FW: CONFERENCIA BINACIONAL
From: Miguel Muñoz Borrego [mailto:miguel.munoz15@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:38 PM
To: enclick@aim.com
Subject: CONFERENCIA BINACIONAL
De: Miguel Muñoz Borrego
From: Miguel Muñoz Borrego [mailto:miguel.munoz15@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:38 PM
To: enclick@aim.com
Subject: CONFERENCIA BINACIONAL
De: Miguel Muñoz Borrego
Thank you so much for this info! I have been stuck for years with this couple.
I have never been able to find either of their parents and you have solved this
for me. I am so very grateful.
Francisco Campos (19 oct 1784 ) hijo de Antonio Casimiro Campos y de Francisca Eufracia Castañeda (26 ap 1742)..nieto de Manuel de Campos y Maria Antonia Luna y de Pedro de Castañeda y Juana de Escobedo ( éstos últimos por confirmar con acta de eufracia) Antonio Campos y Eufracia se casan en TepechitlAN EL 5 MAR 1764 M60081-8 film 445047
Pedro de Castañeda (6 may 1711) hijo de Fernando de Castañeda y Antonia de Cobarrubias
Leticia Reynoso
Eufracia Castañeda era hija de Jose Manuel Castañeda y Maria Antonia de la Torre.
SALUDOS.
Hi, my name is Barb Walker Terrones. I just posted a message regarding the Terrones family. I neglected to include my URL address is:
Hello Armando, I am contemplating the Y-DNA, however, I have a
question regarding the Y-DNA, according of what I have read on
the subject, is that through the Y-DNA, it will discover a paternal
Hello Arturo,
There is no guarantee that you would be able to break through the wall with
a Y-DNA test even if you match another person. What it can do is tell you
if you have matches and if you do whether they have the same surname and it
provides you with their email address so you can ask them if they have a
tree if there isn't one on their FTDNA page. If you don't have any matches
at least you will know that the paternal line doesn't belong to any of the
ones that have tested so far. Many of them can be seen at
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/NuevaGaliciaDNA/default.aspx?secti…
and there are many others that haven't joined the project but can be seen
in other projects or in ysearch.org or SMGF.org where you can also upload
your results to try and find a match.
You would also be able to find out your haplogroup if you get the Y-DNA
test.
If you don't get the test you will never know if there is a Y-DNA match.
If you do decide to get a Y-DNA test you need to test at least 37 markers
because matches at 12 and 25 markers can be due to a common ancestor from
1,000 or more years ago. A close match at 67 markers should put the most
recent common ancestor within the past 500 years although in rare cases the
match can be from slightly further back in time.
You can also transfer your AncestryDNA raw data file to FTDNA for $39 and
see if there are autosomal DNA matches and see if they have a tree that
helps you. The transfer can be done at
https://www.familytreedna.com/AutosomalTransfer?
You can use a $15 coupon with any of the tests you purchase. The coupon
code is 15for15. I'm not sure if it can be used more than once for the same
account but just in case try ordering the tests separately if you do decide
to get the tests.
You can also try and find autosomal DNA matches by creating an account at
www.Gedmatch.com and upload your AncestryDNA raw file there. A lot of
people from 23andme, FTDNA, and AncestryDNA have uploaded their files there.
The instructions for downloading the raw DNA file from AncestryDNA can be
seen http://dna.ancestry.com/atFAQ#raw-3
Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Armando
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:21 PM, wrote:
> Hello Armando, I am contemplating the Y-DNA, however, I have a question
> regarding the Y-DNA, according of what I have read on
> the subject, is that through the Y-DNA, it will discover a paternal
> ancestor, in my case the surname de Leon. I am willing to invest the
> necessary funds, if the test will provide me with the information for me
> to break through the wall, I have encountered while researching my
> grandfather Bartolo de Leon. I have been very successful with my maternal
> ancestry surnames of Garcia, Reyes,Bocanegra, Macias, Mendoza, Tiscareno
> Ruiz
> de Esparza, de Udabe, etc of Aguascalientes, the only results I have
> encountered of the de Leon surname is from various administrators of
> ANCESTRYDNA, however, so far the claim is that the MATCH is their wives,
> husbands, etc and that is as far as it goes. I wonder if by having the
> Y-DNA test done, I would enhance my research. Thanks, Arturo -- -- -- -- --
Hello Arturo,
I had sent this message out as an email but it didn't post to this thread. If the email ever posts here I apologize for the double post.
There is no guarantee that you would be able to break through the wall with a Y-DNA test even if you match another person. What it can do is tell you if you have matches and if you do whether they have the same surname and it provides you with their email address so you can ask them if they have a tree if there isn't one on their FTDNA page. If you don't have any matches at least you will know that the paternal line doesn't belong to any of the ones that have tested so far. Many of them can be seen at https://www.familytreedna.com/public/NuevaGaliciaDNA/default.aspx?secti… and there are many others that haven't joined the project but can be seen in other projects or in ysearch.org or SMGF.org where you can also upload your results to try and find a match.
You would also be able to find out your haplogroup if you get the Y-DNA test.
If you don't get the test you will never know if there is a Y-DNA match.
If you do decide to get a Y-DNA test you need to test at least 37 markers because matches at 12 and 25 markers can be due to a common ancestor from 1,000 or more years ago. A close match at 67 markers should put the most recent common ancestor within the past 500 years although in rare cases the match can be from slightly further back in time.
You can also transfer your AncestryDNA raw data file to FTDNA for $39 and see if there are autosomal DNA matches and see if they have a tree that helps you. The transfer can be done at https://www.familytreedna.com/AutosomalTransfer?
You can use a $15 coupon with any of the tests you purchase. The coupon code is 15for15. I'm not sure if it can be used more than once for the same account but just in case try ordering the tests separately if you do decide to get the tests.
You can also try and find autosomal DNA matches by creating an account at www.Gedmatch.com and upload your AncestryDNA raw file there. A lot of people from 23andme, FTDNA, and AncestryDNA have uploaded their files there.
The instructions for downloading the raw DNA file from AncestryDNA can be seen http://dna.ancestry.com/atFAQ#raw-3
Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns about the DNA tests.
Armando
We will be making another attempt at upgrading the software on the website tonight Monday January 19, 2015. The website will be down for a few hours around 9 pm Eastern (New York) time.
We have successfully upgraded the site, resolving a number of issues that were preventing us from approving new users and making changes on the site. Not all functionalities are fully up and running so please be patient while we test and trouble shoot the remaining items.
Hemos tenido éxito en la actualización del sitio, resolviendo varios problemas que nos prevenían aprobar solicitudes para membrecía y hacer cambios al sitio. Aún no funcionan todas las partes del sitio así que pedimos su paciencia mientras hacemos pruebas y resolvemos los problemas que quedan.
Judios en Los altos I do believe that there is a high percentage of
shepardic lineage in Los altos de Jalisco. According to diario judio.
If that were true there would be a higher percentage of Y-DNA, mtDNA, and autosomal DNA that is more common among Jews than there actually is in Los Altos. Marriages between relatives happened all over the world including in the Basque Country and Ireland which are populations whose DNA is of the most distant to Jews. Marriages between relatives happened in Los Altos because people had to marry people that lived fairly close by because of lack of modern transportation and people want to stay close to friends and family. It was also because the españoles tried to marry other españoles in order to have a higher status in society.
You and the site you mentioned are trying to use coincidence and circumstantial evidence in lieu of factual or documented evidence. On this site we are supposed to try and be serious genealogists which means using documented evidence. If you have the documented evidence then many people would be very happy to see it.
Armando
I'm getting ready to add the information on Lope Ruiz de Esparza found in the book Catalago de Pasajeros a Indias Volumen VII.
The citation for Lope Ruis de Esparza, is in volume III, the entry is cited as #2.633.
The book has been digitized and is available from Family Search, but it appears you may have to go to a Family History Center to see it as the online catalog says it is "protected." Each entry has a reference to the source document in the Archivo General de Indias (for vol III, #2.633 in this case).
The introductory material explains the citations in the entries.
Thus you can cite the book as published noting the specific page and entry with the reference to the original source.
George Fulton
Would like to briefly chat with those of you researching: San Cristóbal de
la Barranca, Jalisco, Mexico.
From: "announce-request@lists.nuestrosranchos.org"
To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 5:20 PM
Subject: Anno
First time to view this microfilm and I was quickly reading through it because I want to find what I am looking for. But as I did speed reading I see that this one is starts out about:
Hi! Can anyone tell me if the name "Petra" is a nickname for something else? I just received a treasure box of genealogy research from a relative who has passed.
I have never seen that as a nickname but only as its own proper name. Perhaps she died young and the family didn't talk about her? Oftentimes I find siblings of relatives they didn't know they had because their mothers didn't want to talk about the children they had lost.
Rosalinda
Thank you, Rosalinda. The story on Petra is that after my great grandmother died in Texas, my great grandfather, Francisco, returned to Mexico to live. Petra married the widower, my great grandfather. (She married her sister's husband). This marriage was when she was in her late 30's/early 40's. The rest of the family is well documented, but she is not.
Sherri Mora
I started to pick up on going through the testament microfilm I had gone through. I was seeing “Hacienda De Tequesquite” year 1844. Saw this list of what looks like salaries of people:
In your first pictures (on the testament) it seams they are talking about a place "Alonso de la Madera" or could it be a place owned by him you probably know better, they are selling the items and mention the price at the end, I couldn't make up what were they except by "una onza de puntilla negra, se deja en un peso" (second link). Los "borseguis" (on the first link) are if I am not mistaken boots.
As for the map the 21 is "Rancho de Matorales" (Matorrales) which are bushes, hope it helps a little.
RJ Quiralta
was there any records there from colotlan/huejucar area.
Colotlan and Huejucar none so far. But it is all in Nueva Galicia (Jalisco) and Zacatecas.
Interesting? I looked up "Villa De La Purificacion" in PARS and found a 1773 map:
Ref. No. MP-MEXICO,295
http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
Wow! Has names of a number of ranchos there and I see "Hacienda De San Diego" They all have numbers.
Can someone help me out in what is the name of this Rancho with number 21:
From: Tcarahq@aol.com [mailto:Tcarahq@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 7:57 PM
To: jvc4321@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: Gen.
Erika and I have arranged for the 2nd meeting of the Nueva Galicia Genealogical Society Southern California chapter to be held on January 24, 2015.
Yo quiero ir!!
Steven Francisco Hernández López
Steven,
Email me at nggssocal@nuevagalicia.org, and I'll send you the informational flyer.
Rosalinda
ESPANOL ABAJO
Sanchez-Castellanos
Solo como comentario el hijo que tuvieron en Tlaltenango se llamo Diego de Ugarte
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15187-51312-10?cc=1804458&wc…
Y su padrino de bautizo fue Hernando de Haro y Cecilia Lopez, y si Lorenzo de Haro fue el padrino de bodas de Petronila, todo hace sospechar que los 3 eran hermanos (aun no hay pruebas)
Ademas de Petra o Petronila de Haro, hubo en la misma epoca un Tal Juan de Bojorquez y su hija llamada Maria de Saucedo que tenia mucha relacion con Thomasina de Haro y Saucedo, ya que eran compadres por bautismo y tambien compadres por la boda de su hija Maria de Saucedo y curiosamente no hay descendencia en Tlaltenago ni indicios de que hayan vivido mucho tiempo en el lugar.
Edgar Olguin Diaz
hola
arturo ramos
un cordial saludo
amigo aver si me puedes ayudar
estos son los datos que tengo de una linea de mi familia es la siguiente:
juan eligio de aro (n aprox 1738) y maria phelipa correa (aprox 1740)
hijos de esta pareja
1 rita quiteria aro correa (baut 20 may 1772) casada con juan leonicio robles de casas
matrimonio 30 de abril 1791 jerez zacatecas donde yo desciendo
2 decardia de aro n aprox 1766
3 antonio de aro n aprox 1768
4 maria micaela de aro correa baut 12 mayo 1770 jerez zac
5 maria guillerma del aro correa baut 15 feb 1774 jerez zac
6 petra nolasco aro correa baut 6 feb 1776 jerez zac}
7 juana maria eligia correa baut 15 mayo 1778 jerez zac
8 josef cresencia aro correa baut 25 abril 1780 jerez zac
9 maria francisca aro correa baut 19 marzo 1782
10 maria decideria aro correa baut 2 junio 1784 jerez zac
11 guadalupe de aro correa n aprox 1786
12 maria antonia del haro n aprox 1788
13 maria francisca de haro correa baut 25 mayo 1800 jerez zac (este ultimo pendiente)
no eh podido encontrar el matrimonio de juan eligio de aro y de maria phelipa correa
pero encontrer un matrimonio que podria ser el que ando buscando y dice lo siguiente:
juan antonio de aro sandoval y maria phelipa de jesus perez martinez
matrimonio 25 marzo 1761 en tlaltenango zacatecas
el originario del rancho laguna grande hijo lejitimo de nicolas de aro y maria efigenia sandoval ella hija lejitima de domingo peres y maria josefa martines
hijo encontrados hasta el momento:
1 juana getrudis aro peres baut 3 enero 1762 tlaltenango zacatecas
2 maria josephfa geronima aro peres baut 14 octubre 1764 tlaltenango zacatecas
espero y me puedas ayudar
te lo agradeceria mucho
buen dia
saludos
my files are on Rootsweb.com. I could not find the parents of Juan Eligio and Maria Felipa Correa but do have my information with the document film number listed of their marriage date and death date.
My file is called Mexico my base person is my Father Chet (Aniceto) Castanon. You can go to the index to find what surname you are looking for.
My paternal family is from the district of Jerez, Zac
Linda Castanon-Long
________________________________
From: "edgar_eemo@hotmail.com"
To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Who was Petronila Haro?
Edgar Olguin Diaz
hola
arturo ramos
un cordial saludo
amigo aver si me puedes ayudar
estos son los datos que tengo de una linea de mi familia es la siguiente:
juan eligio de aro (n aprox 1738) y maria phelipa correa (aprox 1740)
hijos de esta pareja
1 rita quiteria aro correa (baut 20 may 1772) casada con juan leonicio robles de casas
matrimonio 30 de abril 1791 jerez zacatecas donde yo desciendo
2 decardia de aro n aprox 1766
3 antonio de aro n aprox 1768
4 maria micaela de aro correa baut 12 mayo 1770 jerez zac
5 maria guillerma del aro correa baut 15 feb 1774 jerez zac
6 petra nolasco aro correa baut 6 feb 1776 jerez zac}
7 juana maria eligia correa baut 15 mayo 1778 jerez zac
8 josef cresencia aro correa baut 25 abril 1780 jerez zac
9 maria francisca aro correa baut 19 marzo 1782
10 maria decideria aro correa baut 2 junio 1784 jerez zac
11 guadalupe de aro correa n aprox 1786
12 maria antonia del haro n aprox 1788
13 maria francisca de haro correa baut 25 mayo 1800 jerez zac (este ultimo pendiente)
no eh podido encontrar el matrimonio de juan eligio de aro y de maria phelipa correa
pero encontrer un matrimonio que podria ser el que ando buscando y dice lo siguiente:
juan antonio de aro sandoval y maria phelipa de jesus perez martinez
matrimonio 25 marzo 1761 en tlaltenango zacatecas
el originario del rancho laguna grande hijo lejitimo de nicolas de aro y maria efigenia sandoval ella hija lejitima de domingo peres y maria josefa martines
hijo encontrados hasta el momento:
1 juana getrudis aro peres baut 3 enero 1762 tlaltenango zacatecas
2 maria josephfa geronima aro peres baut 14 octubre 1764 tlaltenango zacatecas
espero y me puedas ayudar
te lo agradeceria mucho
buen dia
saludos
En realidad, son una incógnita.
En esta ocasión no daré respuestas, si no que haré preguntas, pues el tema es para mí de interés directo.
En Tlaltenango, Pedro de Bobadilla casó con Maria de Saucedo y Haro. ¿Existirá relación entre Maria y Hernando?
Hernando de Haro, primer marido de Cecilia López de Ayala, dice ser hijo de Hernando de Haro y Bocanegra. ¿Haro y Bocanegra?
Lo del nombre de Petronila de Haro me remite a Pedro Ruíz de Haro y Leonor de Arias, en Compostela, Nayarit (la primer Guadalajara), muy conocidos por los genealogistas de la antigua Nueva Galicia, pues una hija de estos se llamó Petronila, según lo dice Pedro en su testamento otorgado el 22 de febrero de 1560, casada con Gonzalo Morillo y en segundas nupcias con Fernando Costilla y Espinoza.
quienes son padrinos de Juana, hija de Juan deAvalos y Juana de Bracamonte, en Guadalajara, en 24 de enero de 1608. ¿Esas Petronila estarán relacionadas?
Pedro Ruíz de Haro, próximo a Nuño Beltrán, padre de Petronila tuvo dos hijos naturales: Baltazar y Juan Bautista Ruíz de Haro, en cuyo testamento les deja bienes.
Saludos
GTT
Guillermo:
Segun los datos que tengo, Hendando Haro, primer marido de Cecilia Lopez de Ayala fue hijo de Juan de Miramontes y Maria (Haro y) Saucedo. La primera esposa de este Hernando Haro fue Maria Gonzalez de Mendoza y con ella tuvo un hijo, Nicolas Haro, quien fue presbitero y en sus declaraciones de merito para su ordenacion declara ser hijo de Hernando Haro Bocanegra y bisnieto de Pedro Bobadilla y Maria de Saucedo.
Queda claro que Maria (Haro y) Saucedo, madre de Hernando Haro, Lorenzo de Miramontes y Juan de Miramontes fue descendiente de Pedro Bobadilla y Maria Saucedo... probablemente su nieta ya que se acostumbraba llamar a las hijas mayores por sus abuelas maternas, incluso con el mismo apellido.
Que tuviera un hijo llamado Hernando de Haro, igual que el capitan fundador de Compostela y marido de Doña Teresa de Colio y de la Torre, y posiblemente una hija o sobrina llamada Petronila Haro nos deja postular con bastante certidumbre que Maria (Haro y) Saucedo y su hermana Ana de Saucedo fueron descendiente de los Haro de Compostela. Sabemos que tambien fueron descendientes de Juan Delgado, encomendero de El Teul.
Ver esta nota:
Carlos Peredo
Estimado don Guillermo y demás estimados miembros de este foro,
Con el gran gusto de saludarlos de nuevo, me comunico con ustedes en esta ocasión para preguntarles si han tenido avances en el estudio de los Ruíz de Haro y los Ruiz de Velasco y Haro que poblaron Compostela y Nueva Galicia?
He invertido un buen número de horas y fatiga de mis ojos tratando de encontrar algún parentesco entre esas familias y al momento no he tenido ningún exito.
He visto aquí en este foro que se logró establecer la ascendencia de Baltazar, Diego, Bartolomé y Ana Temiño de Bañuelos y Velasco; trabajo que me pareció emocionante y que los hace nietos de Sancha Velasco y bisnietos de Sancho Sánchez de Velasco Sr. de Arnedo y de Nieva que fue hermano del primer conde de Nieva y padre de la segunda y la tercera condesas de NIeva. Sancho fue también hijo del primer conde de Haro Don Pedro Fernández de Velasco.
Sin embargo, no he encontrado ningún trabajo que ligue a esa ilustre familia con dos
Pedros Ruíz de Haro - al menos uno de los dos es mi ascendiente - y son:
Don Pedro Ruíz de Haro nacido en Peñaranda que fue conquistador junto a Nuño de Guzmán y aparece como escribano en Compostela por 1540 y que varios libros menciona que descendía de la gran Casa de Guzmán y que en una intervención de Don Guillermo Tovar de Teresa en este foro menciona testó en 1560 en Compostela.
También Don Guillermo nos comunica, que tuvo dos hijos naturales que reconoce en dicho testamento y tres hijas legítimas habidas con su esposa Leonor Arias.
En dicho testamento declara ser hijo de Pedro de Haro y de Francisca Muñóz vecinos de Peñaranda y también declara que le deja a su hija Petronila un vínculo que tenía en la Villa de Aza.
El otro es Don Pedro Ruíz de Velasco y Haro que casa con Ana Núñez Bojorquez por 1610 y fueron padres entre otros hijos de : María Ruíz de Velasco Núñez que nació por 1630 en Ayo y casó en 1653 en León, Gto. con Cristóbal Hernández Gamiño de los cuales desciendo en mi línea paterna.
En mis intentos de encontrar la cadena que pudiera unir ambos personajes revisé mucha información referente al Señorío de Aza y me maravilló descubrir que a pesar de que hoy en día Aza es una Villa insignificante, de ella desciende prácticamente TODA la nobleza española. Hecho que hace más interesante el encontrar porqué el conquistador Pedro Ruíz de Haro tenía un vínculo en dicha Villa, es decir, en un inicio TODA la Villa (que fundó Fernán González y que llegó a ser una ciudad importantísima de más de seis mil habitantes en la edad media)perteneció a Gonzalo Fernández , hijo del famoso Conde Fernán González, y llevó el título de Conde de Aza y de Lara.
Encontré en esa busqueda, que los suscecivos descendientes de Fernán González fueron dividiendo la villa entre sus herederos, de tal manera que por ejemplo, un bisnieto de Fernán González llamado Alvar Fernández se reporta como Señor de Marañón y de PARTES DE AZA!
Más adelante, un 4o nieto de Fernán, Ordoño García aparece como Señor de PARTE DE AZA, quien con María García de Villamayor fue padre de Gonzalo Ordóñez, V Maestre de Santiago en 1203.
Luego un sobrino de dicho Ordoño llamado Garcí Fernández de Villamayor Señor de PARTE DE AZA, casado con Mayor ARIAS, intercambia todo lo que tenía en AZA en 1269 a cambio de Amusco, Melgarejo y Castrojeriz.
Un sobrino de dicho Garcí: Gómez García, Señor de Aza y de Roa que fué alférez del Rey hasta 1183 en que es destituido y se nombra para tal cargo a DIEGO LÓPEZ DE HARO.
Dicho Gómez García aparece como dueño DE LA MAYORÍA DE AZA; más adelanate, un bisnieto de él, Gil Gómez de Roa, Señor de Aza y de Yscar, dona Yscar en 1271
Y por fín, una nieta de Gómez García llamada Elvira González de Aza casa con Lope Martínez 2 señor de Avellaneda y al parecer es así como llega a resultar la Villa de Aza entre las villas de los Condes de Miranda : Los Avellaneda que en el s. XVI menciona en su testamento Don Pedro Ruíz de Haro al señalar que el nació en la Villa de Peñaranda que es del Conde de Miranda y que tiene un Vínculo en la Villa de Aza que es del Conde de Miranda.
Por lo investigado puedo decir que el Conde de Miranda en 1560 (año del multicitado testamento)era "dueño simbólicamente" de la Villa de Aza ya que ésta se había ido dividiendo a través de los siglos ya que -a manera de otro ejemplo-una hermana de Gómez García, el que había heredado la MAYORÍA DE AZA, llamada Mayor García casada con Gonzalo Marañón por 1159 y que en 1173 aparece como Conde, se reporta como heredera de PARTE DE AZA Y PARTE DE ACEVES, y ya viuda en 1182 LEGA EN COMPAÑÍA DE SUS HIJOS TODO LO QUE TENÍA EN AZA Y EN ACEVES!!
Así que una de las tantas partes en que se dividió Aza en esos seis siglos desde su fundación fue a ser heredada por Don Pedro Ruíz de Haro lo que me hace suponer que debió ser por fuerza descendiente de Fernán González pero no he podido aún encontrar a sus abuelos, dato que seguramente lo entroncaría con alguno de los muchos "Señores de Aza"
Por lo que toca a la Nueva España, supongo que fué abuelo o tío del genearca Pedro Ruíz de Haro y Velasco cuyos descendientes se extendieron por los Altos de Jalisco.
Ojalá ya alguno de los estudiosos miembros de este foro haya tenido éxito con los mencionados Pedros, ó que al menos sirva el presente para despertar la curiosidad para ahondar en el tema.
Un gran saludo para todos
-----Original Message-----
From: arturo.ramos2
To: research
Sent: Sat, Sep 25, 2010 9:43 am
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Who was Petronila Haro? Quien fue Petronila
Haro?
ESPANOL ABAJO
In gathering information on the Haro and Miramontes clan of Tlaltenango
for my
upcoming book, I have run across a family that I have been unable to
connect to
the rest of the Haros. The family is that of Petronila Haro, married
to Juan de
Ugarte in 1626. The family had a son in Tlaltenango (Pedro Ugarte) in
1631,
before moving to Hidalgo del Parral sometime before 1641, when they had
another
son (Tomas de Ugarte).
Does anyone have information on this family? Could this be a sister of
Hernando
Haro and Lorenzo Haro (who was a sponsor at her wedding)?
ESPANOL
En la recopilacion de infomacion de la familia Haro y Miramontes de
Tlaltenango
para mi libro, he encontrado una familia que no he podido vincular al
resto de
los Haros. La familia es la de Petronila Haro, casada con Juan de
Ugarte en
1626. La familia procreo un hijo en Tlaltenango (Pedro Ugarte) en 1631
antes de
mudarse a Hidalgo del Parral antes de 1641, cuando procrearon otro hijo
(Tomas
de Ugarte).
Alguien tiene informacion sobre esta familia? Podria ser Petronila una
hermana
de Hernando Haro y de Lorenzo Haro (quien fue padrino en su boda)?
Hi,
Are there any meetings coming up? I'm afraid I'm not getting announcements.
Thanks,
Laura
>
> Hi Rosa,
>
Long time no see. I am looking forward to seeing you and Jaime at the
meeting! I'm so glad you can attend.
Hola Maria,
Me acuerdo yo de ti. Hace tiempo que nos comunicamos por e-mail. Yo vivo en
Sacramento, CA y recuerdo que tu vives en Texas, no? Tal vez un dia tendré
el placer de conocerte en persona.
Maria Cortez (con zeta)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:05:38 +0000 (UTC)
> From: gonzalez.rosa@comcast.net
> To: announce@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
> Message-ID:
> <807937629.7560341.1420679138452.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi Maria!
> My husband Jaime and I will be there:) Thanks for all you do for all of us!
> Rosa
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Maria Cortes"
> To: "announce@nuestrosranchos.org"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 5:39:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
>
> Maria de donde eres? Yo me llamo Maria Cortez tanbien
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Laura,
>
There is a meeting coming up on January 17th in Sacramento. I will be
sending the agenda to the group shortly and you should receive the e-mail.
I corrected your e-mail address, which was bouncing previously because of a
typo.
You can also check our website where the meeting announcements are posted
at: http://www.nuevagalicia.org
I hope to see you on the 17th!
Maria Cortez
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:48:52 -0800 (PST)
> From: mayangrl@sonic.net
> To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
> Message-ID:
> &nid=22616&pid=0&cid=&uid=5960&tid=&
> 5a78f1d526e0a3c8b4f759968b660b8c@www.nuestrosranchos.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any meetings coming up? I'm afraid I'm not getting
> announcements.
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
Maria de donde eres? Yo me llamo Maria Cortez tanbien
Maria Cortes (HRIS Administrator)
Trinity Industries
Maria.Cortes@trin.net
Phone 214-589-8036
Fax 214-589-8810
-----Original Message-----
From: Announce [mailto:announce-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of mcortez
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:46 PM
To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
>
> Hi Laura,
>
There is a meeting coming up on January 17th in Sacramento. I will be sending the agenda to the group shortly and you should receive the e-mail.
I corrected your e-mail address, which was bouncing previously because of a typo.
You can also check our website where the meeting announcements are posted
at: http://www.nuevagalicia.org
I hope to see you on the 17th!
Maria Cortez
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:48:52 -0800 (PST)
> From: mayangrl@sonic.net
> To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
> Message-ID:
> &nid=22616&pid=0&cid=&uid=5960&tid=&
> 5a78f1d526e0a3c8b4f759968b660b8c@www.nuestrosranchos.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any meetings coming up? I'm afraid I'm not getting
> announcements.
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
Hi Maria!
My husband Jaime and I will be there:) Thanks for all you do for all of us!
Rosa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maria Cortes"
To: "announce@nuestrosranchos.org"
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 5:39:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
Maria de donde eres? Yo me llamo Maria Cortez tanbien
Maria Cortes (HRIS Administrator)
Trinity Industries
Maria.Cortes@trin.net
Phone 214-589-8036
Fax 214-589-8810
-----Original Message-----
From: Announce [mailto:announce-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of mcortez
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:46 PM
To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
>
> Hi Laura,
>
There is a meeting coming up on January 17th in Sacramento. I will be sending the agenda to the group shortly and you should receive the e-mail.
I corrected your e-mail address, which was bouncing previously because of a typo.
You can also check our website where the meeting announcements are posted
at: http://www.nuevagalicia.org
I hope to see you on the 17th!
Maria Cortez
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:48:52 -0800 (PST)
> From: mayangrl@sonic.net
> To: announce@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] NorCal Genealogy Meetings
> Message-ID:
> &nid=22616&pid=0&cid=&uid=5960&tid=&
> 5a78f1d526e0a3c8b4f759968b660b8c@www.nuestrosranchos.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any meetings coming up? I'm afraid I'm not getting
> announcements.
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
This format of padrones for year 1779 is interesting. It lists all kinds of clases of people under the caste system. Here is one page to show:
Found this one that is the Tesoro de Moctezuma:
Reference number:
PATRONATO,17,R.9
http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
The title of it is: Contrato de Martin Cortes con el Rey: Tesoro De Moctezuma 1575
This is interesting. Check this section out of the pages of the padrones of 1779:
I am looking at the PARS archives:
Did search: Tierras
Here is another one:
Carta de Cristóbal Colón al papa Alejandro VI informando de sus viajes y solicitándole religiosos para enviarlos a las tierras descubiertas.
1502
Reference number: PATRONATO,295,N.44
Hello group,
Are B2 and B4'5 mtDNA the same? My brother tested B2 (with NatGeo) and I B4'5 (with FTDNA).
Hello Alice,
It took me a while to find this information because it is buried in different websites.
B4'5 is found on the mtDNA tree Build 14 (5 Apr 2012) at http://www.phylotree.org/previous_builds.htm
According to the following site http://www.isogg.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA_tests FTDNA is using Build 14 and the Genographic Project is using Build 13 or 14.
In the mtDNA tree Build 14 (5 Apr 2012) B2 is below (more recent than) B4'5. B2 is defined by mutations at 3547, 4977, 6473, 9950, and 11177 according to mtDNA tree Build 14. Since B2 is below B4'5 the Geno 2.0 test result is more accurate.
The people you see in Family Finder that have B2 have either had a $199.00 mtFull Sequence test or they have transferred their Geno 2.0 test results to FTDNA.
Saludos,
Armando
Can an autosomal DNA test find ancestors? I'm trying to determine which
test to have my grandmother take. We don't know much about either side
other than one parent is from Jalisco and the other is from Sonora.
Ideally, I'd like to know her paternal line but she doesn't have any living
male siblings. So, I'm wondering what information I could get from an
autosomal test. And, whether, there might be a more useful test.
Paige
Did she ever have any male siblings? If she did, did they have any male
children as in Nephews, sons of her brothers. If she did, they can take the
Y DNA tests.
Alicia
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Paige Herrera
wrote:
> Can an autosomal DNA test find ancestors? I'm trying to determine which
> test to have my grandmother take. We don't know much about either side
> other than one parent is from Jalisco and the other is from Sonora.
> Ideally, I'd like to know her paternal line but she doesn't have any living
> male siblings. So, I'm wondering what information I could get from an
> autosomal test. And, whether, there might be a more useful test.
>
> Paige
The two brothers were older and between them had seven children, six
females and one male. Only five females are still alive. I don't think I'll
be able to find anyone to take a yDNA test, but, I'm interested in knowing
if I can use an autosomal test to determine ancestry.
Paige
In your situation - you can use an autosomal test to determine ancestry
only if you are lucky enough to get a close match to your grandmother and
that close match has a tree and they answer your email and they have other
relatives wiling to test also in order to triangulate. It is unlikely that
will happen, but you don't know if it will happen unless you get the test.
Most of your grandmother's matches will probably be from northern Mexico
since more people from that region get tested and you will have a slightly
better chance of getting a close match with someone from that region. There
will be some matches that are from Jalisco, Aguascalientes, and Zacatecas
and they will be very distantly related to he and unless what I described
in the first paragraph happens it will hard to prove how your grandmother
is related to them.
Most matches that show up are distant relatives since some segments can be
carried down for 10-12 generations. See the post at
http://gcbias.org/2013/11/11/how-does-your-number-of-genetic-ancestors-…
Armando
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Paige Herrera
wrote:
> The two brothers were older and between them had seven children, six
> females and one male. Only five females are still alive. I don't think I'll
> be able to find anyone to take a yDNA test, but, I'm interested in knowing
> if I can use an autosomal test to determine ancestry.
>
> Paige
Paige,
You can find ancestors with an autosomal test only if a person related to
your grandmother within 4 or 5 generations has also tested, shows as a
match, and responds to emails. Unfortunately, there aren't any other tests
that she can take. As Alicia said if there is a male nephew from a brother
of your grandmother then they could get a Y37 or Y67 test.
Armando
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Paige Herrera
wrote:
> Can an autosomal DNA test find ancestors? I'm trying to determine which
> test to have my grandmother take. We don't know much about either side
> other than one parent is from Jalisco and the other is from Sonora.
> Ideally, I'd like to know her paternal line but she doesn't have any living
> male siblings. So, I'm wondering what information I could get from an
> autosomal test. And, whether, there might be a more useful test.
>
> Paige
Paige,
I don't know what kind of a test I took with the FamilyDNA lab, but ever since, I have been receiving messages from them from time to time that they have found other testers that match me. They are always from New Mexico, where my mother was from (she was descended from Pueblo tribes). I find it hard to navigate the website, and lately due to illness I have not tried to access the list, but I have messages piled up. Some on the list have familiar surnames, and some are even male. In the past when I tried to contact some, I have never received an answer. I wanted to see their family trees.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 18:23:17 -0600
> From: fandemma@gmail.com
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] DNA
>
> Paige,
>
> You can find ancestors with an autosomal test only if a person related to
> your grandmother within 4 or 5 generations has also tested, shows as a
> match, and responds to emails. Unfortunately, there aren't any other tests
> that she can take. As Alicia said if there is a male nephew from a brother
> of your grandmother then they could get a Y37 or Y67 test.
>
> Armando
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Paige Herrera
> wrote:
>
> > Can an autosomal DNA test find ancestors? I'm trying to determine which
> > test to have my grandmother take. We don't know much about either side
> > other than one parent is from Jalisco and the other is from Sonora.
> > Ideally, I'd like to know her paternal line but she doesn't have any living
> > male siblings. So, I'm wondering what information I could get from an
> > autosomal test. And, whether, there might be a more useful test.
> >
> > Paige
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Mitochondrial DNA doesn't mutate as fast as Y-DNA and therefore it is hard
to use as a genealogical tool, especially since surnames of the women
change every generation. There have been some success stories such as
descendants of some Spanish women in Jalisco but there were trees to
accompany the DNA in those rare cases.
The only thing you can do is purchase the tests and expect the worst but
hope for the best.
Armando
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Paige Herrera
wrote:
> Armando,
>
> I saw family finder has the autosomal and you can add an mtDNA for $69.00.
> Would that help narrow the results?
>
> Paige
I don't know if this means anything, but my first result from FTDNA was B4'5. It was later changed to B2.
Laura Gonzalez
When I'm filling out forms that ask for ethnicity I always feel a bit conflicted when I check "White" and leave the "Hispanic Origin" blank.
What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most. I'm white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or his family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel white, tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for ethnic white (Italian, etc.).
OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity is a separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native American for race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm haplogroup B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that for race.
Laura Gonzalez
Laura,
I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as Native
American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7% East
Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
Alicia
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most. I'm
> white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents
> divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or his
> family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel white,
> tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for ethnic
> white (Italian, etc.).
>
> OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity is a
> separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native American for
> race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm haplogroup
> B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that for
> race.
>
>
>
>
> Laura Gonzalez
Your 7% East Asian actually comes from your Native American ancestry and if
you have any Northern Siberian in your European it is most likely from your
Native American ancestry also. So your Native American is actually at least
30% which is close to the average for the Jalisco, Aguas, Zacatecas region.
23andme, AncestryDNA, and Gedmatch do a better job of calculating the
Native American because they included Native American populations that
FamilyTreeDNA did not include such as Pima, Mayan, and Colombian. You'll
notice that they are missing in the report at
https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
Armando
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alicia Carrillo
wrote:
> Laura,
> I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as Native
> American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
> therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7% East
> Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
>
> Alicia
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
>
> > What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most. I'm
> > white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents
> > divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or his
> > family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel
> white,
> > tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for ethnic
> > white (Italian, etc.).
> >
> > OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity is a
> > separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native American
> for
> > race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm
> haplogroup
> > B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that for
> > race.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Laura Gonzalez
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Armando, the 7% North East Asia is actually focused on Korea and Japan, the
5% Central South Asian is focused in India. The 2% West Africa is over
Cameroon/Nigeria and the 1% East Central Africa's focus is Kenya/Tanzania
and the 3% Middle Eastern is Morocco/Tunisia. The 59% European is Southern
Europe, primarily Italy and Sicily, followed by Albania, Greece Portugal
and Spain.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Armando wrote:
> Your 7% East Asian actually comes from your Native American ancestry and if
> you have any Northern Siberian in your European it is most likely from your
> Native American ancestry also. So your Native American is actually at least
> 30% which is close to the average for the Jalisco, Aguas, Zacatecas region.
>
> 23andme, AncestryDNA, and Gedmatch do a better job of calculating the
> Native American because they included Native American populations that
> FamilyTreeDNA did not include such as Pima, Mayan, and Colombian. You'll
> notice that they are missing in the report at
>
> https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
>
> Armando
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alicia Carrillo
> wrote:
>
> > Laura,
> > I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as Native
> > American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
> > therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7%
> East
> > Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
> >
> > Alicia
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> >
> > > What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most. I'm
> > > white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents
> > > divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or his
> > > family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel
> > white,
> > > tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for ethnic
> > > white (Italian, etc.).
> > >
> > > OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity is
> a
> > > separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native American
> > for
> > > race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm
> > haplogroup
> > > B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that
> for
> > > race.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Laura Gonzalez
> > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > >
> > > To post, send email to:
> > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Alicia, I was well aware of where the Northeast Asia and others are
focused. The problem is the methodology that FTDNA didn't use and the
methodology that 23andme, Ancestry, Gedmatch, Geno 2.0, Dodecad, Eurogenes,
MDLP, and Harrapaworld did use. Since FTDNA didn't use enough Native
American populations they didn't have enough Native American autosomal SNPs
to compare your DNA with and therefore they split your Native American DNA
into 2 or more regions where the DNA match due to the lack of a closer
match.
Anyone that has at least one Mexican parent and has tested with another
company other than FTDNA will have more Native American in their results.
Are we to believe that those other companies and Gedmatch calculators have
incorrect results and only FTDNA has the correct results? That's very
doubtful especially when they used fewer populations and the other
companies also consist of leading scientists such as Spencer Wells. FTDNA
didn't even include the Maya or Pima of which both have Native American
autosomal DNA yet the other companies and calculators did include those
populations.
You can see a spreadsheet of several people (names removed) that have
tested with several companies and you can see their results in it. To get a
good result for the FTDNA myOrigins results the Northeast Asia had to be
added to the total.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f4wiwm6rhswhr7d/Amerindian%20Comparison.xlsx?…
Those are just a few of the results I have seen from people that have
tested with multiple companies. I have seen results from many others.
You should upload your results to Gedmatch and use the Admixture
calculators so you can see the difference with the exact same FTDNA files.
AncestryDNA http://dna.ancestry.com/ has a sale right now for $79 and if
you get the test you will also see more Native American with the results
from that test.
The best way to learn about these results is to compare with others and
with different companies.
To the readers of the blog -
Is there anyone else willing to share their Native American and East Asian
results from FTDNA and another company?
Armando
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alicia Carrillo
wrote:
> Armando, the 7% North East Asia is actually focused on Korea and Japan, the
> 5% Central South Asian is focused in India. The 2% West Africa is over
> Cameroon/Nigeria and the 1% East Central Africa's focus is Kenya/Tanzania
> and the 3% Middle Eastern is Morocco/Tunisia. The 59% European is Southern
> Europe, primarily Italy and Sicily, followed by Albania, Greece Portugal
> and Spain.
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Armando wrote:
>
> > Your 7% East Asian actually comes from your Native American ancestry and
> if
> > you have any Northern Siberian in your European it is most likely from
> your
> > Native American ancestry also. So your Native American is actually at
> least
> > 30% which is close to the average for the Jalisco, Aguas, Zacatecas
> region.
> >
> > 23andme, AncestryDNA, and Gedmatch do a better job of calculating the
> > Native American because they included Native American populations that
> > FamilyTreeDNA did not include such as Pima, Mayan, and Colombian. You'll
> > notice that they are missing in the report at
> >
> >
> https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
> >
> > Armando
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alicia Carrillo
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Laura,
> > > I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as Native
> > > American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
> > > therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7%
> > East
> > > Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
> > >
> > > Alicia
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > > > What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most.
> I'm
> > > > white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents
> > > > divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or
> his
> > > > family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel
> > > white,
> > > > tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for
> ethnic
> > > > white (Italian, etc.).
> > > >
> > > > OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity
> is
> > a
> > > > separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native
> American
> > > for
> > > > race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm
> > > haplogroup
> > > > B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that
> > for
> > > > race.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Laura Gonzalez
> > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > > >
> > > > To post, send email to:
> > > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > >
> > > To post, send email to:
> > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Thanks Armando for this very detailed explanation, meaning that we can't
take all of this as 100% factual. Maybe one day they will get it right, or
if not right, get it a bit closer.
Alicia
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Armando wrote:
> Alicia, I was well aware of where the Northeast Asia and others are
> focused. The problem is the methodology that FTDNA didn't use and the
> methodology that 23andme, Ancestry, Gedmatch, Geno 2.0, Dodecad, Eurogenes,
> MDLP, and Harrapaworld did use. Since FTDNA didn't use enough Native
> American populations they didn't have enough Native American autosomal SNPs
> to compare your DNA with and therefore they split your Native American DNA
> into 2 or more regions where the DNA match due to the lack of a closer
> match.
>
> Anyone that has at least one Mexican parent and has tested with another
> company other than FTDNA will have more Native American in their results.
> Are we to believe that those other companies and Gedmatch calculators have
> incorrect results and only FTDNA has the correct results? That's very
> doubtful especially when they used fewer populations and the other
> companies also consist of leading scientists such as Spencer Wells. FTDNA
> didn't even include the Maya or Pima of which both have Native American
> autosomal DNA yet the other companies and calculators did include those
> populations.
>
> You can see a spreadsheet of several people (names removed) that have
> tested with several companies and you can see their results in it. To get a
> good result for the FTDNA myOrigins results the Northeast Asia had to be
> added to the total.
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f4wiwm6rhswhr7d/Amerindian%20Comparison.xlsx?…
>
> Those are just a few of the results I have seen from people that have
> tested with multiple companies. I have seen results from many others.
>
> You should upload your results to Gedmatch and use the Admixture
> calculators so you can see the difference with the exact same FTDNA files.
> AncestryDNA http://dna.ancestry.com/ has a sale right now for $79 and if
> you get the test you will also see more Native American with the results
> from that test.
>
> The best way to learn about these results is to compare with others and
> with different companies.
>
>
> To the readers of the blog -
>
> Is there anyone else willing to share their Native American and East Asian
> results from FTDNA and another company?
>
> Armando
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alicia Carrillo
> wrote:
>
> > Armando, the 7% North East Asia is actually focused on Korea and Japan,
> the
> > 5% Central South Asian is focused in India. The 2% West Africa is over
> > Cameroon/Nigeria and the 1% East Central Africa's focus is Kenya/Tanzania
> > and the 3% Middle Eastern is Morocco/Tunisia. The 59% European is
> Southern
> > Europe, primarily Italy and Sicily, followed by Albania, Greece Portugal
> > and Spain.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Armando wrote:
> >
> > > Your 7% East Asian actually comes from your Native American ancestry
> and
> > if
> > > you have any Northern Siberian in your European it is most likely from
> > your
> > > Native American ancestry also. So your Native American is actually at
> > least
> > > 30% which is close to the average for the Jalisco, Aguas, Zacatecas
> > region.
> > >
> > > 23andme, AncestryDNA, and Gedmatch do a better job of calculating the
> > > Native American because they included Native American populations that
> > > FamilyTreeDNA did not include such as Pima, Mayan, and Colombian.
> You'll
> > > notice that they are missing in the report at
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
> > >
> > > Armando
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alicia Carrillo <
> allieavelar@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Laura,
> > > > I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as
> Native
> > > > American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
> > > > therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7%
> > > East
> > > > Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
> > > >
> > > > Alicia
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most.
> > I'm
> > > > > white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my
> parents
> > > > > divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or
> > his
> > > > > family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not
> feel
> > > > white,
> > > > > tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for
> > ethnic
> > > > > white (Italian, etc.).
> > > > >
> > > > > OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity
> > is
> > > a
> > > > > separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native
> > American
> > > > for
> > > > > race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm
> > > > haplogroup
> > > > > B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking
> that
> > > for
> > > > > race.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Laura Gonzalez
> > > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > > > >
> > > > > To post, send email to:
> > > > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > > > >
> > > > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > > >
> > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > > >
> > > > To post, send email to:
> > > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > >
> > > To post, send email to:
> > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Armando thank you for your explanation on this topic, it was so obvious once I read it but I couldn't see the forest because of the trees.
Ancestry has my Native American at 8% and Finland and Northwest Russia at 1% and FTDNA has Native American at 5% with East Asian at 2% and Finland and Northern Siberia at 4%.
Randy McNeal
Armando,
I am confused: You said in the e-mail below that Spencer Wells, Phd, (whose name is familiar to me) is not at FamilyTreeDNA? I believe the lab at FamilyTreeDNA handles the tests for Genographic.
Dr. Spencer actually works with Mr. Greenspan, CEO of FamilyTreeDNA, as part of his team, and he sits on the advisory board. Mr. Greenspan said he would ask someone on his team to look into getting more Native American samples, but he mentioned someone else, whose name I can't recall now. I know how hard it is to get Natives to test, even those in the US, because of their beliefs and internal politics.
See link below about "Who is Who at FamilyTreeDNA:
https://www.familytreedna.com/about.aspx
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 12:55:48 -0600
> From: fandemma@gmail.com
> To: general@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] What to mark for ethnicity
>
> Alicia, I was well aware of where the Northeast Asia and others are
> focused. The problem is the methodology that FTDNA didn't use and the
> methodology that 23andme, Ancestry, Gedmatch, Geno 2.0, Dodecad, Eurogenes,
> MDLP, and Harrapaworld did use. Since FTDNA didn't use enough Native
> American populations they didn't have enough Native American autosomal SNPs
> to compare your DNA with and therefore they split your Native American DNA
> into 2 or more regions where the DNA match due to the lack of a closer
> match.
>
> Anyone that has at least one Mexican parent and has tested with another
> company other than FTDNA will have more Native American in their results.
> Are we to believe that those other companies and Gedmatch calculators have
> incorrect results and only FTDNA has the correct results? That's very
> doubtful especially when they used fewer populations and the other
> companies also consist of leading scientists such as Spencer Wells. FTDNA
> didn't even include the Maya or Pima of which both have Native American
> autosomal DNA yet the other companies and calculators did include those
> populations.
>
> You can see a spreadsheet of several people (names removed) that have
> tested with several companies and you can see their results in it. To get a
> good result for the FTDNA myOrigins results the Northeast Asia had to be
> added to the total.
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f4wiwm6rhswhr7d/Amerindian%20Comparison.xlsx?…
>
> Those are just a few of the results I have seen from people that have
> tested with multiple companies. I have seen results from many others.
>
> You should upload your results to Gedmatch and use the Admixture
> calculators so you can see the difference with the exact same FTDNA files.
> AncestryDNA http://dna.ancestry.com/ has a sale right now for $79 and if
> you get the test you will also see more Native American with the results
> from that test.
>
> The best way to learn about these results is to compare with others and
> with different companies.
>
>
> To the readers of the blog -
>
> Is there anyone else willing to share their Native American and East Asian
> results from FTDNA and another company?
>
> Armando
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alicia Carrillo
> wrote:
>
> > Armando, the 7% North East Asia is actually focused on Korea and Japan, the
> > 5% Central South Asian is focused in India. The 2% West Africa is over
> > Cameroon/Nigeria and the 1% East Central Africa's focus is Kenya/Tanzania
> > and the 3% Middle Eastern is Morocco/Tunisia. The 59% European is Southern
> > Europe, primarily Italy and Sicily, followed by Albania, Greece Portugal
> > and Spain.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Armando wrote:
> >
> > > Your 7% East Asian actually comes from your Native American ancestry and
> > if
> > > you have any Northern Siberian in your European it is most likely from
> > your
> > > Native American ancestry also. So your Native American is actually at
> > least
> > > 30% which is close to the average for the Jalisco, Aguas, Zacatecas
> > region.
> > >
> > > 23andme, AncestryDNA, and Gedmatch do a better job of calculating the
> > > Native American because they included Native American populations that
> > > FamilyTreeDNA did not include such as Pima, Mayan, and Colombian. You'll
> > > notice that they are missing in the report at
> > >
> > >
> > https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
> > >
> > > Armando
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alicia Carrillo
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Laura,
> > > > I too have resorted to marking documents that ask for my race as Native
> > > > American. My Autosomal DNA says I'm 23% Native American or New World,
> > > > therefore my statement is truthful. It also says I'm 59% European, 7%
> > > East
> > > > Asian, 3% Middle Eastern and 3% African.
> > > >
> > > > Alicia
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What you mark would be based on what group you relate to the most.
> > I'm
> > > > > white on my father's side, Mexican on my mother's. Since my parents
> > > > > divorced when I was very young, and I never had contact with him or
> > his
> > > > > family, I identify as Mexican, Chicana to be be exact. I do not feel
> > > > white,
> > > > > tho physically I don't really look Mexican, and I could pass for
> > ethnic
> > > > > white (Italian, etc.).
> > > > >
> > > > > OTOH, I have, until recently, marked white for race, when ethnicity
> > is
> > > a
> > > > > separate question. Some of my more radical friends mark Native
> > American
> > > > for
> > > > > race, and I've started doing that too. I figured that since I'm
> > > > haplogroup
> > > > > B2 and Mexican culture is mainly Indian, that I'd start marking that
> > > for
> > > > > race.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Laura Gonzalez
> > > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > > > >
> > > > > To post, send email to:
> > > > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > > > >
> > > > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > > >
> > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > > >
> > > > To post, send email to:
> > > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > >
> > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> > >
> > > To post, send email to:
> > > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
Emilie, Spencer Wells didn't create myOrigins. Razib Khan and Rui Hu did.
Their names are at the top of the myOrigins White Paper.
https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/family-finder-pages/myorigins-metho…
Spencer Wells is the head scientist over the National Geographic
Genographic project.
When they say it is hard to get Natives to test they are talking about
Natives without even 1% Native American ancestry. The Maya and Pima
populations show a tiny bit of European ancestry and that is why Razib Khan
didn't use that population and it is why myOrigins is under reporting the
Native American ancestry. When they it is hard to get Natives to test the
talk more about Natives from what is now the U.S. and they are the ones
that don't want to test. The Native Americans of Mexico aren't against
being tested.
You can see the National Geographic Genographic results of Amerindian
(Mexico) at
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations/
Then compare it to the Mexican-American population in that same page.
You can also see a tiny bit of European ancestry in the Moreno et al study
that has been talked about here before. Go to the following page and create
free account then download the PDF then go to page 31 to see the results of
Native populations using a program called ADMIXTURE.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6189/1280/suppl/DC1
You'll see that at K=2 Native Mexicans have small amounts of green which is
the European ancestry.
Also notice that Carlos Bustamante's name is in the list of authors. The
populations in that study are the ones that were used in the Jessica Alba
episode of Finding Your Roots and Carlos Bustamante was interviewed in that
episode.
Armando
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Emilie Garcia
wrote:
> Armando,
>
> I am confused: You said in the e-mail below that Spencer Wells, Phd,
> (whose name is familiar to me) is not at FamilyTreeDNA? I believe the
> lab at FamilyTreeDNA handles the tests for Genographic.
>
> Dr. Spencer actually works with Mr. Greenspan, CEO of FamilyTreeDNA, as
> part of his team, and he sits on the advisory board. Mr. Greenspan said
> he would ask someone on his team to look into getting more Native American
> samples, but he mentioned someone else, whose name I can't recall now. I
> know how hard it is to get Natives to test, even those in the US, because
> of their beliefs and internal politics.
>
> See link below about "Who is Who at FamilyTreeDNA:
>
> https://www.familytreedna.com/about.aspx
>
> Emilie
> Port Orchard, WA
>
>
FTDNA:
European 56% (British Isles 52%, Southern Europe 4%)
East Asian 23% (SE Asia 16%, NE Asia 7%)
New World (Native American 10%)
Central Asia 5%
African (West Africa) 4%
ME (North African 3%)
Ancestry:
European 56% (British Isles 18%, Ireland 16% Scandinavia 9%, Iberia 5%)
Asian 18% (E Asia 14%, South Asia 4%)
Native American 15%
African 6% (Bantu 4%, North African 1%)
Polynesia 5%
So, for Native American,
FTDNA: 33%
Ancestry: 33%
I thought I read somewhere that central Asia might be Roma people, probably via Spain.
Laura Gonzalez
Jose Ignacio Anaya Gomez Hello Mr , Ms scompton I congratulate you for trying to find your roots . I went through the same process when I lived in USA for a short time .when I had to fill any document and they asked me my race I could not answer even though i knew that being Mexican is a nationality not a race they did not know it and ended by saying , race - other .
that's your choice. race is a social construct, hence why people don't define races such as 'white', 'black' etc. all the same.
First, thank you Katy for the indexes to Huejucar!
i think familysearch has changed the names of their collection since i finished that index.
but here's the record you are looking for
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-11180-46626-53?cc=1874591&wc…
and here's the tree
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-11180-47286-63?cc=1874591&wc…
also here's the tree for felipe and maria de leon's marriage record
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-11180-45271-32?cc=1874591&wc…
I am looking for specific family members in the 1930 Mexico Census for Guadalajarita, Zacatecas. However, after looking over all of the available images, I am not finding them.
I am looking at the column under "Que otro idioma o dialecto habla" and for one person it says, Castillan (?)It is not a term (as a Canadian), that I have found previously. Can anyone elaborate?Katrina Link
As I understand it, Castellan is the official Spanish language of Spain and Mexico.
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:05:12 +0000
> From: link_katrina@yahoo.ca
> To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] 1930 Census Question
>
> I am looking at the column under "Que otro idioma o dialecto habla" and for one person it says, Castillan (?)It is not a term (as a Canadian), that I have found previously. Can anyone elaborate?Katrina Link
Those from Mexico, Guatemala, Spain, Cuba, Costa Rica, etc.... do not
speak Spanish. They speak Castellano, Castillian
On Dec 28, 2014 7:05 PM, "Katrina Link" wrote:
> I am looking at the column under "Que otro idioma o dialecto habla" and
> for one person it says, Castillan (?)It is not a term (as a Canadian), that
> I have found previously. Can anyone elaborate?Katrina Link
I live in Mexico and I speak Spanish, that's the name of the main language spoken here (español). The RAE dictionary defines Spanish (español) as the common language in Spain and many American countries. In the USA foreigners prove their English proficiency with the TOEFL test, in France they use the DELF and DALF for French, and in Spain they use the DELE (Diploma de Español como Lengua Extranjera). It seems to me like in most countries where the language is spoken it is called español, except in Spain where for political correctness towards Spaniards who speak regional languages like gallego, vasco or catalán, they have to call it castellano (Castillian) rather than Spanish. But me and pretty much everybody I know in México, we speak Spanish (español).
Victoriano Navarro
Spain actually has several official co-languages in use in the various autonomous regions, i.e., Castellano (Castile and all Spain), Catalan (Valencia), Euskera (Basque region), Gallego (Galicia), etc.
At the time of the Conquest, Queen Isabella was Castilian and both the King and Queen spoke Castilian; in order to unite the several minor kingdoms of the Iberian peninsula with their growing empire, it was adopted as the official language of not only Spain and the Spanish court but also its territories worldwide. The Castilian dialect is what ultimately we know on this side of the pond as "español." Now, typically the terms 'español' and 'castellano' are used interchangeably.
In Spain, if you were to ask what was the name of the official language, they'd probably say it depends on where you are located.
My Mexican-born parents always referred to 'castellano' as being the proper form of the Spanish language, i.e., no slang.
Sandra Velez
Jose Reynoso
Esther, from my recollections, at the other side of the river from Guadalajarita is La Cantera. Which are only a few houses, not sure if it qualified as a village...
Jose,
Have you been able to locate any of your Reynoso's in this Census? If so, under which municipality - Juchipila or Moyahua?
I looked into La Cantera, but did not see any of the individuals I was looking for. I also looked at La Cantera Sur (just in case).
Thanks!
Esther Reynoso Valencia
facebook.com/esther.r.valencia
Esther,
I must be doing something wrong, I'm not finding anything. The only place that shows up is Apozol, Zacatecas. What link are you using?
Thanks,
Jose Reynoso Mejia
Esther,
I've found the right link and have found many of my relatives in San Jose de la Boquilla. The census was taken in May 1930, prior to the rainy season. That's when the crops were being planted just waiting for the rains to come. I know my grandfather Melesio Reynoso lived in Guadalajarita most of the year, but owned and worked the land in San Jose de la Boquilla. Thus, I found him and his whole family in San Jose de la Boquilla. By the way, that is where I was born (June), my father was working some of the land my grandfather owned in San Jose de la Boquilla.
Thanks,
Jose Reynoso Mejia
Yes, that would make sense.......Do you know the region fairly well? Do any other names come to mind?
I did find Secundino Reynoso married to Aniceta Mejia. Secundino was my grandfather's 1/2 brother. That would explain why he is here, but my grandfather and the other siblings are not.
Thank you!
Esther Reynoso Valencia
facebook.com/esther.r.valencia
Esther,
I did find your relatives and mine in "El Atravesano" in the Moyahua municipality, first image. Juan, Felix, Melecio, and Mercedes Reynoso with their spouses are listed.
Jose Reynoso Mejia
Jose,
Thank you for taking the initiative to go through each of the records. I was going to look into Pena Blanca, El Pitayo, and La Lobera. These all sounded familiar to me. If that didn't work, I was going to start going through each one (I will probably still do this once I get my computer fixed - it's running very slow).
When I shared with my father where I had found him and his family, he stated that he had never even heard of this rancho! He thought for sure that they would show up in La Boquilla since he remembers that his father and grandfather always mentioned the "sembradillos" in conversations that included your grandfather Melecio and grandmother Lucia.
Thank you so much for sharing this with me!
Esther Reynoso Valencia
facebook.com/esther.r.valencia
Here is a picture of the Spanish Monarchy and that symbol of the eye in a triangle that is the same like in the current american dollar bill:
What in the world are those two round things under the crown?
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
> To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> From: zacatecano020@hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:59:45 -0800
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
>
> Here is a picture of the Spanish Monarchy and that symbol of the eye in a triangle that is the same like in the current american dollar bill:
>
> http://oi62.tinypic.com/2vd63qp.jpg
>
> The reference no. to look it up:
>
> MP-ESTAMPAS,259
>
> http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
Hi Emile. The two "round things" under the crown are the world hemispheres, East and West. The one on the right represents Europe and the one on the left the Americas. That's the reason for the handshake between the two worlds. The Lion is the symbol of Spain, and the alligator represents the Americas, all under the watchful eye of God and the Holy Trinity (the triangle with the eye in the middle). Rgds, Bill Figueroa.
----- Original Message -----
From: Emilie Garcia
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
What in the world are those two round things under the crown?
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
> To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> From: zacatecano020@hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:59:45 -0800
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
>
> Here is a picture of the Spanish Monarchy and that symbol of the eye in a triangle that is the same like in the current american dollar bill:
>
> http://oi62.t.inypic.com/2vd63qp.jpg
>
> The reference no. to look it up:
>
> MP-ESTAMPAS,259
>
> http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
Bill,
Thank you for posting all that interesting info. We can all benefit from learning about heraldry in our ancestry. The maps are amazing, giving us an insight into how our ancestors found the New World and where they came from in the old.
Emilie
> From: bill_figueroa@usa.net
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 08:58:03 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
>
> Hi Emilie. The two "round things" under the crown are the world hemispheres, East and West. The one on the right represents Europe and the one on the left the Americas. That's the reason for the handshake between the two worlds. The Lion is the symbol of Spain, and the alligator represents the Americas, all under the watchful eye of God and the Holy Trinity (the triangle with the eye in the middle). Rgds, Bill Figueroa.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Emilie Garcia
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
>
>
> What in the world are those two round things under the crown?
>
> Emilie
> Port Orchard, WA
>
> > To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> > From: zacatecano020@hotmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:59:45 -0800
> > Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
> >
> > Here is a picture of the Spanish Monarchy and that symbol of the eye in a triangle that is the same like in the current american dollar bill:
> >
> > http://oi62.t.inypic.com/2vd63qp.jpg
> >
> > The reference no. to look it up:
> >
> > MP-ESTAMPAS,259
> >
> > http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
>
> To post, send email to:
> research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
>
> To change your subscription, log on to:
> http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
Thanks Bill for this very detailed explanation of the signs and symbols
depicted!
Much appreciated!!
Alicia
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Emilie Garcia
wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Thank you for posting all that interesting info. We can all benefit from
> learning about heraldry in our ancestry. The maps are amazing, giving us
> an insight into how our ancestors found the New World and where they came
> from in the old.
>
> Emilie
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: bill_figueroa@usa.net
> > To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 08:58:03 -0600
> > Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
> >
> > Hi Emilie. The two "round things" under the crown are the world
> hemispheres, East and West. The one on the right represents Europe and the
> one on the left the Americas. That's the reason for the handshake between
> the two worlds. The Lion is the symbol of Spain, and the alligator
> represents the Americas, all under the watchful eye of God and the Holy
> Trinity (the triangle with the eye in the middle). Rgds, Bill Figueroa.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Emilie Garcia
> > To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 6:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
> >
> >
> > What in the world are those two round things under the crown?
> >
> > Emilie
> > Port Orchard, WA
> >
> > > To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
> > > From: zacatecano020@hotmail.com
> > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:59:45 -0800
> > > Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Dibujo of Spanish Monarch
> > >
> > > Here is a picture of the Spanish Monarchy and that symbol of the eye
> in a triangle that is the same like in the current american dollar bill:
> > >
> > > http://oi62.t.inypic.com/2vd63qp.jpg
> > >
> > > The reference no. to look it up:
> > >
> > > MP-ESTAMPAS,259
> > >
> > > http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/web/guest
> > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > > Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
> > >
> > > To post, send email to:
> > > research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> > >
> > > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
> > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> > Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing List
> >
> > To post, send email to:
> > research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
> >
> > To change your subscription, log on to:
> > http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>
It is good to hear that the U.S. Congress has honored the Spanish effort in
the American Revolution.
Jose Antonio Michel I believe the city of Galveston Texas is named in honor of General Bernardo Galvez?
You are right. Bernardo de Galvez y Madrid was the 61st Viceroy of New Spain.
----- Original Message -----
From: michelja2k@hotmail.com
To: general@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 4:15:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Galvez in The American
Jose Antonio Michel I believe the city of Galveston Texas is named in honor of General Bernardo Galvez?
Alvarez/Campos Family