>
>>28 de Abril
>>
>>-1578 el historiador Francisco Muro Márquez señaló que Santa María de
>>los Ángeles fue fundada donde, tras varios autos y escritos, se asienta
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>el acta de fundación.
>>-1598 se recibió la cédula real, suscrita por el rey Felipe II, que
>>autorizaba la fundación de la frontera de San Luis Obispo, en Colotlán.
>>
>>Carol Turner wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ed please upload the pictures of Sombrerete; my
>>>grandmother and four generations Lopez family is from
>>>the at area as well as my Gonzalez family. I'll look
>>>forward to viewing these pictures.
>>>
>>>Does anybody have any pictures of Sauz de los
>>>Marquez??
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--- Edward Serros wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have uploaded pictures of La Noria de San
>>>>Panteleon, a place that is eerie but at the same
>>>>time very peaceful and natural. When I was there I
>>>>looked at the walls that were old and cracked; the
>>>>next moment I could almost feel the activity and the
>>>>life of the town spring from those same walls.
>>>>
>>>>I have pictures of Sombrerete also. If someone has
>>>>an interest in seeing this town which was used in
>>>>many westerns years ago, I will upload them. It is
>>>>truly a mining town. The Conde Don Fernando de la
>>>>Campa y Cos, who was from the Valparaiso and
>>>>Zacatecas, Zacatecas area, is buried here. The
>>>>haciendas that stretch from Valaparaiso to Fresnillo
>>>>and Zacatecas were built by de la Campa and his
>>>>descendants. These haciendas today are simply shells
>>>>of their former glory and mark the end of the
>>>>personal wealth created by the silver mines of
>>>>Zacatecas.
>>>>
>>>>Ed
>>>>-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>>>Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
>>>>
>>>>To post, send email to:
>>>>research@nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>>To change your subscription, log on to:
>>>>http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>__________________________________________________
>>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>http://mail.yahoo.com

Comment

I have uploaded pictures of Sombrerete in the album section. I have also added one more picture to the La Noria album. This last picture is one of old miners, circa 1900.

Joseph, I have made additional comments on the cemetary pictures of La Noria. There are a few people who still live there but I could not figure out where since it appeared to be a ghost town. If they lived there, I wonder if they had any water or electricity.

I can upload pictures of Zacatecas, Zacatecas if any one is interested.

Ed

Comment

yes please do load the Zacatecs, Zacatecas pictures.

thanks much,

joseph

Edward Serros wrote:

>I have uploaded pictures of Sombrerete in the album section. I have also added one more picture to the La Noria album. This last picture is one of old miners, circa 1900.
>
>Joseph, I have made additional comments on the cemetary pictures of La Noria. There are a few people who still live there but I could not figure out where since it appeared to be a ghost town. If they lived there, I wonder if they had any water or electricity.
>
>I can upload pictures of Zacatecas, Zacatecas if any one is interested.
>
>Ed

Comment

Edward Serros wrote:

>I have uploaded pictures of Sombrerete in the album section. I have also added one more picture to the La Noria album. This last picture is one of old miners, circa 1900.
>
>Joseph, I have made additional comments on the cemetary pictures of La Noria.
>

Yes I see it now. . .I didn't read this before: [The cemetary where I
found the grave of my great grandfather, Agustin Salas. The crosses are
made of steel pipes either welded together or screwed onto a four way
pipe connector.]

joseph

ps: who was that big one in the middle? Was it your Great Grandfather?

> There are a few people who still live there but I could not figure out where since it appeared to be a ghost town. If they lived there, I wonder if they had any water or electricity.
>
>I can upload pictures of Zacatecas, Zacatecas if any one is interested.
>
>Ed

Comment

Ed,

with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining Nuestros
Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.

upload away Ed,

When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone know.
In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting company
(Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach because
that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
assist us in our research.

Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us your
Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your Cuentos/Stories.
Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.

joseph

ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
Wisardry for this new found freedom.

pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.

Edward Serros wrote:

>I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>
>Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary right next to it.
>
>Ed Serros

Comment

Dear Joseph,
Can we kick in with a contribution to you for sharing the cost of the
package? Marge:)

On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Joseph Puentes wrote:

> Ed,
>
> with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
> Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
> space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
> curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining Nuestros
> Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.
>
> upload away Ed,
>
> When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone
> know.
> In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting company
> (Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach
> because
> that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
> assist us in our research.
>
> Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us your
> Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your Cuentos/Stories.
> Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.
>
> joseph
>
> ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
> Wisardry for this new found freedom.
>
> pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.
>
>
>
> Edward Serros wrote:
>
>> I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La
>> Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>>
>> Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one
>> year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it
>> is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary
>> right next to it.
>>
>> Ed Serros

Comment

yes when and if the need comes about for us to upgrade to the next
DreamHost service plan I'll accept donations. Right now I've got it
covered. Here are our figures:

used:
Totals: 784.548 MB

Available is 1/2 of 22900MB since I've got my NuestraFamiliaUnida
podcast on it as well. So 1/2 is 11450MB and we haven't reached 1000MB
yet. So we can grow roughly 10 times larger than we are now before I
start sweating like I was on the Yahoo group.

Arturo Am I correctly estimating this?

joseph

Margarita Vallazza wrote:

>Dear Joseph,
>Can we kick in with a contribution to you for sharing the cost of the
>package? Marge:)
>
>On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Joseph Puentes wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ed,
>>
>>with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
>>Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
>>space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
>>curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining Nuestros
>>Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.
>>
>>upload away Ed,
>>
>>When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone
>>know.
>>In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting company
>>(Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach
>>because
>>that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
>>assist us in our research.
>>
>>Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us your
>>Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your Cuentos/Stories.
>>Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.
>>
>>joseph
>>
>>ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
>>Wisardry for this new found freedom.
>>
>>pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.
>>
>>
>>
>>Edward Serros wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La
>>>Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>>>
>>>Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one
>>>year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it
>>>is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary
>>>right next to it.
>>>
>>>Ed Serros

Comment

Well, where shall I send it? Marge:)
On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Joseph Puentes wrote:

> yes when and if the need comes about for us to upgrade to the next
> DreamHost service plan I'll accept donations. Right now I've got it
> covered. Here are our figures:
>
> used:
> Totals: 784.548 MB
>
>
> Available is 1/2 of 22900MB since I've got my NuestraFamiliaUnida
> podcast on it as well. So 1/2 is 11450MB and we haven't reached 1000MB
> yet. So we can grow roughly 10 times larger than we are now before I
> start sweating like I was on the Yahoo group.
>
> Arturo Am I correctly estimating this?
>
> joseph
>
>
>
>
> Margarita Vallazza wrote:
>
>> Dear Joseph,
>> Can we kick in with a contribution to you for sharing the cost of the
>> package? Marge:)
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Joseph Puentes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Ed,
>>>
>>> with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
>>> Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
>>> space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
>>> curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining
>>> Nuestros
>>> Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.
>>>
>>> upload away Ed,
>>>
>>> When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone
>>> know.
>>> In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting
>>> company
>>> (Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach
>>> because
>>> that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
>>> assist us in our research.
>>>
>>> Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us
>>> your
>>> Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your
>>> Cuentos/Stories.
>>> Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.
>>>
>>> joseph
>>>
>>> ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
>>> Wisardry for this new found freedom.
>>>
>>> pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Edward Serros wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La
>>>> Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took
>>>> one
>>>> year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it
>>>> is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary
>>>> right next to it.
>>>>
>>>> Ed Serros
>>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>>> Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
>>>>
>>>> To post, send email to:
>>>> research@nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>> To change your subscription, log on to:
>>>> http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>> Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
>>>
>>> To post, send email to:
>>> research@nuestrosranchos.org
>>>
>>> To change your subscription, log on to:
>>> http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Comment

Joseph:

If you think you can fill up 125 GB with podcasts on your other site, then yes, we only have 1/2 of the 250GB on your plan for this site. As far as I can tell we have less that 800MB used between the two sites... and that includes a fair deal of material that can be deleted (i.e. files I uploaded when building the site that are no longer needed). I think the Nuestros Ranchos site takes up less than 500MB now so we could theoretically store 20x the amount of data we currently have and more if Joseph is generous and lets this site use more than half of his disk space.

I really don't foresee this happening anytime soon.

Comment

Joseph and moderators,
I'm not sure where to post my poem in the new site. Would it be possible for me to submit it here and have one of you put it in the correct folder or file. I was thinking of submitting it to Somos Primos or your podcast, but I'm not sure how to go about doing so. Please advise..... yolanda medina perez

Joseph Puentes wrote:
yes when and if the need comes about for us to upgrade to the next
DreamHost service plan I'll accept donations. Right now I've got it
covered. Here are our figures:

used:
Totals: 784.548 MB

Available is 1/2 of 22900MB since I've got my NuestraFamiliaUnida
podcast on it as well. So 1/2 is 11450MB and we haven't reached 1000MB
yet. So we can grow roughly 10 times larger than we are now before I
start sweating like I was on the Yahoo group.

Arturo Am I correctly estimating this?

joseph

Margarita Vallazza wrote:

>Dear Joseph,
>Can we kick in with a contribution to you for sharing the cost of the
>package? Marge:)
>
>On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Joseph Puentes wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ed,
>>
>>with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
>>Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
>>space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
>>curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining Nuestros
>>Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.
>>
>>upload away Ed,
>>
>>When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone
>>know.
>>In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting company
>>(Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach
>>because
>>that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
>>assist us in our research.
>>
>>Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us your
>>Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your Cuentos/Stories.
>>Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.
>>
>>joseph
>>
>>ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
>>Wisardry for this new found freedom.
>>
>>pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.
>>
>>
>>
>>Edward Serros wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La
>>>Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>>>
>>>Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one
>>>year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it
>>>is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary
>>>right next to it.
>>>
>>>Ed Serros

Comment

Please send it to both. Somos Primos will get your poem much more
exposure, but I want to read it too.

make a word file and put in ??? (send it to me and we'll figure out
where it will go)

# Member Genealogy Files
# Reference Materials
# Books and Articles

eventually we'll probably have more catagories. Maybe one that called:
Oral Histories/Poems/Stories
maybe another called Recipes/Misc.

What other catagories do we need?

joseph

Yolanda Bobby Perez wrote:

>Joseph and moderators,
> I'm not sure where to post my poem in the new site. Would it be possible for me to submit it here and have one of you put it in the correct folder or file. I was thinking of submitting it to Somos Primos or your podcast, but I'm not sure how to go about doing so. Please advise..... yolanda medina perez
>
>Joseph Puentes wrote:
> yes when and if the need comes about for us to upgrade to the next
>DreamHost service plan I'll accept donations. Right now I've got it
>covered. Here are our figures:
>
>used:
>Totals: 784.548 MB
>
>
>Available is 1/2 of 22900MB since I've got my NuestraFamiliaUnida
>podcast on it as well. So 1/2 is 11450MB and we haven't reached 1000MB
>yet. So we can grow roughly 10 times larger than we are now before I
>start sweating like I was on the Yahoo group.
>
>Arturo Am I correctly estimating this?
>
>joseph
>
>
>
>
>Margarita Vallazza wrote:
>
>
>
>>Dear Joseph,
>>Can we kick in with a contribution to you for sharing the cost of the
>>package? Marge:)
>>
>>On Apr 12, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Joseph Puentes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ed,
>>>
>>>with the new site we have vastly more file space than in my miserly
>>>Yahoo days. Yahoo was limiting us in more than one way. We have more
>>>space and now we seem to be visible now that we're outside the Yahoo
>>>curtain. Lately we've seen an increase of interest in joining Nuestros
>>>Ranchos at least 50-100% more than what was seen while a Yahoo group.
>>>
>>>upload away Ed,
>>>
>>>When I get to 60% of my capacity of the new site I'll let everyone
>>>know.
>>>In fact I'm purchasing the minimum package now with the hosting company
>>>(Dreamhost) so the next step up would be a dream for us to reach
>>>because
>>>that would mean we would have a tremendous input of great material to
>>>assist us in our research.
>>>
>>>Everyone Upload away. Show us pictures. Teach us lessons. Tell us your
>>>Oral History. Give us your Recipes. Share with us your Cuentos/Stories.
>>>Sing us your Songs. Recite to us your Poems.
>>>
>>>joseph
>>>
>>>ps: we can all be thankful to Arturo for his wonderful Webmaster
>>>Wisardry for this new found freedom.
>>>
>>>pps: contact Ken Alva about La Noria de San Pantaleon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Edward Serros wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I am interested in communicating with anyone with knowledge of La
>>>>Noria de San Pantaleon and its people.
>>>>
>>>>Furthermore I have pictures of this "pueblo fantasma" that I took one
>>>>year ago. If anyone is interested I can upload a few pictures if it
>>>>is OK with Joseph. It is a true ghost town with a very old cemetary
>>>>right next to it.
>>>>
>>>>Ed Serros
>>>>-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>>>Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
>>>>
>>>>To post, send email to:
>>>>research@nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>>To change your subscription, log on to:
>>>>http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Tlaltenango Marriages in GEDCOM Database

I have begun transcribing all of the paleography I have been doing on
the Tlaltenango marriages film into the GEDCOM database. I have also
been supplementing it from the IGI entries from the contemporary

Comments

Comment

cool, cool project. . .I'd love to help, but but but, well, tell me is
it something along the realms of dataentry that you need help with or
will I need to order that film and transcribing. I don't get to the FHC
much these days so It would be hard for me to volunteer for something
that I might not get to for a long time.

. . .but if you have many digital photos of record that you need data
entered for well YES send me 25 and let's see how long it takes me to
get through that many records.

joseph

Arturo Ramos wrote:

>I have begun transcribing all of the paleography I have been doing on
>the Tlaltenango marriages film into the GEDCOM database. I have also
>been supplementing it from the IGI entries from the contemporary
>baptisms film and some information I have from the Jerez parrish
>registers also from the same time. It appears that many of these
>families would marry back and forth between the two towns. as would be
>expected given that they are so close. There are actually a few
>Colotlan marriages that I have run across as well, where the local
>priest in Tlaltenango would record a marriage that took place in
>Colotlan when one of the spouses was from his jurisdiction.
>
>
>
>Click on GEDCOM from the top menu to view. You can either search the
>database or list by surname. If anybody is interested in helping me get
>through the film, please let me know.
>

Comment

Anyone have a clue as to the difference between Momax and Tlaltenango films

It seems that Cuculiten is closer to Momax but I'm finding info in the
Tlaltenango films. I would guess that in realitiy it would be much safer
to check both sets of films for Cuculiten info. Is that the general
thought.

Would this be similar to folks living close to Santa Maria de Los
Angeles and then sometimes taking their church "business" to either
Huejucar or Colotlan instead?

just out of choice.

joseph

creating an album.. HELP!

By the way, GREAT pictures - I have some from Michoacan during the
revolution. If anyone wants me to post, let me know.

Esperanza

INEGI digital map

The Mexican government has an agency called the Instituto Nacional de
Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica (INEGI). They have incredibly
valuable inofmration on the Mexican census, central bank statistics and

References: A Must!

Imagine one day you DIE and five generations pass before a researcher
comes along in your family and finds a copy of your work. Think how
elated this person is to realize that you have dug so deeply into your

Comments

Comment

I totally agree with you Joseph. I was lucky to have gotten in that habit early on in my research and it has saved me a lot of re-work on multiple occasions. Once I found I had a death date for an ancestress that preceeded the birth of the children. I thought to myself; "What was I thinking?". I looked at the source I cited and realized it was the marriage date and I had simply typed in the date in the wrong box. Without knowing where I got the information I might've just deleted that date and gone back to square one or gone through my prints trying to find the original record. I have also found it's a good way to keep track of what records you've already looked through.

Maria

Comment

When I got the information from a film,in the source I add a few more
details,

1. Name of the library or Archives (example Family History Library).
Film number and name of the film (Example 1891 matrimonios de castas)
in the citation, I add the item number if applicable.

There is a good book on the subject, very easy and inexpensive

CITE YOUR SOURCES
By Richard S. Lackey

It is a small book with lots of examples.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0878052860/ref=ase_markcy…

Saludos

susana

I would add Item number if applicable to your sources

Comment

The Genealogy Guys did a podcast, back in November. Where they talked,
about the importance of and how to cite your sources. Especially, the basic
questions, that need to be answered, when doing so. They also suggest some
excellent books.

Here is the link, to that podcast:
http://www.genealogyguys.com/index.php?post_id=33482

Mexican FHR (aka Jonathan)