What Is a Hipasote ??

I am trying to figure out what a Hipasote is? I am seeing this as a place of birth for some of my ancestors in Jalisco and I can't find much information.

Comments

Comment

There's a hacienda by that name in Colotlan

Saludos,

Manny Diez Hermosillo

In reply to by jrefugioghermosillo

Comment

How can I find out more information about that hacienda ? The history or any information ? Thank you !

i did another non-guadalajara dispensas index

it's for Jerez Información matrimonial 1792-1793\

http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/21043

Comments

Comment

Katy, thank you for posting this, a great way to recheck my records for missing people
Linda in Olympia

In reply to by longsjourney

Comment

your welcome, and i added the 1866 jerez marriages info. as well

Finally backed into the 1600's.

Almost my entire mother's family comes from Tlaltenango and surrounding areas.

Comments

Comment

Hi Esperanza,
i'm looking forward to your updated information about Nicolas Llamas Leal and Magdalena Robles Merino. I descend from them thru their daughter Juana and Joseph Gonzalez. I've been unable to find any information about the latter couple, such as their marriage, ca ~1690.

Juana and Joseph's daughter Efigenia married my paternal Gonzalez ancestor (Alejo Gonzalez) in Tlaltenango 1722. In the marriage and marriage bann records, however, Alejo used "Covarrubias" as his last name for some reason.

How did you find out that Nicolas Llamas was from Guanajuato?
-Arturo

Comment

you will find many of the same surnames and families in the records of Jerez and Tepetongo too
but I don't know if you have used the Sagrada Mitra indexed on this site but it's a wonderful resource to since it gives you the names of the people in each record.
good luck in your search.
Linda Castanon-Long
Olympia, Wa.

Petronila de Moctezuma

A question for Rick Ricci ...

Comments

Comment

Buenas Noches
le envio un cordial saludo a usted y a todos los miembros de este foro
una pregunta compañeros

alguien a tenido noticias sobre la publicación del libro de don Guillermo tovar de teresa donde menciona los documento en donde habla del linaje de Petronila de Moctezuma asi como su relación con el emperador Moctezuma ll?

yo soy descendiente de martin gabay navarro y de Petronila de Moctezuma y de esta pareja de su hija ana francisca gabay y lope ruiz de esparza por varias líneas de los hijos de esta ultima pareja.

espero y podremos encontrar el eslabón que nos faltan a muchos de nosotros para relacionar a Petronila de Moctezuma con el emperador Moctezuma ll
por su atención muchas gracias a todos
que tengan un excelente noche saludos
estamos en contacto.

Comment

Dear George,

The Vallalpando (Flores Villalpando) branch from Valle de Guadalupe/ Tepatitlan / Ayo el Chico / Arandas leads to ciudad Manuel Doblado, Guanajuato. From there I believe it leads to Tomas son married to a Flores that you posted . I don't recall whether you had them marrying in Aguascalientes or Guanajuato.

The other branch from Valle de Guadalupe / jalostotitlan/ Teocaltiche /Zacatecas was the one you helped me connect to Aguascalientes.

Since both branches left descendants in Valle de Guadalupe where two couples of the same names (Casillas-Villalpando are married in the same year there has been great confusion as which of these two couples are the parents of Francisco Casillas Villalpando. It was only through a document from Claudias dispenses, and real estate records of inheritance that the issue was finally resolved.

I am bringing this same confusion to the "established Romo de Vivar lineage". People that want to stay with the established lines will just ignore this evidence. But I am only seeking to clarify and make sense of the new information that we been provided with. Acknowledging the information in the inquisition records, and Señor Teresa de Tovars claims necessitates questioning accepted truths, and changing our beliefs is a necessity if the facts warrant it.

Thanks again,
Rick A Ricci

Comment

A few months ago, a nuestroranchos member mentioned that court records show that Petronila is named in the litigation over inheritance, which confirms she is one of the "other five vaguely referenced in the Codex Chimalpahin. I have not seen those records. They spoke of more than one record.

I do not have a reference or citation to a specific document, or group of documents. I was hoping that the person that had stated this information would speak up and identify where we could find this information.

I would like to hear your opinion on Guillermo Tovar de Teresa's statements regarding the Romo de Vivar / Rangel ancestors..

You have seen only one document that names Martin Navarro and Petronila de Moctezuma. I have seen two. Besides the Bartolome Rodriguez Bajo dispensation there is the document that I saw in the west Los Angeles Mormon Library that I can no longer find.

The other documents that name Petronila but the nuestroranchos member did not mention Martin being in those records. I don't know if they are digitized and available on the web, but I agree with you, identifying them would be highly beneficial.

On the other topic of the Villalpandos, While we have not completed the connections between the Juan de Villalpando, Diego Villalpando, and Tomas Villapando, we have identified that they have connections to Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and New Mexico. I believe that we have connected enough pieces to the puzzle to show that they knew and embraced the connection between them. One My Villalpandos ancestors birth in Taos New Mexico while his children and parents were born in Jalostotitlan has sparked a curiosity that leads me to seek out the connection between all these branches. I connected this branch to Zacatecas and then you connected it to Diego Villalpando in Aguascalientes. I connected The Tepatitlan branch to the Flores Villalpando branch in Guanajuato which I believe descends from one of Tomas Villalpandos sons who marries a Flores. You have connected these Villalpandos to the Villalpandos from Aguascalientes. Juan Villalpando and Ursula Olaes have been identified as being from Leon Guanajuato but I believe that we should be able to find the connection through my ancestors in Jalostotitlan. When my ancestors visited their family in New Mexico they may have left some record of how they were related since during this visit one ancestor of mine was born there. I'm hoping his baptismal record or birth record may shed some light when we identify his padrinos. Though we do not have enough pieces to connect all of these people, they all seem to be interconnected and a pride in their Villalpando name and family members

Comment

Rick

It is very hard to have a meaningful opinion on this ancestry. There are no citations to accessible documents (note that I posted a request for a scan of Diego Romo de Vivar's baptismal record, but I have not had a response) that I have seen. Posted genealogies with their ancestry are undocumented, thus are not much value.

Without evidence to review, any opinion is simply speculation.

George Fulton

Comment

The problem is that most people, over 99 %, just repeat what genealogists have stated over the years. I myself continue to have the traditional dates and people as the parents in my family tree but I do add notes that there are a couple of points that should be addressed before stating that they are 100 per cent confirmed.
First Sr. Teresa de Tovar stated that he had a lot of proof showing a different Rangel tree. The second point is that in the records that show the officials of the inquisition there is a Diego Romo de Vivar from the same time frame as our Diego de Vivar but his parents have different names. Either our Diego Romo de Vivar was not an official of the inquisition as the genealogists have stated or there is an error in the records. If our Diego Romo de Vivar was not a member of the inquisition than Guillermo Teresa de Tovar statements regarding him being deeply involved in the silver mines, and the different Rangel ancestry makes more sense. Since Guillermo Teresa de Tovar is not here to defend his statements we are left to wonder where he found his information.

If the statement that our Diego Romo de Vivar ancestor was an official of the inquisition is true, then we need to change who we have as his parents. I personally read the inquisition records, they definitely name different parents.

Rick A. Ricci

Comment

Mr. Ricci,

Couldn't our Diego Romo de Vivar have also been working for the Inquisition
and been a miner too. why do they have to be different people. where does
it say that the other Diego Romo de Vivar has different parents? is there a
source that we can see.

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Dear Danny,

Yes, our Diego Romo de Vivar could have been both a member off the inquisition and worked extensively in the mines. But if he was in the inquisition, then he should have been in the book that recorded all the officials of the inquisition in Mexico. If he was an official of the inquisition, and he was the one listed in the records, then he has different parents than the ones that everyone claims. If he was not an official of the inquisition, and he was the Diego Romo de Vivar that worked in the mines then he had a wife that was surnamed Rangel but had different parents then the ones listed. There are two Diego Romo de Vivars with two spouses with the Rangel surname apparently. Since the wives have different parents and the husbands have different parents we must identify them as two separate couples. Then we must identify the correct couple that is the ancestor to our Romo de Vivar line. It seems that either everyone has the wrong husband or the wrong wife listed as an ancestor.

If there is something wrong with this logic I would hope that someone would clarify the situation for me. Except for George, I don't see anyone else questioning what everyone takes for granted.

PS. I have looked over the inquisition records over and over again. There is only one Diego Romo de Vivar listed as an official of the inquisition and he is not the one that everyone identifies as our ancestor.

Some clarification should be provided when Sr.Teresa de Tovars book is published. We could then look at his information on the miner diego romo de Vivar and see if correlates with the data we have confirmed. He was positive that the diego romo de Vivar that we claim as an ancestor was married to a different woman/Rangel then the one that is claimed. Actually the claim is different parents for her. If we find evidence that we descend from the other Rangel woman then that means we descend from the Diego Romo de Vivar that was an inquisitor and not the miner.

Even though the Romo de Vivar is of great interest to my family, I Can not spend a lot of time researching this at this moment because I have some other goodies already on the fire where I do have answers to questions that have befuddled genealogists for generations. Much of my present research is directed to areas that pertain to the book I am presently writing. As it is, because of work commitments, I will most probably do little genealogical research in the next few months. Then it will most likely involve research for last second additions to the book. My Romo de Vivar research will most likely have to wait to mid 2016.

Thanks,
Rick A. Ricci

Comment

Dear George,

In my book on my Romo de Vivar family I do provide a citation to the record naming a Diego Romo de Vivar as an official to the inquisition. I would like to clarify Señor Teresa de Tovars claims before I publish this book since I need clarification on the Rangel branch of the family. Also research into Señor Teresa' de Tovars claims will be needed to support my claims since everyone takes the information that is out there for granted. His research should confirm my claims that the two Diego Romo de Vivars are being confused with one another and once this acknowledgement is made than we can look to separate the two individuals and indent iffy the correct one. Sr. Teresa de Tovar himself took for granted Diego Romo de Vivar and only questioned, and identified, different parents for the wife. He never questioned if There was another Diego Romo De Vivar that was our ancestor. But his statements only renewed my confusion over the inquisition records which state different parents.

Thanks again for all your help,
Rick A Ricci

Comment

Dear George,

You asked if anyone had a copy of Diego Romo de vivar's baptismal record. Don't worry about finding that record. Many genealogists have traveled to Toledo to look up this record. They have found a record of a Diego Romo de Vivar with the parents that everyone has. The question is not who his parents are. The question should be "which Diego Romo de Vivar is our ancestor?"

If genealogists knew that our ancestor was named Diego Romo De Vivar and that he was from Rielves, proceeded to go to Rielves to search for a Diego Romo de Vivar born about 1590, and then found a record of one born in 1589 in Rielves they must have jumped for joy as they learned his parents names. The question is did they find the right Diego Romo de Vivar. I have confirmed that the other Diego Romo de Vivar was an official of the inquisition, but they may have overlooked his baptismal record as his record would show his father's name as Perez de Vivar and not Romo. His mother is the one surnamed Romo. If we insist that our ancestor is an official of the inquisition than we need to rethink who our ancestor is. Vital to this discussion is the information the Señor Teresa de tovar claimed to have identifying a wife with different parents. I can't publish until I can review Señor Teresa de Tovars and dig deeper into his claims. His information, combined with mine should identify the correct Diego Romo de Vivar along with the correct Maria Rangel.

A third point that I forgot to bring up was that there has always been confusion about Diego Romo de Vivars death date. The two dates that are used both can't be true since He can't pass away in 1640 and also be alive after 1659. This in itself is a big red flag that we are talking about two Diego Romo de Vivar s.

Since you are rightfully concerned that any information on this subject can be verified, be assured that I am in possession of the inquisition and limpieza de Sangre over many centuries. I have to be careful with the documents as they are older than me and fragile. They weren't handled much but they are very old. I very carefully turn the pages. The documents actually contain a wealth of information, often indentifying not only parents but paternal and maternal grandparents along with where even the parents and grandparents come from which is not always the same location. While looking at the records today looking for Diegos record, I found Bartolome Martin del campo and his limpieza de Sangre and three generations are listed along with where they are from. There are many names in these documents. They are too fragile to handle often. I won't make copies as I don't want to damage the sheets. The sheets are in perfect condition, just very old, and I am afraid of damaging them. I am sure other people must also have these records but I don't know anyone who does. When I had the opportunity to buy them I didn't think twice though I thought it was a little expensive when I made the purchase. I was just so shocked that they were for sale that I just bought them at the asking price.
Thanks again,
Rick A. Ricci

Comment

Mr. Ricci and others,

last night I looked for information on Diego Romo de Vivar. theres a bunch
of stuff on the internet and in posts of Nuestros Ranchos and some mention
our Diego Romo de Vivar went to Chihuahua places like Rancho Canutilo and
Santa Maria Del Rio Florida and Hidalgo De Parral, if thats true it sounds
like our Diego Romo de Vivar is the one that's the miner also do you know
when our Diego Romo de Vivar was supposed to die? I saw on Nuestros Ranchos
and other places a lot of different dates. Some say he died in 1650 in
Hacienda Canutilo and some say he died in 1649 in Santa Maria Del Rio
Florida. this geni.com tree, which I know usually has errors says he died
in Parral in 1640
http://www.geni.com/people/Diego-Romo-de-Vivar-y-P%C3%A9rez/60000000092…

do you know if our Diego Romo de Vivar was in Chihuahua and which death
date is right?

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Hi Danny,

Yes, our Diego Romo de Vivar did own property in Chihuahua and travelled extensively to the northern territories of Mexico. Also, he couldn't have died in any of those years since he was still purchasing property in 1658. And, when his wife, María Rangel died in 1659, he was also still alive:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11773-147776-25?cc=1502404…

Here is a record of the death of one of his indigenous servants named Ana in 1662 who is listed as being from Sonora. Her husband is listed as being from Sinaloa. The record is proof of Diego Romo de Vivar's travels to northern Mexico:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11773-145260-58?cc=1502404…

Below that is probably the defuncion for his daughter in law, Luisa de los Ángeles de los Reyes, who was married to his son, also named Diego Romo de Vivar.

Diego Romo de Vivar was getting fairly advanced in age when his wife died, so he probably died shortly thereafter, sometime during the 1660s.

Chris

Comment

I reread the section on Diego Romo de Vivar in Retoños de España en La Nueva Galicia 2011 by Mariano González Leal.

Here is some information found in it:

He states that the Romo, Vivar, Rincón, and Agüero are from Toledo.

In 1795 he profoundly studied records found in the Archivo Histórico Nacional de Madrid that relate to those families. Rielves has one of the best conserved records which start in 1573 and in 1574 the records the records show several Romo families enormously extended throughout the jurisdiction and there are various branches of this lineage.

In the Archivo Histórico Nacional de Madrid, ramo Inquisición, legajo 122, número 12 from 1629 there is a limpieza de sangre (proof of noble lineage) for Diego Pérez de Vivar y Romo vecino de la villa de Teguantepeque en esta Nueva España y natural de la villa de México. Padres Diego Pérez de Vivar y María Romo vecinos de Tehuantepec y naturales de Rielves en el Arzobispado de Toledo, a tres leguas de Toledo.....Pedro Romo hermano de María Romo fue Comisario del Santo Oficio en Fuensalida.

****

De estos linajes regionales. los Romos y los Vivares....hubo varios caballeros que pasaron a Indias, todos ellos parientes entre si.

Uno de los primeros emigrantes de este linaje a la Nueva España fue Diego Pérez de Vivar y Romo...

[The above person is probably the one the Ricci found a document about and is not our ancestor although likely a relative of his. There is some information about the document at the Pares site. Just search for Diego Perez de Vivar año 1629. Once you click on it you will find that it says Informaciones genealógicas de Diego Pérez de Vivar, natural de México, pretendiente a familiar del Tribunal de la Inquisición de la citada ciudad, y de su mujer Catalina Ponce de León, natural de Huehuetlán (México)]

Don Mariano said he found the baptismal record of Diego Romo de Vivar on 16 Sep 1975 which is listed as 12 Mar 1589. So he is the one that reported the baptismal date.

In the genealogical information of a Capuchin nun in Lagos de Moreno named María Isabel Josefa a witness stated that she was a descendant of a Governor of Parral. Mariano González Leal states that he was actually a Teniente de Alcalde Mayor de las minas de Yndee, en las inmediaciones del Real de Parral. There is another piece of information about his cousin Diego Romo de Arellano who was also a cousin of Pedro Rincón the (originally from Rielves and direct ancestor of the Mayorazo de Cienega de Mata) [mentioned at http://bibliotecadigital.ilce.edu.mx/sites/estados/libros/aguas/html/se…], as was Diego Romo de Vivar. He wrote in his will that he had helped Diego Romo de Vivar and he had lent him a slave that he sold to Hernando Bustillos. Mariano mentions that Hernando Bustillos was the owner of hacienda de Canutillo in the jurisdiction of Real de Parral. [For those that didn't already know, a Real is a mining town.]

Mariano mentions documents about Diego Romo de Vivar from 1620 and 1621 showing that he was in Mexico City. Then he mentions a couple of other documents showing him to be an administrator of haciendas in Ayo El Grande and Atotonilco.

On 30 June 1625 his son is baptized in San Felipe del Obispado de Michoacán. [Currently San Felipe, Guanajuato also known as San Felipe Torres Mochas]

10 Oct 1634 he was at the hacienda de el Canutillo in which he states he is Teniente de Alcalde Mayor.

Then 3 Feb 1647 as a vecino y labrador del valle de San Bartolomé, provincia de Santa Barbara y primer poblador en el río de Conchos. On another document from 6 Feb 1647 he states that he is pacificador de los indios mansos del Río del Norte.

26 Mar 1658 he buys the hacienda Rincón, today Rincón de Romos, and he left his family there and went back north after the death of his wife in 1659. He was still alive in 1666. [He doesn't mention the source for him still being alive in 1666].

Guillermo Tovar de Teresa had Diego Romo de Vivar's death as 1650 - Santa Maria del Río Florido according to his Geneanet site at http://gw.geneanet.org/monardes?lang=es;p=diego;n=romo+de+vivar so he had a mistake there also.

Does anyone have a copy of the Jaime Holcombe Isunza sheet on Diego Romo de Vivar that they are willing to share? In his Letters, Jaime also states "María died on 19 June 1659. Shortly after, Diego returned to Parral." so I wonder why Guillermo Tovar de Teresa thought that Diego Romo de Vivar died in 1650. You can read the letters at https://www.dropbox.com/s/6invajbk0zzo4jm/Letters%20Edited%20for%20Dist…

Comment

Dear Armando,
I have many questions on both Diego Romo de Vivar and Maria Rangel.
Where is the evidence that our Diego Romo de Vivar is the one that is baptized in 1589?
Why the different ancestries on Maria Rangel?
Why the different dates of death?
If he is an official of the inquisition where is limpieza de Sangre?
How is it that our Diego romo de Vivar is found all over Mexico from Northern Mexico, to Aguacalientes, and to Mexico City without mention of the other Diego Romo de Vivars?
A couple of years ago a professional genealogist in Spain stated that our Diego romo de Vivar descended from a Diego Romo de Vivar married to a Catalina Ponce de Leon. This genealogist even provided their parents. I tossed this information aside but now that you bring it up I believe it is now relevant to our discussion. Now that you connect Catalina Ponce de Leon to our Mexican Inquisitor Diego Romo de Vivar (Diego Perez de Vivar Romo) there is even more reason to dig deeper into these questions.

Señor Guillermo tovar de Teresa was insistent that he had strong evidence that The Diego Romo de Vivar born in 1589 was born to a Maria Rangel with different parents. We need to look at all the evidence and decide who is the correct diego romo de Vivar and who is the correct Maria Rangel.

If you insist that our Diego Romo de Vivar is a pacificador de Indios, then where is his limpieza de Sangre? Right now, with the documents in hand, the only Diego Romo de Vivar that is an official of the inquisition is the one that was at one time married to Catalina Ponce and is also known as Diego Perez de Vivar. It seems more likely that our Diego Romo de Vivar was married twice, first to Catalina Ponce and later to a Maria Rangel in mexico with her parents still in dispute. The work by the professional genealogist that I had discarded needs to be found and searched for clues .

Tovar de Teresa's work on the Rangel family and the work of the genealogist from Spain is extremely important to this discussion.
Or you could just leave things alone and accept Mariano Gonzalez leals word.

Is this the same Armando that wouldn't accept me telling him that I held in my hand the document that connected our Petronila To Moctezuma? Won't accept that I saw it with my own eyes? Yet accepts Diego Romo de Vivars parentage despite all of these issues? Your response actually reinforces The inquisitors case because now you have brought Catalina Ponce de Leon and the other genealogists work into the discussion.

I hope I haven't offended anyone with my comments,
Thanks,
Rick A Ricci

Comment

oops I posted this with no subject so I have to bring it over here.

Armando,

I have sort of the same question of Mr. Ricci, but I noticed on several
peoples different trees they have Diego Perez De Vivar and Catalina Ponce
De Leon as the Grandparents of our Capitan Diego Romo De Vivar like these
peoples

http://gw.geneanet.org/turandot1?lang=en;pz=luis;nz=nunez+gornes;ocz=0;…

http://www.paginasprodigy.com.mx/glezgo/familiago/pafg61.htm#203

Could the people thats mentioned in pares as a person from the inquisicion
be the grandparents of our Capitan Diego Romo De Vivar?

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

No, he is not the grandfather, he is a contemporary of the time frame we have for our ancestor. He is in Mexico. Unless someone can show evidence to the contrary, he is the pacificador de los Indios. He is the Diego Romo de Vivar with a limpieza de Sangre. Placing him as the grandfather is a way of not disrupting the lines that everyone follows.

And yes he could have been involved in the mines, but he is the only one that is an inquisitor, and our ancestor is identified as an inquisitor. The identification of our Diego Romo de Vivar as an inquisitor has to be a mistake if we keep saying that he is the Diego Romo de Vivar born in 1589 in Rielves.

I don't mind if someone proves this wrong, let's see the evidence.

Rick A. Ricci

Comment

Mr. Ricci,

I looked at the information Armando posted and it seems to be proof that
your person and our Diego Romo De Vivar are different people. it doesn't
seem there's really any evidence to suggest he is the same person. the
stuff on the internet and google books show lots of information on our
Diego Romo De Vivar and most of them show him buying property in
Aguascalientes and Chihuahua and pacifying Indians and being at the Mines
in Durango but nothing about the inquisition. Plus your person doesn't seem
to be called Diego Romo de Vivar, he seems to be called Diego Perez de
Vivar according to Pares and this site

http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/ead-display/-/ead/pl/aicode/ES-2807…

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Dear Rick,

No one has his death record for our Diego Romo de Vivar nor have they reported to have seen it. We only know when he was alive. On 26 Mar 1658 he purchased la hacienda El Rincón so he was definitely alive then. The death record of his wife María Rangel 19 June 1659 does not say she was a viuda so the assumption is that he was still alive then also. The record that Christopher shared with us showed that he had Chichimeca servants from Sonora and Sinaloa in 24 Nov 1662. We still need the record from 1666 that don Mariano González Leal implied existed to determine that he was alive at that time also.

Since our Diego Romo de Vivar was still married to María Rangel in 1659 and their first son Joseph was baptized 30 June 1625 in San Felipe, Gto then we know that they were married the entire time from 1625 to 1659. Therefore, he could not be the Diego Pérez de Vivar that submitted his genealogical information in 1629 since Diego Pérez de Vivar was married to Catalina Ponce de León and Diego Romo de Vivar was married to María Rangel in that same year.

The testament of his son Pedro Romo de Vivar states yo, el Capitán Pedro Romo de Vivar vecino de esta Villa de Aguascalientes y natural del Real y minas de San Joseph del Parral en el Reino de la Vizcaya, hijo legítimo del Capitán Diego Romo de Vivar y de María Rangel, vecinos que fueron del dicho Real ya difuntos…. soy casado y velado según orden de nuestra santa madre Iglesia católica romana con Lorenza Ruiz de Esparza. http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/15484 So with that we have a document of a son of our Diego Romo de Vivar and our Miaría Rangel stating that he was born in Real y minas de San Joseph del Parral en el Reino de la Vizcaya which is now in Chihuahua but was living in Aguascalientes and married and died in Aguascalientes.

Through various dispensas we know that Pedro was the brother of Diego, Gerónimo, and Isabel. From at least one other dispensa we know that Isabel was the sister of María Rangel Romo de Vivar the wife of Miguel de Cobos https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-16200-82?cc=1874591&wc…. From the following dispensa https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18411-18560-93?cc=1874591&wc… we know that Francisco Romo and Juan Romo were brothers and both were sons of Diego Romo and María Rangel. From the dispensa at https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-37591-7?cc=1874591&wc=… we know that Francisco and Gerónimo Romo were brothers. Some descendants of Francisco Romo used the Rangel surname and there is never a descendant of our Diego Romo that uses the Ponce de León surname.

I have yet to see well documented ancestries on Maria Rangel so I have no idea why anyone has an ancestry on her.

There aren’t documents showing that our Diego Romo de Vivar was an official of the Inquisition. That was Diego Pérez de Vivar.

I have no idea why there is no other mention of Diego Pérez de Vivar in México. Maybe he never became an official. Maybe he died shortly after becoming an offical. Maybe the documents have been lost or just not identified yet. There are too many possible reasons.

I never connected Catalina Ponce de León to our Diego Romo de Vivar. He is connected to Diego Pérez de Vivar.

There is no proof that our Diego Romo de Vivar is the one that is baptized in 1589 so if you want to toss that baptismal date and location that is fine. However, he is not the same person as Diego Pérez de Vivar.

I don’t know of any evidence that our Diego Romo de Vivar was born to a María Rangel. We only have evidence that he was married to María Rangel.

There are plenty of people that held posts such as that of our Diego Romo de Vivar that we don’t have a limpieza de sangre for. It shouldn’t be surprising that his hasn’t been found.

Guillermo Tovar de Teresa's work would be valuable if we had access to it. He has made several mistakes just like all other genealogists have. One of them was not understanding the genealogy of Juan González de Hermosillo even after Sergio Gutiérrez pointed it out to him.

No doubt that the genealogist from Spain hadn’t seen all of the documents on Diego Romo de Vivar and his descendants. Otherwise he would not have confused Diego Romo de Vivar and Diego Pérez de Vivar.

I have never met you so I am not the Armando you had a discussion with about a document that you held in your hand. I have never argued against Petronila being a descendant of Moctezuma. You are either confusing me with someone or confusing what was said in discussions on this site. Please don’t do that.

Why are you accepting that Diego Romo de Vivar and Diego Pérez de Vivar is the same person despite all of the evidence against it? Diego Romo de Vivar could not have been married with María Rangel between 1625 and 1659 and have been married with Catalina Ponce de León in 1629.

Comment

Dear Armando,

I agree that Diego Romo de Vivar and Diego Perez de Vivar are not likely the same person if Diego Perez de Vivar is already married to Catalina Ponce. I did not realize that this Diego Perez de Vivar is the same one married to Catalina Ponce, my recollection was that she was from earlier in the 1500s and was married to a Diego Perez de Vivar with different parents. My records don't show him as being married to her.

What I am not sold on is that our Diego Romo de Vivar is the same one as the one born in 1589. The third Diego Romo de Vivar that George Fulton brought up as arriving in Mexico also fits the time frame and arrives with family. I am looking for the evidence that shows that our Diego Romo de Vivar is the one born in 1589, came over to Mexico and was an official of the inquisition. I have not found thAt evidence and wonder why. The claim that he was an official of the inquisition did require a limpieza de Sangre if they followed their rules so your statement that he didn't need one is new to me. I guess they didn't always follow their rules.

I also feel that we shouldn't disregard Guillermo Tovar de Teresa's claims. If he is correct than I still believe that all these things that we claim to be done by one person was actually done by two people with the same name with possibly wives with also the same name.
Rick A Ricci

Comment

Dear Rick,

You continually post about your records but you rarely cite sources, dates, or what information is contained in them. It looks like your information is the same that some other people have that is without primary sources and has the wrong genealogy. Any genealogy that has Catalina Ponce as an ancestor has the wrong genealogy because the only document that mentions her as being part of a Romo family is the one that is for Diego Pérez de Vivar.

George Fulton did not bring up a third Diego Romo de Vivar as arriving in Mexico. That Diego Romo doesn’t use the surname Vivar and he went to Peru. Diego Pérez de Vivar was the one that submitted his genealogy to be an inquisitor. There is only one Diego Romo de Vivar which is the one we descend from. You are confusing very simple facts.

You are the only one that is claiming that our Diego Romo de Vivar was an official of the inquisition. Mariano González de Leal never did and Jaime Holcombe Isunza never did. That’s because it was Diego Pérez de Vivar and not Diego Romo de Vivar.

We don't even know which two people named Diego Romo de Vivar it was that Guillermo Tovar de Teresa claims were being confused. If they were Diego Romo de Vivar and Diego Pérez de Vivar then we have already established that they are two different people and there is no longer a reason to mention Guillermo Tovar de Teresa's claim.

Comment

When I looked for Diego Romo de Vivar in PARES some time ago, I did not find anything; so I then looked for Romo. A number of records come up, and I went through the whole list.

There are a few Romo's from Rielves, and I asked, through a posting at NR, if anyone knew if there was a connection between these Romo families and our Romo de Vivar. None of these records were digitized. Daniel offered an opinion that there may be or could be a relationship, but it was only an opinion.

Can anyone cite a primary reference that connects Diego Romo de Vivar in Mexico to Rielves in Castille?

I know that sometimes compound names are not always used in full - I've seen this with the Macias Valades and Ruis de Esparsa. Thus these Romo's may be Romo de Vivar, but that is only speculation at this point.

The Rielves church records are not listed in the Family History Library catalog; it seems that few Spanish church records are available at Family Search. Thus, we must rely on secondary sources.

I would like to see what is in Mariano Gonzalez Leal's latest work on the Romo de Vivar family, but I have yet to see a copy.

George Fulton

Comment

Danny,

Instead of using the site http://www.archivesportaleurope.net for records from Spain it is best to use the site http://pares.mcu.es/ParesBusquedas/servlets/Control_servlet?accion=100 where you can see more information directly from the Spanish portal.

Put the following in:

Buscar: Diego Pérez de Vivar
Fecha desde: 1629
Signatura: INQUISICIÓN,1222,Exp.12

Then click on Buscar at the bottom. Then click Consejo de Inquisición then click Informaciones genealógicas de Diego Pérez de Vivar y de Catalina Ponce de León, su mujer

In this case the only extra information is Informaciones genealógicas de Diego Pérez de Vivar, natural de México, pretendiente a familiar del Tribunal de la Inquisición de la citada ciudad, y de su mujer Catalina Ponce de León, natural de Huehuetlán (México) but other times the extra information will be more and at times you can see digital copies of documents.

In reply to by Armando

Comment

Armando,

Thank you so much. I will only use the Pares site instead, and thank you for explaining all of the information. This clears up a lot. you explained everything that I was confused about and proved once and for all that the two Diego's couldnt be the same people.

Danny C. Alonso

In reply to by Armando

Comment

Armando, I don't think i'm doing the Pares right. I entered the information and clicked the buttons you said but mine doesn't show me the grandparents of Catalina Ponce De Leon like yours does.

Danny C. Alonso

In reply to by dcalonso

Comment

Danny,

The Pares sites doesn't have the parents and grandparents of Catalina Ponce de León. Mariano González Leal had transcribed the information into his book Retoños de España en La Nueva Galicia. He has a copy of the original document.

In reply to by Armando

Comment

Armando,

Thank you. I thought I was missing something. Did he travel to spain to get those records or are they available somewhere here

Danny C. Alonso

In reply to by dcalonso

Comment

Danny,

Mariano González Leal traveled to Spain in 1975 to view the records at the Archivo Histórico Nacional de Madrid. I had also mentioned that in the post titled Diego Romo de Vivar in Retoños de España.

Comment

Danny,

The reason those people have Diego Pérez de Vivar and Catalina Ponce de León Fernández de Castañeda as the grandparents of our Capitán Diego Romo de Vivar is because they copied a genealogy that someone confused the limpieza de sangre of 1629 for Diego Pérez de Vivar as being for the grandfather of our Diego Romo de Vivar which is exactly what Rick Ricci seems to be doing. Notice that they don't cite sources for their work either.

Our Diego Romo de Vivar stated on 30 Oct 1620 that he was 33 years old. We know that in those days people couldn't remember their exact age so it shouldn't be taken literally but as a guide to the age within a few years. This would make Diego Pérez de Vivar too young to be the grandfather of our Diego Romo de Vivar since a grandfather of a person that was 42 years old in 1629 would be too old to be an inquisitor or not even alive in most cases.

The limpieza de sangre from 1629 has Diego Pérez de Vivar as being married to Catalina Ponce de León and it has her genealogical information also. It says that she was daughter of Juan Ponce de León and Clara de Castañeda and it provide the towns in Mexico they were born in. Her paternal grandparents were Diego de Ordaz Ponce de León from Mexico and Beatriz Ramírez de Acevedo from the Reino de León (I assume Spain). Her maternal grandparents were Alonso Fernández de Castañeda from the Arzobispado de Burgos (definitely Spain) and María de Quiroz from Merida.

It was from this family that they got Catalina Ponce de León Fernández de Castañeda as being the grandmother of our Diego Romo de Vivar but the dates totally refute that possibility.

You should try to get a hold of a copy of this section of the book Retoños de España en la Nueva Galicia edition 2011 by Mariano González Leal so you can read all of the information that is in the book.

Comment

The baptismal record for Joseph Romo de Vivar, in San Felipe (GTO), 30 Jun 1625, is at this address: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1951-20567-22048-90?cc=1860831…

The record is difficult to read, and it is in the volume Family Search labeled as "Bautismos de castas 1600-1672," at image 120, in the church of San Felipe Apostol, San Felipe, Guanajuato. I believe the record reads as follows:

In the margin: Joseph - Espanol

"en veinta del mes de Junio de mil seis cientos y veinte y sinco bautise a Joseph hijo de diego romo de vibar y maria Rengel vecinos de s miguel fue [or fue su?] pedrino pedro Garcia de [illegible]"

There are two other baptisms as part of the same record (the signature follows the third baptism).

The second baptism is "Franco hijo de Franco [surname illegible] y de Juene" in which Diego Romo de Vivar is named as the padrino. The third baptism, Ysabel, seems to have the same parents as Franco (Francisco?), and is perhaps a twin. I cannot read the name of the madrina (I am pretty sure she is not Maria Rangel). Perhaps someone can read it better than I.

George Fulton

Comment

For the baptism of Joseph Romo de Vivar after San Miguel it should be gr for Grande but for some reason the tail is inverted. San Miguel Allende was called San Miguel El Grande prior to the independence of Mexico.

On the line after San Miguel gr it does say "fue su pedrino Pedro Garcia de" and it looks like Herrera after that.

For the third baptism this is what I think it says:

"el mesmo dia mes y año bauticé a Ysabel hija de
Francisco otomí y Juana, fue su madrina
Mencia naturales de el Miguel Grande"

Since pedrino should be padrino and madrine should be madrina then we can tell the priest uses the letter e where a should be or writes e likes a at times. So Juene is actually Juana.

Comment

Armando

Thank you for help with reading this record.

Since I did the above post, I noted that this film has been extracted, but the folks that did it had trouble with the handwriting as well. "Romo de Vibar" is extracted as "Romo de Ibar" and they also missed Francisco's surname.

George Fulton

Comment

George,

You're welcome. In their defense it does not say "Vibar" it does look more like "Ibar" and if they weren't familiar with this family they had no way to understand what the priest meant to write. He had horrible handwriting and sometimes skipped letters such as one letter for Vibar and San for San Miguel. The other priest has legible handwriting, dots the i, the a and e are easily distinguishable, and he doesn't use mesmo for mismo.

Mesmo was a more ancient way of saying mismo which comes from medipsĭmus from vulgar latin. It's still used in some rural places of Mexico.

Comment

Dear George,

In a previous post you identified another Diego Romo de Vivar in addition to the one we all identify as the progenitor of the Romo de Vivars. You wrote.:

"Diego Romo, natural de Rielves (en la información pone Illán de Vacas), soltero, hijo de Juan Romo y Ana Diaz (de Aguero), al Perú como criado del licenciado Luis Romo. Información y licencia en CONTRATACION, 5234B, N.1, R.30. The reocrd is also dated Dec. 17, 1591."
In http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/17268?page=1

When you add the Diego Romo de Vivar that I found as an official of the inquisition then we have three men named "Diego Romo de Vivar" who are contemporaries.

Diego Romo de Vivar, official de the inquisition in what is now known as Mexico, born in the late 1500's contemporary of the Diego Romo de Vivar born in Rielves (just outside Toledo) in 1589

This Diego Romo de Vivar ( aka Diego Perez de Vivar (III)
Son of. Diego Perez de Vivar (II) and Maria Romo

Diego Perez de Vivar (II) of Diego Perez de Vivar (I) born in Fuensalida ( close to Rielves, just outside Toledo) and Maria Diaz

Maria Romo is the daughter of Pedro Romo born in Rielves and Maria Diaz

Any death records from 1921 - 1934 for jalpa zacatecas

Any death records from 1921 - 1934 for jalpa zacatecas where to find how to get thanks

Comments

Comment

Are you familiar with Familysearch.org with has many on-line digital images of baptism, marriage, and death records? If yes, under the Catholic Church records there are baptisms, marriages, and deaths all lumped together for the years 1921-1951. You may also want to double check the other listings for death records in case there is an entry error. I personally have found death records under marriages in other Jalisco records. Good luck.

FW: The Byzantines Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup E1b1b1b)

Contact Angel directly if you want the attachment:

From: Angel R.

Comments

Comment

From: Angel R. Cervantes [mailto:angelrcervantes@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 6:54 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: The Byzantines Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup E1b1b1b)

Hello,

I would like to invite you to attend a lecture on the Byzantines Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup E1b1b1b). If you would like to learn more about the mark this ancient civilization made on the Iberian Peninsula then this presentation is for you. There will be a talk on the subject on October 16 at 3:30 PM, through the University of New Mexico Osher program. The class number is 19467.

To register for this Osher class go to the following link:

https://newmexico.augusoft.net/index.cfm?method=ClassInfo.ClassInformat… &int_class_id=73547&utm_source=CE-Osher

or

* Call: 505-277-0077, press option 1
* In person: M-F, 8:00am - 5:00pm,
1634 University Blvd. NE
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Best Regards,

Ángel de Cervantes
Executive Director
New Mexico DNA Project
Iberian Peninsula DNA Institute

New Member Introduction and request for assistance on Gonzalez de Hermosillo

First of all, I want to thank all of you for all of the amazing work you've
done: when I began this project at the beginning of the summer, I saved my
maternal grandfather's ancestry for last, becau

Comments

Comment

Carlos,

So everyone can follow what you are talking about. It is the CONFIRMACION DE OFICIO: FRANCISCO HERMOSILLO MEXICO,177,N.58 1607-5-30 in Audencia de México under Archivo General de Indias found at http://pares.mcu.es/

I do see where at the top of image 5 where it states he is "Francisco Hermosillo vecino de esta ciudad ...hijo legitimo de Juan González Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez su legitimo mujer mis padres difuntos y nieto de Gonzalo García Hermosillo y Leonor Sánchez Parra su mujer mis abuelos paternos; de Gonzalo Magdaleno y María Hernández su mujer mis abuelos maternos"

Then on the 8th line from the bottom it talks about his brother Juan and it says "Juan González Hermosillo vecino de esta ciudad de México hijo legitimo de Juan González Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez su mujer vecinos de esta ciudad de México...padre natural de la villa de Guadalcanal en el reino de Castilla y la dicha mi madre de esta dicha ciudad"

On image 6 I see where you it mentions what looks like the bother in law.

Image 7 is extremely interesting. At the top it says "notorio y publico de fama Juan González Hermosillo----------------------------------
en la villa de Guadalcanal a diez de este mes de febrero de mil quinientos y ochenta y
cuarto años"

I had been trying to read the documents since your first post today.

This is a great find Carlos. Congratulations on your find. It would be best to keep posts to a minumum and summarize the findings once you are done.

Armando

Comment

GREAT FIND CARLOS!!

I'd like to add, as far as I know, the "Guadalcanal" pedigree is based on one document, which would be the aforementioned Ordenes of a great-grandson of Juan GdeH and Maria Munoz: limpiezas de sangre are NOT infallible. I recently debunked a 1651 prueba de nobleza for Geronimo Magdaleno Salceda, when this one joined the Orden de Santiago; his limpieza gives a pedigree for the Magdaleno's of Valladolid/Morelia, that totally contradicts every other document I've found at PARES and FamilySearch. After further research, I discovered that there was an industry for forged pedigrees, due to the fact that many had conversos in their immediate lines. The downside to this is, since 1651, many historians and genealogists have since used that document to establish the pedigree of the Magdaleno's of Valladolid.

That said: we need to find more documentation to support the Guadalcanal pedigree! GREAT WORK, CARLOS!

Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Thanks for checking on the Ramirez, Armando, and thanks again for the clarification. Must remove all doubts!

Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

I want to share what I was able to "read" from the mentioned "Confirmación de Oficio"

It starts on apr-20th-1606 and is made by request of Francisco González de Hermosillo who declares that he´s been "escriviente" for over 10 years. The first lines were the most difficult for me to read and I read only small pieces like :

"...... de diez años a esta parte....ha servido el oficio de escribiente..." ....."y que al presente soy de edad de veintiocho años y tengo de hacienda más de 1,500 pesos de oro común...."

Then Francisco refers to another informacion made by his brother Juan González de Hermosillo 9 years earlier:

"En la Cd. de México en la Nva España 16 días de Enero de 1597.......Pérez de Vivero corregidor de esta Cd. por su magestad y en presencia de mí Juan Pérez de Rivera, notario público de número de la dicha Cd. por su magestad. Juan González de Hermosillo El Mozo, expresó el pedimento de la información original de que se hace mención. Juan González de Hermosillo vecino de esta ciudad de Mexico hijo legitimo de Juan González de Hermosillo y de Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno vecinos de esta Cd de Mexico, el dicho mi padre natural de la villa de Guadalcanal en los reinos de Castilla y la dicha mi madre de esta dicha Cd. de Mexico, digo que a miderecho conviene averiguar lo contenido.....de mi derecho y de mis hermanos y hermanas, hijos e hijas de los dichos mis padres, a vuestra merced pido y suplico se me reciba la información............"

".........ad perpetuam presentó en la dicha villa de Guadalcanal a pedimento del dicho mi padre sobre la limpieza de su persona y linaje.....la dicha información se me dé traslado autorizado"

"...........Primera: Si conocen al dicho JG de H y a Ana RM, mis padres V de esta Cd de Mexico y a Francisco Hermosillo y a Fray Gonzalo de Hermosillo de la órden de San Agustín y a Doña Catalina de Hermosillo mujer legítima de Diego Rodríguez de León vecinos de esta dicha ciudad y a doña María de Hermosillo mujer de Luis de León, notario público y de número de ella, y si conocieron a Leonor de la Parra difunta, mujer que fue de Jua Rodríguez de León vecino de esta ciudad de Mexico y a Gonzalo Magdaleno y María Hernández su mujer, difuntos, vecinos que fueron de esta ciudad, naturales de la villa de Guadalcanal, padre y madre de la dicha Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno mi madre..."

"Iten, si saben que los dichos JGdeH y ARM vecinos de esta cd de mexico son marido y mujer......procrearon a mí el dicho Juan G de H que hago este pedimento y a los dichos Francisco Hermosillo, doña Catalina, doña María, mujeres legítimas de los dichos ......y Leonor de la Parra, difunta, mujer que fue de Juan Rodríguez de León.....que si lo saben"

"Iten, si saben que el dicho Juan G de H El Viejo, padre de mó Juan G de H y mis hermanos, recebió ....de la prov..ad perpetuam pressentó en la dicha villa de Guadalcanal por poder el dicho Juan G de H envió para el dicho efecto ...que es de esta cd de mexico la cual información se muestre a los dichos ..y saben así mismo si el dicho mi padre hizo.....información y los dichos digan si conocen a los dichos de ella de escrivanos e que tienen de ella autoridad, digan si lo saben..."

"Iten, si saben que yo el dicho Juan G de H y los dichos mis hermanos, padres y abuelos, asó de padre como de madre contenidos en la primera pregunta y en la dicha información somos y fueron cristianos viejos, gente honrada límpia de toda raza morisca....ni judíos o nuevamente convertidos a nuestra santa fé católica ni ninguno de ellos ni nosotros hemos sido ni fueron penitenciados por el santo oficio de la inquisición pública ni secretamente y siempre somos y fueron habidos y tenidos como reputados assí en la dicha villa de Guadalcanal como en esta Cd de México por tales Cristianos Viejos..."

Comment

In image 7/46 I read the following:

"En la villa de Guadalcanal a diez día del mes de febrero de 1584 ante el regidor Gonzalo Xuárez de Ortega alcalde ordinario se presentó Francisco Ramírez vecino de esta villa en nombre de Juan G de H por el poder que sigue:

Sepan cuantos esta carta .....yo Juan G de H natural de la villa de Guadalcanal en los reinos de Castilla y vecino de esta cd de MMexico otorgo todo mi poder ......a Fco de Silva(¿?)(Oliva¿?) y a Fco Ramírez mi primo vecinos de la dicha villa.......escrito en la Cd de Mexico a 20 días del mes de Octubre de 1583 años..."

"........Felipe .....notario público de número de esta cd por su magestad dieron fe conocer al otorgante........Diego Rodríguez de León, notario público......los escribanos que aquí firmamos testificamos y damos fe"

"Francisco Ramírez vecino de esta villa de Guadalcanal en nombre de Juan H de H vecino de la cd de Mexico por virtude del poder que tengo del que hago presentación digo....me conviene averiguar y probar que se me reconoce como cristiano viejo que no desciende ni de moros ni de judios ni reconciliados...."

Image 8/46 has the following:

".........si conocen a Juan G de H y si conocieron a Gonzalo García de Hermosillo y a Leonor Sánchez parra, su mujer, padres del dicho Juan y si saben que el dicho Gonzalo G H y la dicha Leonor SP fueron marido y mujer legitimamente casados y procrearon al dicho ....que es natural de esta y residente en la cd de mexico..."

Image 9/46 has :

"En la villa de Guadalcanal a 10 de febrero de 1584 .........presentó a Juan de Almonte.....conoce a Juan G de H y conoció a Gonzalo García de Hermosillo y a Leonor SP de vista, trato y conversación.......que es de más de 60 años y que no es pariente de ellos..."

10/46:

"....por testigo a Pedro Yáñez El Viejo.......que es de más de 65 años..."

11/46:

"...11-feb-1584....a Juan Sáenz, médico de esta villa.....de más de 66 años y que no es pariente de ninguno...."

14/46:

".....13-feb-1584 ....a Juan de Ortega Zorro ......vecino de más de 75 años...."

15/46:

".....Alonso Yáñez ....65 años.."

16/46 :

"......Sáncho de Elvitado......de más de 60 años....."

17/46:

"....14-feb-1584....a Fraspán ? MM Galavies ? de 58 años....."

18/46:

".....16-feb-1584..... Francisco González Fox.....60 años ....no es pariente...."

20/46:

"...prova....ad perpetuam de Juan G de H El Mozo 17 de Enero de 1597.......a Alonso .......natural de la villa de Guadalcanal...que estuvo casado con una sobrina hija de su hermano que es de edad de 45 años e que como tiene dicho fue casado con prima hermana de Juan González de Hermosillo El Mozo pero que se presenta para decir verdad..........que Juan G de H y Ana R M hacen vida maridable en una casa.........al susodicho Francisco Ramírez , a Francisco de Silva? Oliva?, cuñado de Juan G de H El Viejo para hacer la dicha información para Fray Gonzalo de Hermosillo su hijo se ordenase y predicase......y se hizo la dicha información..."

"....a Cristóbal de Salvatierra natural que dijo ser de la villa de Gudadlcanalde más de 50 años de edad...."

23/46:

".....a Juan Gobea residente en esta y natural de la villa de Guadalcanal de 60 años más o menos...."

24/46:

"....al inicio ....Francisco di Frecoliva (¿?) .....que el uno es primo y el otro cuñado..........Francisco López , natural de Guadalcanal de 32 años...."

24/46:

"......a G. Sánchez Caballero natural de la villa de Guadalcanal .....de 32 años de edad...."

31/46:

"......López de Montalvan.......de 60 años....."

35/46:

.......en 1607 un testigo dice que conoció a Juan y a ana y que son difuntos.

Comment

What I understand of the mentioned document is that it is an "Información" that refers to other two previous "informaciones", and "gestiones"

Francisco González in 1606 declares to be 28 years of age and refers to another información made by his brother Juan in 1597.

In the información of 1597 is inmediately referred the previous información of 1584 that the father of Francisco and Juan El Mozo, called there Juan G de H El Viejo.

This Juan El Viejo gave Poder in 1583 to his cousin Francisco Ramírez and his brother in law
Francisco de Silva ? vecinos de Guadalcanal to request the "Información de Limpieza..."

We see that a good number of witnesses is required in that informacion made in Guadalcanal in 1584.

Later in the document we see the witnesses presented in 1597 in Mexico City that were "naturales" of Guadalcanal and that for that reason are able to testify about this family.

One of the important points of the document (I think) is the fact that the three sisters of Juan G de H "El Mozo" married to apparently three brothers Rodríguez de León and that these three brothers were prominent persons in Mexico City.

Another thing that I think is written there is that some people declare that in 1597 Juan El Viejo and Ana Rodríguez were alive and together in Mexico City, so my theory is that Ana died in that year and that Juan El viejo went to Nueva Galicia and married Ana Muñóz .

But what doesn´t fit at all is the request made in 1582 of Gonzalo García Hermosillo to have his brother given permission to come to Nueva Galicia ???

I think we have a very interesting puzzle here.

Best regards

Comment

Carlos,

Your theory still doesn't fit and the theory that Sergio Gutiérrez first proposed is the one that does fit. Since Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra was in Mexico City with a wife and children from 1558 through 1597 then he was not in Guadalcanal in 1581 through 1582 with wife and children when the brother of our Juan González de Hermosillo sent for him on 12 October 1581.

The first child of Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and Ana Rodríguez de Madaleno was Leonor and she was baptized 15 June 1559 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-14029-44

These are two different families. They are probably related due to the fact that they both use the García Hermosillo and González de Hermosillo surnames and they are all originally from Guadalcanal. But Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz are two different people.

Saludos,
Armando

Comment

By Sergio Gutierrez

I ordered them on Monday and they arrived today.

Vol I Padron 1649, p29

Casa y Estancia de Diego Alonso del Pedroso, está de la cabecera 5 leguas: Diego Alonso del Pedroso español, Paula de Torres española su muger, Alonso Ramirez su hijo solt. 20, Paula, 5.

Padron 1650, p74
Casa y Estancia de Diego Alonso, que está de la cabecera 6 leguas: Diego Alonso español, Paula de Torres española su muger, Alonso Ramirez su hijo solt. 22, Paula, 7.

There are other children listed, as well, and slaves & indian criados.

Paula de Torres la madre is looking good as madrina for the 1645 wedding, and Alonso Ramirez would've been 16-17.

There are 2 Alonso Ramirez listed in the 1679 Jalostotitlan Padron, from "Historia de nuestra señora de San Juan de los Lagos," by Alberto Santoscoy, p44:

c. est.a Polonia de Torres Alonso Ramirez ++ Francisca de Torres Juan Perez

But he is likely the one on p 351 (right after the entry for Nicolas Ramirez de Hermosillo):

est.a Alonso Ramirez “ Gracia magdalena esc. “ Nicolas Perez “ Cristobal de Torres esc.” Maria Vasquez “ Angela Vasquez ‘ Catalina de Campo Verde.

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

​Hola familia,

Regarding "Alonso" being part of the surname, as opposed to the given name:

I went back and looked at my notes, to see what led me to this conclusion, and there's enough material to make a convincing case, specifically, the 29 Dec 1666 confirmations for Melchor Gonzalez de Hermosillo and his brother, Sebastian, sons of Diego Alonso & Luisa de Nava, on which they are listed as "Melchor Alonso" and "Sebastian Alonso" (right image, their sister Maria Gonzalez is also listed):

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22796-47?cc=1874591&wc…

That was in Teocaltiche, by the way. This shows us that children other than the Diego's used "Alonso." Also, the Spanish children on this page are listed with their surnames, therefore establishing "Alonso" as a possible surname for this branch (if you look in the left image, you'll see Andres Alonso, son of another Diego Alonso and Francisca Sanchez. He's probably an Hinojos, anyone?).

I went back and checked the frequency with which "Diego Alonso" is used, without "de Hermosillo" or "Pedroso":

Confirmation for Diego, hijo de Diego Alonso y de Luisa de Nava, 06 Jan 1654 Teocaltiche:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22884-42?cc=1874591&wc…

Confirmation for Tomas, hijo de Diego Alonso and Luisa de Nava, 29 Dec 1666, Teocaltiche:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22654-2?cc=1874591&wc=…

Baptisms for children of Diego Alonso and Juana de Alderete, in Teocaltiche:

Sebastian 11 Feb 1674

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-56938-81?cc=1874591&wc…

Padrinos for Gertrudis, espanola, hija de Francisco ? padrinos Diego Alonso y Juana Alderete, 28 Jul 1677 Teocaltiche
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-56897-29?cc=1874591&wc…

Rosa Maria 05 Sep 1680
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-55008-18?cc=1874591&wc…

Diego 10 Nov 1682:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-58886-68?cc=1874591&wc…

Cayetano 20 Mar 1687
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-55545-50?cc=1874591&wc…

There is also the 1650 Padron for Jalostotitlan, on which Diego Alonso del Pedroso (I) is listed as "Diego Alonso" (the image & transcription can be viewed in Sergio Gutierrez's "Jalostotitlan Padrones Parroquiales Vol I." I recommend to anyone who has lines from this parish to purchase these books).

Perhaps I'm being naive (and I say that with sincerity), but the common practice was to include the surnames of Spaniards in these documents. If "Alonso" isn't the surname, I can think of no other case, in which the omission of the paternal surname of a prominent Spanish family was so recurrent, and in multiple generations, and in 2 different parishes. To attribute it to casual error or brevity is to ignore the obvious, i.e., that in line with the notarial practices of the era, "Alonso" is the de facto surname, short for "Alonso del Pedroso" and "Alonso de Hermosillo." If no researcher has suggested this, then this branch obviously hasn't been thoroughly researched, and one can only presume that others have not seen the 1666 Teocaltiche confirmations, nor considered the frequency with which "Diego Alonso" appears in these primary source records. Why don't we see "Diego de Hermosillo"?

To me, it makes perfect sense, "Alonso de Hermosillo" falls in line with other branches using "Ramirez de Hermosillo" "Garcia de Hermosillo," etc, but in this case, apparently, only those named "Diego" would use the surname into adulthood, so it became extinct, once that name fell out of fashion.

Everything I know about this line has been non-primary source, and it's not corresponding with what I'm seeing on the ground. I am in no way an expert on colonial naming or notarial practices, and there are surely documents I haven't seen, but I know enough to recognize when something seems out of place. According to the cited records, "Alonso" is the surname, and there is nothing in them that says different.

Gracias y saludos,

Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Btw, looking at the 29 Dec 1666 Confirmaciones en Teocaltiche: I misread the Andres Alonso entry: Francisco Sanchez is the padrino, the mother isn't listed. This is likely Andres Munoz de Hermosillo.

Left image, midpage:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22796-47?cc=1874591&wc…

Manny Diez Hermosillo

In reply to by jrefugioghermosillo

Comment

Hello Nuestros Ranchos Forum,

My ancestor Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo is married to Maria Munoz and lookin through old posts i saw this and needed help explaining it. It says theres a Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo who is the father of Maria Munoz's husband Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo and also on here theres a Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo who has a wife name Leonor Parra Sanches. Are the Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo's the same people? possible the same people? Dad and son? or not the same people at all? I tried lookin on the internet but that just made it worse. theres to many trees that don't match each other and that don't match here on the forum. Also is the oldest Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo that's married to Catalia Ramirez not part of the tree anymore or is he probably the father of one of these Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo;s. Thanks Everybody

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Hi Daniel,

At this time, things are inconclusive.

I think Armando’s post from 2 feb 2015 says it best:

“…Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra was in Mexico City with a wife and children from 1558 through 1597 then he was not in Guadalcanal in 1581 through 1582 with wife and children when the brother of our Juan González de Hermosillo sent for him on 12 October 1581.
The first child of Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and Ana Rodríguez de Madaleno was Leonor and she was baptized 15 June 1559 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-14029-44
These are two different families. They are probably related due to the fact that they both use the García Hermosillo and González de Hermosillo surnames and they are all originally from Guadalcanal. But Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz are two different people.”

Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Thank you Manny. This is kinda confusing but If the 2 Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo's are not the same and the 2 Gonzalo de Hermosillo's are not the same, but we know our Juan Gonzales de Hermosillo's father is name Gonzalo de Hermosillo and the father of the other Juan Gonzales de Hermosilo who is married to Ana Rodrigues Magdaleno is named Gonzalo de Hermosillo, could the older Gonzalo de Hermosillo be the father of our Gonzalo who is the father of our Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo. Also is the Magdaleno married to the other Juan related to our Magdaleno's?

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Danny,

We need to be careful with speculating on the family of either Gonzalo García de Hermosillo.

First of all, we don't have any documentation that our Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo was ever in Mexico. Since we descend from the Juan González de Hermosillo that went to Mexico in 1582 all we have is the letter by his brother Gonzalo García de Hermosillo asking for Juan González de Hermosillo, his wife, and children to be given a license to go to Mexico from Guadalcanal, Spain and the subsequent license. It states that the father of Juan González de Hermosillo is Gonzalo García Hermosillo. Lookup Juan González de Hermosilla and INDIFERENTE,2060,N.138 in the Búsqueda Avanzada at http://pares.mcu.es. The father is named on page 5. We don't have the mother or grandparents of our Juan González de Hermosillo.

Since Sergio Gutierrez shared the testimony of Domingo de Lomelín that states that " Juan gonzales de hermosillo y de ana [maria] munos su mujer naturales de guadalcanal" http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948#comment-21858 then we know they are the couple that were from Guadalcanal and not the couple that was from Mexico City nor the son of that couple since he was also from Mexico City and not from Guadalcanal and he would have been too young to have been our ancestor.

That means that we have no idea how Juan García de Hermosilla, que pasó a Nueva España en 1535 that is mentioned in the link above is related to our Gonzalo García de Hermosillo or to the other Gonzalo García de Hermosillo.

Comment

Thank you Armando. I guess i got over excited trying to find out who Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillos parents are and I guess I thouht people with the same names have to be related but i guess its harder than that. I'll look at other places on my tree for now.

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Danny,

Here's some more info even though you are already looking at your other lines.

He might be the Juan de Hermosilla son of "Hernán Pacheco y de Inés de Hermosilla, vecinos de la villa de Escalona" that went to Peru in 1537. CONTRATACION,5536,L.5,F.18V(2) so he doesn't even look to be from Guadalcanal.

There was also a Juan de Hermosillo from Burgos, son of Alonso de Hermosillo y de Catalina González, that went to Mexico in 1515. The license for passage is at http://pares.mcu.es CONTRATACION,5536,L.1,F.406(1)

For a long time many thought that Juan de Hermosillo was the ancestor of the Juan González de Hermosillo that married Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno but the CONFIRMACION DE OFICIO: FRANCISCO HERMOSILLO from 1607 MEXICO,177,N.58 shows that they aren't related, at least not in the way they once thought they were. I would still like to get a hold of Jaime Holcombe's sheets on that family to see what he had.

Coincidentally, Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno was the daughter of Gonzalo Rodríguez Magdaleno and María Hernández. They were the parents of María Magdaleno Hernández who married Cristóbal Pérez López and they were the parents of María Pérez the wife of Cristóbal de Villalobos and they were the parents of the following -

Francisco de Villalobos y Pérez 1595 casado el 22 de mayo 1640 con María Vásquez de Retamosa

Tomás de Villalobos y Pérez de Nava 1604- casado alrededor de 1634 con Catarina Macías Valadez y Villegas

Those two brothers are the ancestors of almost all of the Villalobos from Los Altos de Jalisco and Aguascalientes.

Comment

Thank you Armando, this is great information. I saw on one of the old posts someone say that Alonso de Hermosillo and Catalina Gonzalez was where they got the Gonzalez de Hermosillo but I guess thats not true. There seems like a lot of made up trees on geni about the Hermosillo's. Thank you for the villalobos's, I have a couple villalobos's in my tree to. I'll see if I can connect my ancestors to these new villalobos's.

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Hola primos,

Here are the ordenes for Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo; he was still using the name "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo," and his father had already passed away by 24 Oct 1701.

24 Oct 1701, primera tonsura y cuatro grados: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18376-10366-31?cc=1874591&wc…

12 Feb 1703:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18378-5360-44?cc=1874591&wc=…

All I can say is, I'm happy he decided he didn't have a vocation... or else, many of us wouldn't be here....

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Hola primos,

This is the dispensa for Luis Flores de la Torre and Teresa Muñoz de Hermosillo. 17 Apr 1720, Jalostotitlan, who were are 4o grado, descending from two sisters: Francisca de Torres and Paula de Torres, daughters of Nicolas Ramirez and Polonia de Torres:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-12639-27?cc=1874591&wc…

The genealogy given:

Paula de Torres-1-Francisca de Torres
Juana Ramirez-2-Miguel Hermosillo
Juan Flores-3-Cristobal Muñoz
Luis Flores-4-Teresa Muñoz

Relevant to this thread is Paula de Torres, who was married to Diego Alonso del Pedroso y Hermosillo.

“Juana Ramirez” appears in none of the padrones for Jalostotitlan between 1649 and 1679, and I believe the name is incorrect in the dispensa. In the padrones, she was called “Maria de Hermosillo,” and this would be her burial record from 09 Nov 1659, which I think I posted earlier in this thread (right image, bottom, and continues on next image):
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-51026-87?cc=1874591&wc…

I’ve inverted and tweaked the image enough to make out: “en el puesto que es de Paula de Torres en nuebe dias del mes de noviembre del año de mil seis cientos cinquenta y nuebe murio /next image/ Maria de Hermosillo española muger que fue de Pedro Flores Habiendo confesado…”

We see enough to know 2 things: 1) the puesto now belongs to Paula de Torres, so Diego Alonso has already passed away, and 2) Maria de Hermosillo was married to Pedro Flores (who were the parents of Juan Flores de a Torre, also of Nicolas Flores, as established in this dispensa for Baltasar Arias and Ana de Anda 27 May 1707, Jalos:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18412-59266-15?cc=1874591&wc…).

Paula de Torres appears on all of the padrones through 1673, but not in 1679; only their son, Alonso Ramirez, is left on the estancia with some slaves and criados. So she died between 1673-1679.

That said, here’s what I have for the family group of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres, the birth years of their children are calculated from those given in the 1649 & 1650 padrones of Jalos:

Diego Alonso del Pedroso y Hermosillo b ? - died 1650-Nov 1659, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco.
Paula de Torres b. ? Aguascalientes; died - 1673-1679, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco.

1. Diego Alonso de Hermosillo, m. Luisa Muñoz de Nava, 23 Feb 1645, Teocaltiche, Jalisco.
2. Capitan Agustin Garcia de Hermosillo, b. 1624, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco; m. Maria Muñoz de la Barba.
3. Mathias Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 1626, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco
4. Alonso Ramirez, b. 1628, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco
5. Maria de Hermosillo, b. 1630 - d. 9 Nov 1659, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco; m. Pedro Flores de la Torre.
6. Nicolas Ramirez de Hermosillo, b. 1633, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco; m. Francisca Muñoz de la Barba.
7. Paula de Torres, b. 1645 - d. 18 Oct 1688, Jalostotitlan, Jalisco.

Diego Alonso de Hermosillo II appears in none of the Jalos padrones, since he had already moved to Teocaltiche by 1645.

Mathias Gonzalez de Hermosillo, I have nothing on. He appears only on the 1649 & 1650 padrones, and then he disappears. Does anyone know if & whom he married, and whether he had issue?

Alonso Ramirez appears on all of the Jalos padrones, 1649-1679, and apparently inherits the estancia after his mother, Paula de Torres, dies. No spouse is ever listed, so I don’t think he married.

Paula de Torres, the youngest daughter, died without having married; she was around 25 years old, and had been “sin juicio,” perhaps due to an illness or to a condition.

Gracias y saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Hola primos,

This is the capellania for Beatriz Muñoz de Nava, daughter of Francisco Muñoz de Nava & Maria Sanchez, founded 18 May 1667, in Teocaltiche:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-36333-16?cc=1874591&wc…

This is relevant to this thread, because her albaceas were her brother-in-law, Diego Alonso de Hermosillo (m. Luisa de Nava), and Pedro de Guelbes. Since Beatriz had no descendants, the patronage of this capellania passed down through the descendants of Diego Alonso and Luisa de Nava, through their son, Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo (m. Antonia Alvarez Tostado).

I haven’t had a chance to pick it clean, but here’s a summary:

This capellania establishes:

1. That Beatriz Muñoz de Nava was the sister of Luisa Muñoz de Nava (m. Diego Alonso).
2. Properties owned by Beatriz Muñoz de Nava (including homes in Teocaltiche proper, located between those of Diego Alonso and her father, Francisco Muñoz de Nava.
3. That Diego Alonso de Hermosillo-Torres was born before Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo-Torres.
4. It also establishes the genealogy of some of the descendants of Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo-Nava and Antonia Alvarez, as well as those of Diego Alonso and Juana de Alderete, and how they’re related to each other.

The sons of Diego Alonso and Juana Alderete (Sebastian Gonzalez de Hermosillo, Diego Alonso de Hermosillo and Cayetano Gonzalez de Hermosillo) contest the patronage on 16 Dec 1708, claiming that it should have passed down through their father, Diego, since he was the oldest son of Diego Alonso and Luisa de Nava:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-36052-14?cc=1874591&wc…

It also speaks of a capellania founded by their sister, Feliciana Gonzalez de Hermosillo-Nava, and one founded by Francisco Muñoz de Nava.

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Hi Danny,

That is a really good question, with a really complex answer. The best answer I’ve seen is from this page, which you should bookmark: http://www.somosprimos.com/spanishterms/spanishterms.htm

“(1) Chaplaincy of masses established for the soul of a deceased person or persons on a principal sum of money or the value of real property. Its yield of five (5) percent annual interest was paid to the cleric who said the masses. (2) chaplaincy, subsidized by the crown, at a presidio or military headquarters. The beneficiary (priest) was a capelldn or cura castrense.”

In this case, definition (1). From what I can make of it, it was used like a trust fund, for descendants who joined a religious order, to help cover expenses and pay for one’s education. It was one of the methods the Church used to sustain itself.

Relative to our interests, there might be hundreds of pages, with entries made over decades, regarding ownership and administration of a capellania. They are useful in that they are usually passed down amongst family members, so you get a record of relationships.

I hope that’s helpful. Perhaps someone has a clearer answer?

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Danny,

My Spanish dictionary says that a capellania is a "chaplaincy", I guess where a chaplain lives.

Emilie
Port Orchard, WA

> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:31:14 -0700
> From: dcalonso97@gmail.com
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Capellania of Beatriz Muñoz de Nava
>
> Hello Manny what is a Capellania mean?
>
> Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Hola primos,

These are various capellanias related to the Diego Alonso del Pedroso line. Thanks to Katy Brecht, for indexing these!

Alonso Ramirez de Hermosillo: the mysterious son of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres, who appears in all of the Jalos padrones between 1649-1679. As far as I can tell, he never married nor had issue, so descendants of his siblings would be capelanes. Establishes that he is brother of Augustin Garcia and Nicolas Ramirez.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18381-22934-43?cc=1874591&wc…

This is regarding a capellania founded by Josepha Ramirez de Hermosillo, linked to her brother Cristobal Ramirez de Hermosillo. They were children of Nicolas Ramirez de Hermosillo and Francisca Munoz de Barba. On img160 is the testamento of Josepha Ramirez; on img200, there is a great genealogy given:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18381-57648-31?cc=1874591&wc…

These are capellanias founded by children of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo and Luisa de Nava:

Capitan Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo-Nava (m. Antonia Alvarez Tostado)
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18401-35148-67?cc=1874591&wc…

Francisco Muñoz de Hermosillo-Nava
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18401-20431-24?cc=1874591&wc…

Melchor Gonzalez de Hermosillo-Nava
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-61207-18?cc=1874591&wc…

Saludos!
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Paige,

No, it isn't certain but additional proof would be needed, but there are no records whatsoever that I, or Manny, can find that show Diego Alonso del Pedroso ever used the Ramírez surname, as Manny had pointed out. In order to make that assumption we would need to find a document that does that. Unfortunately, most documents from Jalostotitlán from that period no longer exist. Supposedly they were lost in a fire. There is a book by Sergio Gutiérrez with the padrón from 1650 you can buy at Amazon that supposedly has Diego Alonso del Pedroso with his wife and six of seven of his children. Search for Jalostotitlán at Amazon to find it. Another record to search for is a Cofradía from 1627. Until then the Ramírez surname should be taken off of Diego Alonso del Pedroso because otherwise it is a presumption. Yes, descendants of Diego Alonso could've used Muñoz as descendants of María Muñoz but there are no indications whatsoever that he ever did so his descendants that did use it was because of Luisa Muñoz, therefore the only person we would attach Muñoz to are the people that have a mother with the surname Muñoz making it their maternal surname.

Yes, Diego Alonso González de Hermosillo and a Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo married to Luisa Muñoz are the same person. Alonso and Ildefonso are first names used interchangeably during that period.

Armando

Comment

I'm trying to determine what is the correct origin of the González de
Hermosillo. Elsewhere on the forum I've see this:

· Pedro Fernández de Hermosilla
· Alonso de Hermosilla casó a Catalina González hija de Tomás González
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Catalina Ramírez
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Isabel de Escobar hija del Conq. Juan de
Burgos
· Juan González de Hermosillo. Casó a María Muñoz Cabeza de Vaca hija de
Francisco Muñoz y de aquí nació la línea alteña.
Then it seemed as though Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez
Magdaleno were agreed upon as the parents of the Juan González de
Hermosillo that married María Muñoz. But lately, I've seen several websites
list Gonzalo García de Hermosillo as the origin of our González de
Hermosillo.

Since, my Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo uses Ramírez, it makes
sense that the line would travel through Catalina Ramírez and Juan González
de Hermosillo, but I don't know.

Is there anyone in the forum that has a theory?

Paige Herrera

Comment

Hi Paige, My name is Robert Gonzalez, I am a direct descendent of Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo, he and Maria Munoz are my 10th great grandparents.

All the research I've done as of late shows Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo as Juan's father. ( And a brother of the same name )

I've been working with a very nice gentleman from Spain who is helping me with such questions, but it's been slow going. As you may be aware, Juan was from Guadalcanal, perhaps some of the confusion comes from the origins of the de Hermosilla line. It appears (at the moment ) that the family origins are indeed from the province of Burgos, specifically Ona\Briviesca, of which Hermosilla is a part of. Before of course they made their way south to Guadalcanal. I don't want to jump the gun and give bad info, I need to sort out names and dates, but the line may include members of the military orders of Santiago and the so called Caballeros de Banda de Castilla. I've come across spelling variations, Gunsaliz,Gonzalis,Gonsales and of course there are many Lopez,Fernandez,Ramirez,Alonso's to sort out as well. I have seen a website Geni.com with some of those names, the farthest back is Pedro Fernandez de Hermosillo with a birthdate of 1450 in Spain. I don't know who posted that info,I haven't run across those names as of yet. It does concern me that names are listed as "Hermosillo" as opposed to "Hermosilla" as the name was known in Spain.

Perhaps Armando can help shed some light on all this as well. I've been meaning to contact him and share what I have with him as well as my other primos who share this lineage.

Best,

Robert~

Comment

Hi Paige,

There’s been some confusion regarding the origin of the Gonzalez de Hermosillo who proliferated throughout Nueva Galicia. As Robert mentioned, it’s been determined that the line originated with Juan Gonzalez de Hermosilla & Maria Muñoz, from Guadalcanal, Sevilla, and he was the son of Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosilla.

Here’s a link to one discussion on that topic: views:http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/19948

If you descend from the Diego Alonso’s, then the “Ramirez” probably comes from Nicolas Ramirez, whose daughter Paula de Torres married Diego Alonso del Pedroso y Hermosillo. Their offspring used “Ramirez de Hermosillo.” There were 5 Diego Alonso’s, in a direct line, here’s the first four:

Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo & Maria Muñoz m. Guadalcanal, Sevilla antes de Extremadura, España.
http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948#comment-21858
Diego Alonso del Pedroso & Paula Ramirez Torres
Proof of genealogy
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-37884-27?cc=1874591&wc…
Diego Alonso de Hermosillo & Luisa Muñoz de Nava m. 23 Feb 1645
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-2338-11?cc=1874591&wc=…
Proof of genealogy
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-37884-27?cc=1874591&wc…
Diego Alonso de Hermosillo & Juana de Alderete m. 19 Feb 1669 Teocaltiche
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-3066-6?cc=1874591&wc=1…
Proof of genealogy
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-37884-27?cc=1874591&wc…
Diego Ildefonso Gonzalez de Hermosillo & Lorenza Manuela Cabrera m. 13 May 1716 Asientos
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11877-64280-42?cc=1502404&…
Información Matrimonial https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11132-148155-54?cc=1502404…
Vicente Gonzalez de Hermosillo & Juana Dorothea Díaz de Leon married about Jan 1764
Información Matrimonial https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15243-320-34?cc=1804458&wc=M…
Rafael Gonzalez de Hermosillo & Maria Dolores de Avila m 25 Nov 1798, Pinos.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15272-51812-83?cc=1804458&wc…
Juan Gonzalez & Asuncion Gil de Esparza, b. 02 Apr 1805, Aguascalientes; m3 Asuncion Gil Esparza, c. 1829, probably in Pinos.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11631-273053-80?cc=1502404…
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15257-11764-9?cc=1804458&wc=…
Antonio Gonzalez & Susana Sanchez, m. 20 Jun 1869, Pinos
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15242-652-90?cc=1804458&wc=M…

Andres Munoz de Hermosillo and Lorenza? Tiscareno also had a son named Diego Alonso de Hermosillo. So, the name appears in various lines, in different generations & places.

Who was your Diego Ildefonso married to, and where did your people live?

And Robert, I'd love to be part of your call-up, Gonzalez de Hermosillo being my main interest. I have some new findings regarding the Diego Alonso line that I'd like to share.

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Paige,

As Robert and Manny have told you, the paternal line of the González de Hermosillo line in Jalisco, which also spread to nearby Aguascalientes and Zacatecas, begins with Juan González de Hermosillo and María Muñoz from Guadalcanal, Sevilla which is now part of Andalucía, España. The father of Juan González de Hermosillo was Gonzalo García de Hermosillo based on a combination of two different documents that Sergio Gutiérrez very kindly commented on in two different threads pointing out the proof. Manny provided the link to one of those threads which is the one I had on Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno. So you don't have to go looking for it again the link is http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/19948

The reason for me posting this information is so you can understand how those documents prove the ancestry and where in that thread the proof is found even though the full thread is good to have and understanding of how and when the actual genealogy was fully understood by us.

The two documents that provide the proof of the origins of the González de Hermosillo line are a petition for Priestly Major Orders http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_orders and a petition for a license for to go to the Indies (America). Both of those documents are paleographed in the above thread under the post titled Solicitud Para Ordenes Mayores de Gonzalo de Hermosillo en 1655.

The petition for Priestly Major Orders was for Gonzalo Ramírez de Hermosillo on 15 July 1665. In the document Domingo de Lomelín provides testimony of the ancestry of Gonzalo Ramírez de Hermosillo. The portion that pertains specifically to his González de Hermosillo ancestry states that he was "hijo legitimo de Sebastian Ramírez y de Maria de Hermosillo....Juan de Aceves Rascón y a Beatriz de Hermosillo padres de la dicha Maria de Hermosillo y abuelos del dicho Gonzalo de Hermosillo [the petitioner] y que el dicho Juan de Aceves era natural de la ciudad de México y la dicha Beatriz de Hermosillo era de esta jurisdiccion hija legitima de Juan González de Hermosillo y de Ana Muñoz su mujer naturales de Guadalcanal y sabe que los susodichos los unos y los otros son cristianos viejos sin tener raza de moros ni de judios."

That above means that Juan González de Hermosillo y de Ana Muñoz were originally from Guadalcanal and they had Beatriz de Hermosillo as a legitimate daughter who married Juan de Aceves Rascón from Mexico City and they had María de Hermosillo who married Sebastián Ramírez who had Gonzalo Ramírez de Hermosillo as a legitimate son.

The petition for a license to go to the Indies (America) was started by Gonzalo García Hermosillo, a brother of Juan González de Hermosillo, 12 Oct de 1581 while he was living in Zacatecas and he asked to have his brother sent for. That information is found in a thread at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/18947#comment-19622 in a post by Guillermo Tovar de Teresa titled El genearca de los González de Hermosillo but his post has erroneous information as far as the name of the brother and of the father of Juan González de Hermosillo. The correct names are towards the end of this post.

The original documents can be downloaded from http://pares.mcu.es/ by going to Búsqueda Avanzada then putting in INDIFERENTE,2060,N.138 under FILTRO POR SIGNATURA then click Buscar then click Indiferente General then click on Juan González de Hermosilla then on ver imágenes. Then you can download the documents from there.

Once Juan González de Hermosillo was sent for he put in his petition for a license in 1582. On the first page of that document it states "Juan González de Hermosilla labrador vzo (vecino) de la villa de Guadalcanal dice que el tiene un hermano en la Nueva España en las minas de las Zacatecas y a enviado a llamar para hacerle algun bien porque el aca padece necesidades suppco a.v. ala [suplico a vuestra alteza] le haga merced de dar licencia para que pueda pasar con sus muger hijos atento y que no es de los prohibidos para pasar aquellas partes y en ello recibiran merced y que puedan llevar una una moça para su servicio"

So in that part we see that Juan González de Hermosillo was sent for by his brother in the mines of Zacatecas and that he was already married with kids in Guadalcanal and asked to go to Nueva España with his family and a young female servant.

The third image of the petition names his brother as Gonzalo García de Hermosilla.

The fifth image is the letter from Zacatecas which states "Sepan cuantos esta carta vieren, como yo, Gonzalo García Hermosillo... para que en mi nombre podaiís ir a la villa de Guadalcanal que es en los reinos de Castilla a traer de dicha villa a mi hermano Juan González de Hermosillo, mi hermano, hijo de Gonzalo García de Hermosillo..... que es hecho en las minas de los Zacatecas a once días del mes de octubre de mil quinientos ochenta y un años..."

So here we see that Juan González de Hermosillo and Gonzalo García Hermosillo are calling each other brothers and Gonzalo states that the father of Juan González de Hermosillo is named Gonzalo García de Hermosillo. We can assume that since all three use the surname Hermosillo that the two brothers had the same father.

In summary there are two different documents 83 years apart that maintain the Juan González de Hermosillo and María Muñoz were from Guadalcanal, Spain. One of those documents verifies that they were married with kids in 1582, while in Guadalcanal, which means it is impossible for that Juan González de Hermosillo to have had anything to do with the Juan González de Hermosillo b. 8 de Julio de 1571 en Asunción, Cd. De Méx who was the son of Juan González de Hermosillo cc Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno.

Hopefully this post makes it clear so that all of the trees that have erroneous information can be corrected.

Armando

Comment

Armando, Manny, Robert,

That was an exhaustive amount of information that clearly proves the
lineage of the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz. Gonzalo
García de Hermosillo is definitely the origin of our González de
Hermosillo.

Do we know who this Juan is or how he's connected to our González de
Hermosillo:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-12358-6?cc=1615259&wc=M…

Comment

No, we don't know. The fact that he had the same name and assumed to be living in the same time period in Mexico caused people to think that he was the one that was the patriarch of the lineage in Los Altos. In reality they weren't both living in Mexico the whole time. Our Juan González de Hermosillo was living in Spain since his birth sometime before 1562 and 1582. We don't know what happened to the Juan González de Hermosillo born in Mexico City on 8 July 1571.

If you notice in my thread I had provided to you previously at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948 I ask about Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno, the wife of Juan González de Hermosillo. That is the exact same couple that are the parents of the one that you have a link to in your post. If you go further down in my thread on Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno you will see the information by Daniel much of which you also posted in your first post of this thread that said -

· Pedro Fernández de Hermosilla
· Alonso de Hermosilla casó a Catalina González hija de Tomás González
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Catalina Ramírez
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Isabel de Escobar hija del Conq. Juan de Burgos
· Juan González de Hermosillo b. 8 de Julio de 1571 en Asunción, Cd. De Méx. Casó a María Muñoz Cabeza de Vaca hija de Francisco Muñoz y de aquí nació la línea alteña.

If you look at the date and place of 8 de Julio de 1571 en Asunción, Cd. De Méx that is the exact same document you are asking about and it is actually the son of Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno and not the son of Juan González de Hermosillo c Isabel de Escobar hija del Conq. Juan de Burgos.

By the way, I edited my previous post due to an error of mentioning Isabel de Escobar and the wording needed improvement.

Armando

Comment

Also, in my post on 2011-10-04 at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948 I answered Daniel that Guillermo Tovar de Teresa had the parents of Juan González de Hermosillo as Juan González de Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno (o Madaleno o Ana Hernández) and that he thought that Juan González de Hermosillo was from Guadalcanal based on his post at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/18947#comment-19622

It wasn't until Sergio's post that I understood that they were different people. In that post he says "Si Juan Glz de Hermosillo es originario de Guadacanal, segun las declaraciones en el documento, como es posible que el haya sido bautizado en Mexico DF en 1572. Creo son homologos y no la misma persona."

Which mean "If Juan Glz de Hermosillo is originally from Guadalcanal, per the declarations in the document, how is it possible that it is the same person that was baptized in 1572. I believe they are of the same name but not the same person."

Armando

Comment

Armando,

I understand now. I was a little confused. I had previously read some of
the earlier posts but wasn't quite sure who was being referred to. Also, I
erroneously assumed, that since Juan González de Hermosillo born July 8th,
1571 used the same compound surname that he must be connected to our line.

I had mentioned about some of the Hermosillos use of Ramírez and where that
might have originated from and there was a mention earlier on the
thread about Ramírez coming through Paula de Torres, but, doesn't Paula de
Torres' husband Diego Alonso del Pedroso also occasionally use Ramírez,
which would suggest it originates earlier on the Hermosillo line?

Paige

Comment

Paige,

I just realized that there is a marriage record that has important information. Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres had a son that also went by Diego Alonso. He married Luisa Muñoz de Nava 23 Feb 1645 in Teocaltiche and the padrinos were none other than Alonso Ramírez and Paula de Torres. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-2338-11

So now we have a document that show that Diego Alonso del Pedroso married to Paula de Torres did actually use the Ramírez surname, as has been stated by other researchers, and therefore, the use of the Ramírez surname isn't necessarily due to the surname of the father of Paula de Torres.

Unfortunately, there aren't any baptisms of the children of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres to see which surname he uses in those records. There is also no baptismal, marriage, or death/burial record of Diego Alonso del Pedroso to see which surname was used in those records. None of the other children of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres have a marriage record that has been found. Supposedly Diego Alonso del Pedroso was buried 11 Feb 1673 in Teocaltiche but I haven't found that record.

There still might be other types of records we haven't seen that other researchers have seen that show Diego Alonso del Pedroso using the Ramírez surname.

Armando

Comment

You know, Armando, I thought the same thing, that their padrinos were his parents. But lately, I'm thinking the madrina, Paula de Torres, might be Diego II's sister. who died a spinster, 18 Oct 1668, in Jalostotitlan:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-50208-85?cc=1874591&wc…

I don't know who Alonso Ramirez is.

Here's my take, on the name:

Note, in the header of that marriage record, he is listed as "Diego Alonso" and she as "Luisa de Nava," while in the body, he is listed as "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo." The same formula is used for their son's marriage to Juana Alderete:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-3066-6?cc=1874591&wc=M…

From the few primary source documents I've seen (I have none for the 1st), the Diego's are usually listed as "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo," or just "Diego Alonso." I haven't seen them listed as "Diego de Hermosillo," so "Alonso" is the logical surname, and only the Diego's use this name.

I have yet to see any primary source documents with "Pedroso," but it's obvious that the ancestral name is "Diego Alonso del Pedroso, who was likely a maternal ancestor of either Juan GdeH or Maria Munoz.

"Ramirez" seems to appear only in secondary source documents, as an add-on by later generations, who needed to establish parentesco. The name is appropriate, but I haven't seen any primary source documents with either of them using this name.

It's not until the 4th Diego Alonso that we see "Gonzalez" appear in the name:

In Sep 1704, he was an acting notary on some IM's in Pinos, Zacatecas; he signed his name, "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo":
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15261-3424-99?cc=1804458&wc=…

On his 1718 IM, when he married Lorenza Manuela Cabrera, he is already going by "Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo" (his father is also given "Gonzalez" in this IM, though I have no other record with him listed thus):
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11132-148155-54?cc=1502404…

The 5th Diego would drop "Alonso" altogether, and went by "Diego Gonzalez de Hermosillo":
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18558-28684-51?cc=1874591&wc…

So that where I'm at, as far as the name & surname.

What is interesting to me, is how this line migrated: Diego Alonso II married Luisa de Nava in Teocaltiche; did he move there with his parents, or alone? His sister Paula de Torres, died 1668 in Jalostotitlan, where her widowed mother was living, so I'm inclined to think Diego II made the move by himself. Anybody?

Diego Alonso III (married to Juana Alderete), probably died in early summer 1708, in Teocaltiche, since most of his children moved to Ojuelos, Jalisco, by Aug 1708. Juana Alderete died on Ojuelos and was buried 19 Feb 1723, in Pinos, Zacatecas:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15236-5024-92?cc=1804458&wc=…

I have some excellent documentation on Diego Alonso IV, which I'll post here, as soon as I have a minute.

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Manny,

After going back over Retoños de España Tomo VI Volumen 2 pg. 732 it does say in the first paragraph that the Ramírez de Hermosillo surname was taken up due to the marriage of a member of the González de Hermosillo family marrying a daughter of the Ramírez family.

I had concentrated on the Retoños de España Tomo VI Volumen 2 pg. 733 where it states Paula de Torres married "Diego Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso, conocido también con los apellidos González de Hermosillo y del Pedroso y Hermosillo hijo de Juan González de Hermosillo y de María Muñoz, vecinos de la jurisdicción de Jalostotitlán" I had expected Mariano González Leal to have mentioned that the surname Ramírez started with his sons and not with him in that portion if that was the case. However, as I had stated above the first paragraph in on pg. 732 clarifies that it did start with the sons. It sure is strange that Mariano decided to mention he had an alias that included the surname Ramírez when it's the surname given to his children.

As far as Alonso being a surname I can't agree with that.

The body of the marriage document stating that it is "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo" is what helps provide the proof that he is an Hermosillo. That is why that record has been used by other researchers. What shows up in the header is not proof that Alonso is his surname especially since many times there are errors in that portion.

Alonso has never been interpreted as a surname for this line by any researcher and I truly doubt that it is in this case. The names Diego Alonso and Diego Ildefonso are a first and second name used together through many generations. If you remember, I gave you the link to the IM of Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo and Lorenza Manuela Cabrera so I was already of aware of that record. The fact that his name and his father's names are Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo shows us that Diego and Ildefonso was used as a first and second name in more than one generation and it has been used in conjunction with the compound surname of González de Hermosillo. This tells me Diego Alonso was used in the same manner as Diego Ildefonso, as a first and second name.

For more information on the use of the names we need to find the Cofradía document of 1627 and the padrón of 1650 that mention Diego Alonso del Pedroso and the document the death record of his son and husband of Luisa Muñoz 11 Feb 1673 in Teocaltiche as well as the will of his second wife María de Rentería y Orozco to see how they are mentioned in those records. All of those records are mentioned in Retoños de España Tomo VI Volumen 2.

Armando

Comment

Manny, Armando and the rest of primos

I´m also a descendant of Juan González de Hermosillo and have been trying to clarify the ascendants of Juan while with no succes, but at least I have a theory that I would like you to see.

Looking through GENI and some other sites and complementing with PARES information, some other nodes of this forum and even with Wikipedia, I would propose the following:

Pedro Fernández de Hermosillo born around 1440 who was the father of

Alonso de Hermosillo born around 1465, who married Catalina González around 1485 that´s where the compound last name begins.

This couple is mentioned in the document of 1515 of Juan Gonzáles de Hermosillo to come to Indias where he states to be 20 years old, so he was born around 1495.

For now I suppose that this Juan González de Hermosillo married Catalina Ramírez del Pedroso around 1518 and that they had the folowing children :

Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 married ca1550 Isabel Escobar
Diego González Vega de Hermosillo bca 1525 married ca1550 María Rubio
Catalina García Hermosillo b1521 married ca 1540 Diego Gavilán

From Gonzalo and Isabel Escobar descend :

Gonzalo García Hermosillo bca 1550 who asks permission to bring his brother :
Juan González de Hermosillo bca 1555 married ca 1585 Ana María Muñóz

This last couple had the following children:

Juan bca 1591
Diego Alonso bca 1598 (Alonso was the name of his gggrandfather)
Francisco bca 1599
Leonor bca 1590
Cristóbal bca 1600
Theresa b 1589
Beatríz b 1593

From Diego González Vega descend :

Diego González de Hermosillo bca 1560 married ca 1585 Beatríz de Villegas
María Gutiérrez Rubio bca 1565 married ca 1590 Carlos Muñóz Aceves
Francisco Gutiérrez Rubio bca 1551 married ca 1576 Ana González Florida I

From Catalina García de Hermosillo descend :

Juan González de Hermosillo b 1541 married ca 1560 Ana Rodríguez Madaleno b30-I-1541
this last information is in :http://www.paginasprodigy.com.mx/glezgo/familiago/pafg20.htm#1885

This last couple were the parents of :

Gonzalo González de Hermosillo y Rodríguez Madaleno bca 1560 who made his vows to be a priest on 22-may-1583 and become Bishop of Nueva Vizcaya on 27-feb-1620 (Wikipedia;PARES)

THE BISHOP HAD THE FOLLOWING SIBLINGS :

Leonor González Madaleno b15-jun-1559 Mex,DF
Catalina González Madaleno b29-mar-1561 Mex,DF
Juan González de Hermosillo bjul-1571 Mex,DF

I´m thinking that the link between the Gutierrez de Hermosillo and de González de Hermosillo may be the "Floridas" women becaues we have :

María Gutiérrez Rubio González Florida bca 1565 who marries Carlos Muñóz Aceves

and the brother of this María Gutiérrez (Florida):

Francisco Gutiérrez Rubio bca 1551 marries ca 1576 Ana González Florida (I) bca 1555

I know this is not a valid genealogy but may push some interest to do more research

Best regards

Comment

Carlos,

The genealogy you posted is the incorrect genealogy. That is what my posts have been about. The person that married María Muñoz was married and living in Guadalcanal, Spain in 1582 when Gonzalo García Hermosillo asked to bring his brother. He could not have been born 8 Julio 1571 en Cd de Mexico to Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodriguez de Madaleno. This was pointed out by Sergio Gutiérrez and it is also pointed out by in the 2011 edition of Retoños de España Tomo IV Vol. 1 pages 209-211.

Please reread my previous posts in this thread and the links contained in the posts and download the original documents so you can see that the genealogy you posted is the incorrect genealogy.

To clarify, if he was married and living in Guadalcanal, Spain in 1582 how could his paternal grandparents have been Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 married ca1550 to Isabel Escobar if the parents of Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 were Juan González de Hermosillo and Catalina Ramírez del Pedroso and the document states that Juan González de Hermosillo came to the Indies in 1515 meaning he was already in the New World and that is where had descendants? If a person is living in the Spain and asking for permission to go to the New World it should be understood that his parents were born in Spain. If the parents were born in Spain then the parents can't be González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 unless he had gone back to Spain to marry Isabel Escobar and have children there apart from children in Mexico. That is way too complicated of a situation to be realistic.

The two families might be related but, if so, more distantly related.

Armando

Comment

Armando

I´ve seen all the previous posts and I agree that Juan González de Hermosillo the one who marries Ana María Muñóz IS NOT the son of Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno.

I´m saying ,based in the fact that we already know that the granfather of OUR Juan González was named Gonzalo González de Hermosillo, and that he must have been born around 1520, that this is THE GONZALO THAT MARRIED ISABEL DE ESCOBAR around 1550, and they were able to have:

Gonzalo GARCÍA DE HERMOSILLO bca 1550 (who asks permission for his brother Juan to come to America)
Juan bca 1555 who comes to America in 1582)

Now, I propose that the parents of the first Gonzalo González de Hermosillo were the conqueror Juan González de Hermosillo (who came in 1515) and Catalina Ramírez del Pedroso married ca 1518.

Besides Gonzalo González de Hermosillo they are the likely parents of :

Catalina GARCÍA HERMOSILLO born 1521 who married Diego Gavilán; Catalina García de Hermosillo would be then Aunt of GONZALO GARCÍA DE HERMOSILLO the brother of OUR Juan..........we must notice that they both USE THE LAST NAME "GARCÍA"

What is CLEAR about this last couple is that they are the parents of the BISHOP of Nueva Vizcaya : Gonzalo González de Hermosillo y Rodríguez Madaleno bca 1560, whose approval as bishop is dated 27-feb-1620 (PARES).

This bishop had the following siblings :

Leonor b 15-jun-1559
Catalina b 29-mar-1561
Juan b jul-1571

About the ancestors of the bishop what I think is interesting is that I saw in the web that he has the last name González de Hermosillo NOT BECAUSE OF HIS GRANDFATHER but through his GRAND MOTHER who is named Catalina García de Hermosillo born 1521 (not circa but 1521) who married ca 1540 Diego Gavilan......THIS ARE THE GRAND PARENTS OF THE BISHOP !!! and I think someone must have seen the "merits" of the bishop to be able to name the GRANDPARENTS !!

The chronology fits what is not clear is how the first Juan González who came to Indias in 1515, married ca 1518 and have his three children (Gonzalo, Diego and Catalina probably in Cuba), managed to send his children back to Spain, but that is not a crazy thing to have been done because he was to come to conquer Mexico with Cortés and he couldn´t bring his family with him to that risky enterprise.

So the generation born in the 20´s went to Spain and they grew and marry there between 1540 and 1550 and their children came to Mexico because their grandfather had earned lands and riches (I remember have seen some Estancias and or encomiendas given to Juan and Ruy González in the first half of the XVI century)

I tried to see the "merits" of the bishop but in the website of PARES only the "face" of the document is shown.

Comment

I made a mistake in one paragraph and the correct form should say :

Catalina GARCÍA HERMOSILLO born 1521 who married Diego Gavilán; Catalina García de Hermosillo would be then Aunt of GONZALO GARCÍA DE HERMOSILLO the brother of OUR Juan..........we must notice that they both USE THE LAST NAME "GARCÍA"

What is CLEAR about this last couple is that they ARE THE GRANDPARENTS of the BISHOP of Nueva Vizcaya : Gonzalo González de Hermosillo y Rodríguez Madaleno bca 1560, whose approval as bishop is dated 27-feb-1620 (PARES).

Comment

Carlos,

Your hypothesis still does not fit with the information that we have. I will try and clarify why that is, without using caps.

First of all, we don't know what the name of the grandfather of OUR Juan González de Hermosillo was named. We only know that his father was named Gonzalo González de Hermosillo.

We know that our Juan González de Hermosillo was married with children in 1582 therefore he was married at least 20 months prior to 1582. Since most people marry past 18 years of old even back then he is at least 20 years old making his birth year between 1532 and 1562. Therefore, his father Gonzalo García de Hermosillo was born in Spain anywhere between 1500 and 1544.

That is all we know about our Juan González de Hermosillo. We don't have any idea who his mother was or who his grandparents were. There is absolutely no evidence that the "Gonzalo González de Hermosillo" that married Isabel de Escobar was the grandfather of our Juan González de Hermosillo. Asserting that is pure supposition.

What makes your hypothesis even more unlikely, than it already was, is that the husband of Isabel de Escobar was "Juan Ramírez the legitimate son of Juan de Hermosillo, conquistador, and Catalina Ramírez" per Retoños de España Tomo IV Vol. 1 pg. 206. So her husband wasn't even named Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo to begin with.

No, we mustn't notice that they both use the last name "García" because that is a very common surname and there are no other documents at all that show that there is a close family tie.

Retoños de España only mentions two children of Juan González de Hermosillo and Catalina Ramírez. They were the above mentioned Juan Ramírez who lived his whole life in Nueva España and Catalina García de Hermosillo who married Diego Gavilán with whom they had children in Mexico City.

Most of the conquistadores stayed in Mexico because they were given land grants and they could live much better in Mexico than going back to Spain. Some told their sons to continue fighting on the frontier so they would have something to talk about once they grew older. These were not the type of people that would send their children to Spain, they raised them in Mexico.

So not only do the names and dates not fit your hypothesis the situation of the children going back to Spain is also unsubstantiated so the location also doesn't fit.

Saludos,
Armando

Comment

Hi Armando,

Thank you for the clarification, I don't want to lead anybody down the wrong path. I should have mentioned, my "Alonso" surname theory is conjecture, based on documents I've seen. I haven't had access to "Retonos," some day I need to make arrangements. I was totally unaware that Diego Alonso de Hermosillo also married Maria de Renteria y Orosco.

This is regarding the IV, Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo, who was married to Lorenza Manuela Cabrera:

I've found the following at Acervos Coloniales Siglos XVII A XIX (http://sigue.aguascalientes.gob.mx/axweb/):

On 20 Aug 1721, while living in Asientos, Aguascalientes, Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo and Lorenza Manuela de Cabrera sold el Puesto de Atenguillo, in Cuquio, Jalisco, to Alejo Plasencia (along with a lot in Cuquio), for 270 pesos. Atenguillo was owned by Lorenza Manuela's father, Antonio Cabrera, and they sold it on behalf of his heirs: Lorenza and her 2 brothers, Clemente Manuel Cabrera and Cayetano Cabrera, and her two half-brothers, Pedro Mercado and Cristobal Mercado.

There is a Concesion de Fianzas, dated 6 Jan 1724, in Asientos, Aguascalientes, with capitanes Diego Yldephonza Gonzalez de Hermosillo and Juan Nolasco Urbina, both residents and merchants in Asientos, providing bail(?) for a fellow merchant, who apparently couldn't pay his tribute in time (I assume, I am not yet familiar with the judicial lingo). We learn that Diego Yldephonzo was a merchant, and it's the only time I've seen him with the "capitan" title.

On a document from 3 Oct 1724, also in Asientos, Manuel Ugarte gives Diego Yldephonzo "poder especial."

Some day, I'll get around to transcibing these documents, but they can be found at the aforementioned website (there is another Diego Idlefonso de Hermosillo, in the Aguascalientes acervos, but he is the son of Andres Munoz de Hermosillo and Lorenza Tiscareno).

Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo was a notary public in San Matias, Pinos, Zacatecas, between 1728 and 1732, and his signature can be found on various IMs throughout those years: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15244-974-79?cc=1804458&wc=M…

He passed away and was buried 5 Jun 1735, in Pinos, Zacatecas; he was "found dead in the fields."
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15236-7398-27?cc=1804458&wc=…

Lorenza Manuel de Cabrera was buried 24 Sep 1748, also in Pinos:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15236-6117-24?cc=1804458&wc=…

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

Comment

Armando, Manny

I must be suffering from information overload because I've seen that
marriage of Diego Alonso Ramírez de Hermosillo and Luisa Muñoz before and
never noticed the padrinos were his parents. Or, individuals with similar
names. I don't know when the sister was born, so I couldn't say for sure. I
did however notice the margin just said Diego Alonso and did at one point
think that might be part of the surname. For whatever reason, I quickly
dismissed that idea.

Paige

Comment

Paige,

I am no longer considering the padrinos to be the parents, even though Paula could be the mother, since Retoños de España does say the the Ramírez surname was taken up by due to the marriage with Paula de Torres, which means her husband never actually used the surname.

Armando

Comment

Armando,

Is it certain that Alonso Ramírez is not Diego Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso.
I was looking at the records and the couple Paula de Torres and Diego
Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso seem to fit as padrinos. Even if the Ramírez de
Hermosillo was created by the union of Paula de Torres and Diego Alonso
Ramírez del Pedroso, that doesn't eliminate the possibility that Diego
Alonso also could be a Ramírez. Just as the Muñoz González de Hermosillo
was created by the union of Luisa Muñoz de Nava and Diego Alonso González
de Hermosillo, but, in theory, Diego Alonso could've used Muñoz himself as
a descendant of María Muñoz.

Also because the names get confusing, I wanted to check something. I've
seen Luisa Muñoz de Nava married to both a Diego Alonso González de
Hermosillo and a Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo, are they the same
person?

Paige

Comment

Hi Paige,
I do believe the Paula de Torres mentioned is the wife of Diego Alonso del Pedroso. If you look at this site: http://gw.geneanet.org/sanchiz?lang=es&p=diego+alonso&n=ramirez+del+ped…; the younger Paula de Torres is listed as being born in 1643. Even If you just try to piece together when everyone was born based on their marriages and such and you look at all their children, including, Nicolás Ramírez de Hermosillo and Agustín García de Hermosillo that married the two Muñoz de la Barba sisters, and Juana Ramírez de Hermosillo that married Pedro Flores de la Torre, as well as, Diego Alonso himself that married Luisa Muñoz de Nava, I doubt the younger Paula de Torres, was born any earlier than 1640. My guess is she was too young to be madrina at a wedding in 1645. Therefore, I think the Paula de Torres mentioned is most likely the wife of Diego Alonso del Pedroso. As for the Alonso Ramirez mentioned, Armando would be better able to answer that.

Also, Diego Alonso González de Hermosillo and Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo are the same person. I think there were several given names used in colonial times that were used interchangeably, including Ildefonso and Alonso. I don't think any differentiation is made between the two. I've seen them used interchangeably on numerous people with the name Ildefonso.
I've also noticed the same with their female equivalents Yldephonsa and Aldonsa. An example, being the marriage of Aldonsa Delgado and Juan de Dios Bernal: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11671-60802-23?cc=1502404&…
And the defuncion of the same Aldonsa, now listed as Yldephonsa Delgado, viudo de Juan de Dios Bernal: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-12142-72620-99?cc=1502404&…
Christopher de Cuellar

Comment

Paige,

The only other books that I know of at Amazon pertaining to our region of research are also by Sergio Gutiérrez. If you have ancestors from Lagos de Moreno and are interested in the books by Mario Gómez Mata you can contact him through Facebook (Gomez Mata Mario) or I can send you his email. The books that he has for sale are:

1.- La Alcaldía Mayor de Lagos, conquista y colonización de Pechititán

2.- Bautismos, defunciones y matrimonios del primer siglo de Santa María de los Lagos (1583-1663) que contiene todos los nombres y apellidos de españoles, indios, africanso y castas que nacieron, casaron y murieron en Lagos, hasta antes del año 1663.

3.- Iglesias virreinales de Santa María de los Lagos, con cuatro estudios de los que su servidor es autor del correpsondiente al templo del Rosario. Edición de lujo con papel lustre y fotografáis a color

4.- La esclavitud en Santa María de los Lagos siglos XVI-XIX.

5.- Relevo patronal en lagos. De san Sebastián a Nuestro Padre Jesús del Calvario. es un estudio sobre la religión católica y las imágenes que han venerado los laguenses a través de sus cofradías y hermandades en la villa de Lagos, y tres pueblos indígenas de La Laguna, Buenavista y Moya.

6.- Patronos y mártires alteños con varios estudios de los que uno es mío. en inglés y español.

7.- Efemérides de Lagos de Moreno desde la fundaicón hasta lesiglo XX.

Boderlandbooks used to have some that dealt with our region but there aren't many left and the ones that are left are expensive. The site is at http://www.borderlandsbooks.com/

Armando

Comment

Armando

I´m sorry I mixed terms in my proposal (not assertion), I meant to say that now is clear that the name of the father of OUR Juna González is Gonzalo, and then I (based on other websites) suggested that the wife of that Gonzalo was Isabel de Escobar Burgos.

Now I´ve seen that the husband of Isabel de Escobar was Juan Ramírez as you say is mentioned in "Retoños", but also in a very interesting "información" that the "Escobar" brothers raised in 1577 where they declare they are the children of Juan de Burgos and that they are poor in spite of their father being a "conquistador" who contributed largely to the conquest; the información explains that Juan de Burgos was owner of a Navío full of "bastimentos" with which he helped greatly to the conquest.

In that información is clearly mentioned the name of the husband of Isabel as Juan Ramírez.

I just found another very interesting document which I´m trying to read and is another INFORMACION asked by Francisco González de Hermosillo the son of Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno to be admitted as escribano de la ciudad de México.

In this information he names who his parents were, and most importantly....the name of his GRANDPARENTS !

From what I´ve been able to understand so far, he states that his father was Juan González de Hermosillo BORN in la villa de GUADALCANAL and that his mother was born in Mexico.

Francisco says the names of both his paternal and maternal grandparents and says tha his P Grandparents were Gonzalo Sr de Hermosillo and Leonor Sánchez Parra and the maternal were Juan Rodríguez de León (Magdaleno) and María Hernández vecinos de la cd de México but originarios de la VILLA DE GUADALCANAL.

The document has a lot more information but so far is what I´ve been able to understand, I know here in nuestros ranchos there are several skilled persons to do the paleography and hopefully we´ll have new facts about this family

Comment

The información I just mentioned is a little bit confusing and I think the right name of the parents of Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno are Gonzalo Rodríguez Magdaleno and María Hernández.

I mean, on page 5 of the document those are the names mentioned, later in the same document it seems to me that they mix the names of the brother in law of Francisco González de Hermosillo (Juan Rodríguez de León married to Leonor G de H known as "de la Parra" ) with María Hernández.

Comment

Armando

Precisely in the información I´m talking about, is attached an información that was previously gestioned by Juan González de Hermosillo (brother of Francisco)know there as "El Mozo" , son of Juan G de H and Ana R Magdaleno, that información was made "por poder" en la villa de Guadalcanal in 1584 and one of the two "apoderados" of Juan was Francisco Ramírez who is declared as "primo" of "El Mozo".

I have to correct the name of the grandfather of Francisco an Juan and now I clearly see that the correct name was Gonzalo García de Hermosillo.

I´m almost sure so far that this "Mozo" is the one that went to Nueva Galicia, and that he s not the same that was baptized on 1571 by the same parents because he couldn´t be doing that información in 1584 at 13 years of age; I think for some reason there´s another Juan in 1571 or the date is erroneous and should be 1541.

Comment

My take on the document is changing continously as long as I read it.

Th informacion of Francisco was betweeen 1606 and 1607 but it contains another información made on 1584 and it was made on behalf of Juan González de Hermosillo "El viejo" not "El Mozo". It is so because the witnesses are questioned if they knew Gonzalo garcía de Hermosillo and Leonor Parra parents of Juan, and that Juan was born in Guadalcanal but is "vecino in 1584" of Mexico City.

Comment

I´m not yet done with that "información" but so far I have the following :

Gonzalo García Hermosillo married Leonor Sánchez Parra and were the parents of

Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo born in Guadalcanal who travels to Mexico in 1582
and "por poder" asks an "información" to be made by his cousin Fco Ramírez 1584
this Juan marries ca 1558 Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno and thay have the following children :
Leonor 1559
Catalina 1561
Gonzalo 1562 (Bishop)
Juan 1571
María ca 1565

Then in a second wedding in Nueva Galicia :

Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo born in Guadalcanal who travels to Mexico in 1582
and "por poder" asks an "información" to be made by his cousin Fco Ramírez 1584
this Juan marries ca 1589 Ana María Muñóz and thay have the following children :

Theresa b 1589
Leonor bca 1590
Juan 1591
Beatríz b 1593
Diego b 1598
Francisco bca 1599
Cristóbal bca 1600

Comment

Regarding the padrinos of the marriage for Diego Alonso de Hermosillo and Luisa de Nava: as has been noted, we can't be sure that the padrinos, Alonso Ramirez and Paula de Torres, are the parents of the groom (Paula de Torres, still a possibility). I did an indexed search at FamilySearch for an "Alonso Ramirez" who'd fit the place & timeline, but nothing comes up in Teocaltiche, or early enough to consider. This will require sifting through the Teocaltiche and nearby parishes, to see if "Alonso Ramirez" appears anywhere else.

Armando: In "Retonos," does Don Mariano have siblings for Nicolas Ramirez, who was married to Polonia de Torres? Is Alonso Ramirez possibly his brother? Or even another son of Nicolas Ramirez and Polonia de Torres?

PAULA DE TORRES

Regarding the 1668 burial of Paula de Torres, hija de Paula de Torres, that I shared in an earlier post:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-50208-85?cc=1874591&wc…

I do not have this confirmed as the wife and daughter of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo; this is based on assumption: the father is not mentioned, and the only other reference is to Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo, who could be be "El Mozo." More research needs to be done. My assumption was that Diego Alonso de Hermosillo had already passed, since no father is mentioned, but if he married Maria de Renteria y Orosco en segundos, he would still have been alive.

As a note, I've seen "doncella" used on burial records for older women, who couldn't be younger than 40, so some notaries did use "doncella" for "soltera" or "spinster" (I've also seen "adulto" used for 14 year old's, and "parbulo" used for late teens 18-19). So, we need to keep that in mind, and that she could have been born earlier.

Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo

In reply to by jrefugioghermosillo

Comment

Manny,

I had abandoned the padrino Alonso Ramírez as also being the father of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo some time ago. He was probably a sibling or other relative of Paula de Torres. However, the dates are a better fit for the madrina being the mother of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo.

The Diego Alonso de Hermosillo that married Maria de Renteria y Orosco en segundas nupcias was the widower of Luisa Muñoz.

There isn't an Alonso Ramirez mentioned in Retoños de España as a sibling or other to Paula de Torres but there are lots of records missing so it is possible that he was a sibling to Paula de Torres.

Armando

Comment

Christopher,

I agree that the Paula de Torres that died 18 Oct 1668 in Jalostotitlán would have been too young to have been a madrina at her brother's wedding in 1645, not just because of the date on Geneanet but also because the record states that she died a doncella which means young maiden or young virgin. Since a lot of women didn't marry until the mid-twenties at that time the term doncella would have still been valid. The Paula de Torres at the wedding of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo in 1645 was definitely the mother.

Armando

Comment

Wow you're research is amazing! Welcome to Nuestros Ranchos and you are obviously a wonderful addition.
Linda Castanon-Long in B.C.

________________________________
From: Manny Diez
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:17 AM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] New Member Introduction and request for assistance on Gonzalez de Hermosillo

First of all, I want to thank all of you for all of the amazing work you've
done: when I began this project at the beginning of the summer, I saved my
maternal grandfather's ancestry for last, because I assumed it would be the
most difficult. We don't know much about our patriarch, J. Refugio G.
Hermosillo, before he crossed the border in 1926; he was 43 at the time,
and had already lived a lifetime. We had no contact with his family, his
parents and siblings dying long before we were born. All we knew was that
he was from a small town in Zacatecas called Montesa, and that, according
to him, he descended from one of the founding families. So, I wasn't
expecting to find much. But was I wrong! I started with his birth
certificate and the 3 generations named on it, and found the LDS website;
by the end of the first weekend, I had traced him all the way back to his
g2 grandparents, and only stopped, because the curas didn't list
grandparents before the late 18th Century (as you all know). But anyway, I
want to thank all of you, because I know SOMEONE had to index those
archives relative to Nueva Galicia, and I have a feeling it was YOU. MIL
GRACIAS A TODOS USTEDES, los nuevosrancheros y los somosprimoseros, for the
trailblazing work you've done and are doing, in regards to researching and
sharing the genealogy and history of Nueva Galicia and colonial Mexico in
general! (and for helping me make my 82 year-old mother and her 8 surviving
siblings very happy, learning about their colorful ancestors!)

A little background on my line: my grandfather, Jose Refugio Gonzalez, was
born in Montesa, Zacatecas, 4 Jul 1883, to Antonio Gonzalez and Susana
Sanchez. He was born with the Gonzalez surname, but some time while still
in Mexico, we figure around 1905, he changed it to "Hermosillo"; we never
knew why he changed it (we've often joked that he obviously didn't want
someone to find him…), nor why he chose "Hermosillo," but that's the name
he gave to his wife, Ana Olivas, of Juarez, as well as to their 11
children, born in California, and it's the name proudly worn by 5
generations of their descendants. "J. Refugio G. Hermosillo" was how he
always signed his name, and is the name on his death certificate and
tombstone.

That said, I started this endeavor not expecting to research the surname
"Hermosillo,"  since we assumed it had no history in the family prior to
1905 (and not even knowing the history of the surname in los Altos) - that
is, until I found the 1798 marriage record for grandfather's great
grandparents, Rafael Gonzalez & Maria Dolores de Avila, which clearly lists
the groom as:

"RAFAEL GONZALES DE HERMOSILLO, hijo legitimo de VICENTE GONZALES DE
HERMOSILLO y de JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON."

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/V5FZ-TSC

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15272-51812-83?cc=1804458&wc…

I was floored! I was thrilled! Alli esta mi segundo apellido! Y sera
alguien de categoria! Who was this GONZALEZ DE HERMOSILLO?? What did he
do?? How are we connected to him? What didn't abuelo tell us??

And that's where my journey really began. I googled the name and was led to
Nuestros Ranchos, amongst other websites, and I began reading through the
message boards. I learned about the conquistador, and his descendants
settling in los Altos, and about Gonzalez Leal's tomes, and the 117 spanish
families identified as the first-comers (and many whose surnames appear in
my tree), and how they intermarried throughout the Spanish Mandate (as I
witnessed, in my tree). And as I continue my research and get to know my
ancestors, I begin to feel a part of that history, that I am a product of
these adventurers, these hacendados, asistentas, capitanes, peones,
esclavos, and maybe even a Tlataoni… I was hooked! I need more! This is
better than a dusty old history book or any old video game!

So here I am, hoping to learn more about who it took to make me who I am,
and how they lived their lives, and hoping to share my findings with others
with the same intention, as well as with the same love for history. Muchos
somos parientes: les mando un fuerte abrazo.  Y perdoname por no escribir
en español, pero ya esta tarde y !hablo mucho!

My focus families are the following (I group them because these branches
tend to intermarry or are associated:

En Pinos & Ojuelos & Aguascalientes:

Gonzalez de Hermosillo,

Gil de Esparza

Diaz de Leon

De Avila

Carrillo Lisardi

Gonzalez Murguia

Duron

Alvarado

Martin de Sotomayor, Martin de Camacho, Lozano, de Ruedas y de Islas, and
associated lines

En Pinos & los Altos & Aguascalientes:

Gomez [de Sotomayor]

Tiscareño de Huerta (and the Tiscareño, Ruiz de Esparza and associated
lines)

Ruiz de Villaseñor

Sanchez de la Mejorada

Muñoz de ?

En Pinos & Aguascalientes:

Delgado (Diego & Isabel de Isla Martinez Lozano)

Delgado y Ocampo & Valensuela & Chevarria Merquelan

Gaitan & Arias de Bedolla (roots in SLP & GTO, including Cortes y Galvan)

Rodriguez de Herrera o de Jara

Other surnames I'm working on are Dominguez Samudio & Lopez del Castillo,
Candelas & Buenrostro, Bernal de la Serda, Lopez de los Reyes, Ortiz de
Anda.

And again, thank all of you, for laying down the groundwork, and making it
easier for us newbies, to find our way to our ancestors. .

Gracias y saludos,

Manuel Diez Hermosillo "Manny"

http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/jrefugioghermosillo

Introductions aside, I have my first request for assistance:

WHICH VICENTE GONZALES DE HERMOSILLO MARRIED JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON?

I have his name appearing in the documents of his children, grandchildren
and widow, but I have none of his vitals. And I've seen his name using
various combinations of "Jose Vicente Ferrer Gonzalez de Hermosillo"
(though not all at the same time). The problem is, there are numerous
"Vicente Gonzalez's" living during his possible time period and living in
the communities where he most likely lived (Pinos, Ojuelos y los Altos en
general, maybe Aguascalientes). I've been constructing the trees of each
and every one of them, to see which would correspond with mine, and I've
narrowed it down to three (for now). But I'm still stalled.

Here's what I have on my G4's Vicente Gonzalez and Juana Dorothea Diaz:

JOSE VICENTE FERRER GONZALEZ DE HERMOSILLO

b. 1734-1744. He married JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON, daughter of Andres
Diaz Duron and Maria Estephania Carrillo Diaz, some time between 1760-1764,
either in Pinos, Zacatecas, or in Ojuelos, Jalisco. She was born 4 June
1744 in Pinos, Zacatecas.

Their children were:

  1. Ma. Josepha Ignasia Pheliciana Gonzalez de Hermosillo,  b. 19 Nov
  1764, Ojuelos, Jalisco.
  2. Jose Vicente Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 11 Jun 1766, Pinos, Zacatecas
  3. Julian Antonio Rafael Gonzalez Diaz, b. 16 Apr 1768, Ojuelos, Jalisco.
  4. Maria Guadalupe de Santiago Gonzalez Diaz, b. 16 Jan 1771, Ojuelos,
  Jalisco.
  5. Antonio Rafael Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 3 Mar 1773, Ojuelos,
  Jalisco.
  6. Jose Romano Gonzalez Diaz, b. 12 Aug 1777, Montesa, Pinos, Zacatecas
  7. Maria Josefa Ignasia Gonzalez Diaz, b. 29 Mar 1779, Montesa, Pinos,
  Zacatecas.

They zigzag through those two communities, which is unusual in my lines.
The distance isn't great, but it wasn't like they could hop in the chevy
and drive to abuela's house, right? What did he do, that kept him (or her)
moving between ranchos?

Since their first child Maria Josefa Ignacia Phelicana was born on the
Buenavista in Ojuelos, in Nov 1764, I thought that might be a good starting
point for his birthplace and marriage. But again, it can be anywhere.

Juana Dorothea Diaz, widowed, would marry a second time to Francisco Xavier
Alonso, on 30 Nov 1781, in Montesa, Pinos, Zacatecas. So Vicente Gonzalez
died some time between 1779-1781, and probably in Montesa, Pinos. Juana
Dorothea was born in 1744, Vicente could've been born around the same time,
and just died tragically young. But, what if he was older, and had been
married before, and with children?

That is where I am. If anyone can lead me in the right direction, it would
be greatly appreciated, and I hope to pay it forward!

PS - On the partida for Rafael & Maria Dolores, note the padrinos: Jose
Trinidad Gil Esparza and Maria Ygnacia Gonzalez - Rafael's younger sister
and her fiance, who would marry two months later, their partida on the
opposite page: the couples took turns being each other's padrinos! Also,
Jose Trinidad was the brother of another g3 grandfather, Alexo Gil de
Esparza. I'm stuck on that line, as well: Gil's and Ruiz de Esparza's, from
Aguascalientes?

Looking for direct male descendant of Diego ROMO son of Diego ROMO DE VIVAR

Looking for direct male descendant of Diego ROMO (abt. 1630) son of Diego ROMO DE VIVAR (1589-1650) with family tree showing direct male connections.

Comments

Comment

Hello Xayme

I see that many have responded to your offer. You need to check the line of descent from whomever you are comparing yours to. Many many people have errors in their line so it is necessary that if you are comparing DNA samples that you also check out their line step by step. If you are stii looking for a direct diego romo de Vivar descendant with a line that can be verified, I can put you in touch with any of my numerous first cousins. My mother is a romo and any of my cousins from her brothers fit the bill. If you tell me where you live I can put you into contact with the cousin that lives closest to you. As to their descendancy from Diego Romo De Vivar, I can provide all the details.

R A Ricci

Comment

R A Ricci,

You should get DNA tests for you and your relatives so you can see how they work. If your Romo de Vivar relatives aren't willing to get DNA tests it would be of no value to Xayme.

I can also tell you that the people that match Xayme were recruited by me to the Nueva Galicia DNA project long before he made the offer. So they have nothing to do with the offer that he made. I know for a fact several of them have extremely well documented genealogies.

Thirdly, when the family trees at FTDNA have a lot of names the trees seem to indicate a different ancestor on the paternal line and seem to have inconsistencies but in reality they don't. Therefore, it can be hard to determine the line unless one has a large database of the descendants of Diego Romo de Vivar.

Armando

Comment

Hello Armando,
I will pay for the tests done by my first cousin. I am also curious about comparing the DNA of different Romo lines that have documented lines. I wasn't bringing up my cousins so they could get a. Free test from Jayme, I am interested in what results he gets from all the Romos that he can get. I do not know how to read these tests so besides getting copies, I would also like to have help reading them.
Thanks Armando

In reply to by R.A.Ricci (not verified)

Comment

R.A.Ricci,

I wasn't insinuating that you were bringing up your cousins so they could get a free test. There would have been nothing wrong with that though. Some people have very limited budgets. It wasn't clear if your cousin would be willing be tested which is partly why I posted what I did. Once you order the test and have access to the account it will be easier for me to explain the results.

If your cousin has agreed to be tested put both his email and your email on the account so both of you will get emails with the password and updates. If you order the test through the project it is cheaper. You want at least the Y-DNA37. You can always upgrade to the Y-DNA67 and Y-DNA111 at any time. If you put the order in before March 1 you can use a coupon code of 15for15 which expires Feb 28 at midnight. The link to use to order the tests and join the project is at https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?group=NuevaGaliciaDNA&cod…

Once you get the results you will be able to see the name, email, and family tree of the matches and how "close the match is" which isn't exact because DNA mutates randomly. If you and your cousin were to get the Family Finder you would be able to see the name, email, and family tree of autosomal matches.

I am willing to answer any questions, that don't reveal private information of participants, about DNA testing and results through whichever form of communication that you prefer.

Armando

Comment

Interesting, just before I opened up this topic I was looking at these record images 208 to 220,

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18698-47642-70?cc=1874591&wc…

My Great Grandfathers great great grandfather, Francisco Del Castillo's daughter Maria Francisca del Castillo Bonal, married into the Romo de Vivar line from San Juan de Los Lagos. Image 218 details the surname Romo de Vivar.

Still researching their offspring but I know that Francisca del Castillo and Ramon Romo married in Zacoalco de Torres, Jalisco, Mex. Going to research this line to see if there is any relation.
Zacoalco de Torres is named after the insurgent "El Amo Torres".

Comment

In the Genealogy of Mexico database there's one person who already took the test and there you can find his contact information:

http://garyfelix.tripod.com/index63.htm
http://garyfelix.tripod.com/index63.htm#RomoRM

It may take a while for the page to load.

In the Romo section it also appears a second Romo who took the test and is a 11/12 match to RM Romo. He appears as Anonymous, but maybe the administrator of that page can contact him in your name, or you can post in their Yahoo group.

Regards,
Victoriano Navarro

Comment

Victoriano,

There are more that have tested with FTDNA. Many of them are at https://www.familytreedna.com/public/NuevaGaliciaDNA/default.aspx?secti… under the group R1b-M269>L23>L51>L11>P312>U152>L2>Z367>L20 Descendientes de Diego Romo de Vivar b1550 Rielves,Toledo

Some of the Romo in that group have a solid tree which is why that group is separate and why it has that title. The other Romo that aren't R1b have a different genetic line.

Anyone that has had a 37 marker test can see their 37 marker matches and the email address of the match. So he is able to see the contact info of those that match his DNA as well as the trees that they have uploaded or created at FTDNA as long as the match still has an email associated with their FTDNA account.

I assume he is trying to use the TiP report to determine which lines his matches are from but I don't think that he is aware of how unreliable that program is. STR markers change very randomly but SNP markers are carried by all descendants. Sometimes it can take 10 generations for an STR to change or there can be two STR changes in a single generation. Sometimes people from a documented line are a closer match to a line from another son of the same patriarch. Once enough SNPs have been identified it will still take a lot of BigY tests to find conclusive matches SNPs and prove which line a person is from.

He was advised of this when he posted his story at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/22743

Armando

Comment

Here are two different examples of father-son Y-DNA testing showing the STR markers to have a GD (genetic distance) of 2 when tested out to 67 markers.

http://forums.familytreedna.com/showthread.php?t=36922

http://forums.familytreedna.com/showthread.php?t=35648

There are examples of paternal lines with a common ancestor from more than 5 generations ago without any of the STR markers changing.

So again, since STR markers change randomly, and sometimes switch back, there is no way to tell how far back the common ancestor is, other than well documented ancestry, until BigY testing becomes cheaper, commonplace, and those and/or other matches have had the BigY or a comparable test.

Armando

Comment

Mr. Ricci,

I looked at the information Armando posted and it seems to be proof that
your person and our Diego Romo De Vivar are different people. it doesn't
seem there's really any evidence to suggest he is the same person. the
stuff on the internet and google books show lots of information on our
Diego Romo De Vivar and most of them show him buying property in
Aguascalientes and Chihuahua and pacifying Indians and being at the Mines
in Durango but nothing about the inquisition. Plus your person doesn't seem
to be called Diego Romo de Vivar, he seems to be called Diego Perez de
Vivar according to Pares and this site

http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/ead-display/-/ead/pl/aicode/ES-2807…

Danny C. Alonso

It's been a while

I have updated my geneology and want to post so that we can share/discuss. How do I go about doing this?

Nicolas Contreras in Search of his IM's

Nicolas Contreras (K24M-3JQ) Mas married to Cathalina Luevana (M319-Q5D familySearch.org)

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-65T9-3RY?cc=1502404&wc=M6Q…

Comments

Comment

Simona

I've indexed/extracted many of the matrimonial investigations from Aguascalientes (everything up to about 1730; I am currently working on 1730-40) and posted them here at NR. Go to Files, Reference materials, then Aguascalientes matrimonial investigations.

These are pdf files that are searchable. You can down-load these files if you wish.

The early records are incomplete, and not in chronological order. Unfortunately, I did not find any records for Nicolas Contreras.

At some point Family Search re-posted the matrimonial investigation films, and thus the image numbers do not match the way the films are currently posted, so my index has become somewhat difficult to use.

George Fulton

Search function on Nuestros Ranchos site?

Joseph,

I remember when you first started this website, that there was a search function. Is it still available? I can't find it.

Emilie
Port Orchard, WA

Comments

Comment

Hello Emilie,

You have to sign-in to have the search box appear top right corner of the screen.

Happy searching,
Rick A Ricci

Zacatecas Newspapers

Does anyone know of any resources for archived newspapers, announcements, etc for Zacatecas ? 19th and/or 18th century ?
Thanks!

Origin of the Perez-Gallo family line in Los altos de Jalisco

Does anybody know if the Origin of the Perez-Gallo family line in Los altos de Jalisco comes from Antonio Perez Temblador and Micala (Miicaela?) Gallo?

Josepha Maria Peres Gallo
Mexico, Baptisms

Comments

Comment

That particular Juan Pérez Gallo and his wife Doña Ángela de Orozco are my 12th great grandparents. I'm familiar with his children and their children, but I don't have any further information on him or who his parents are. His wife Doña Ángela de Orozco y Velasco is the natural born daughter of Francisco de Orozco(the son of Gerónimo de Orozco and Ángela de Velasco) and Catalina de Arriola. There's a couple of dispensas that mention the Pérez Gallo in Montejano Hilton's Sagrada Mitra de Guadalajara.' But, neither show anything further for the Pérez Gallo line or for Juan Pérez Gallo. You can view the two dispensas that mention Pérez Gallo below. The first one is a Dispensa de cuarto grado de afinidad por cópula lícita and mentions the widow of Francisco de Tejeda Villaseñor, Doña María Pérez Gallo, (daughter of Juan Pérez Gallo and Doña Ángela de Orozco y Velasco). The other mentions Onofre Joseph Pérez Gallo, (grandson of Juan Pérez Gallo and Doña Ángela de Orozco y Velasco and the nephew of the Doña María Pérez Gallo) named in the first dispensa.

Christopher de Cuéllar

Teocaltiche. Jal. Enero 2 de 1717. Exp 28 - Dispensa de cuarto grado de
afinidad por cópula lícita.- Francisco de Tejeda Villaseñor. español, vecino de
este pueblo, viudo de Doña María Pérez Gallo; con Doña María Morán de Ledesma.
hija legítima de Antonio Morán de Ledesma y de Doña Antonia Ramírez de Rueda.
españoles y vecinos de esta feligresía. Declaración de Alvaro Carrillo, español
de 62 años de edad: Porque Antonio de Ibarra y Catharina de Ibarra, fueron
hermanos, y Antonio de Ibarra fué bisabuelo de Doña María Morán de Ledesma, que
conoció a María de Ibarra, abuela de la dicha y que conoce a Antonio Morán de
Ledesma, padre de la dicha María Morán de Ledesma, y conoció a Catharina de
Arriola, abuela que fué de María Pérez Gallo, e hija que fué de la dicha
Catharina de Ibarra, y que conoció a Angela de Orozco, hija de Catharina de
Arriola y madre que fué de María Pérez Gallo, mujer que fué de Francisco de
Tejeda. Se otorgó la dispensa en la Ciudad de Guadalajara. en 4 de enero de
1717. 10 fojas.

Jalostotitlán. Jal. Abril 5 de 1749. Exp. 92 - Dispensa de cuarto grado puro de
afinidad por cópula lícita.- Onofre Joseph Pérez Gallo, español de 37 años de
edad, originario de la feligresía de San Pedro Teocaltiche. y vecino de ésta de
Xalostotitlan el tiempo ha de veinte años, viudo de Doña Anna Fernández de
Rueda; con Doña María Luisa González de Hermosillo. española de 26 años de edad.
originaria y vecina de esta feligresía, hija legítima de Don Gerónimo González y
de Doña Matiana de Lomelín. Declaración de Lázaro Gutiérrez de Hermosillo.
español de 59 años de edad: Don Gerónimo González, padre de la pretensa, y Doña
Leonor Gómez, suegra del pretenso, son primos segundos tercer grado Se otorgó
la dispensa en la Ciudad de Guadalajara. en 10 de abril de 1749. 8 fojas.

Comment

Hello Christopher,

I descend from Onofre Joseph Perez Gallo (born 1712 Teocaltiche). I was stuck at his parents Jose Perez Gallo and Maria Alvarez de Nava I had copied Jaime Holcombes work on his wife Ana Fernandez de Rueda (Angela) but yesterday I found conflicting information on Ana "Angela" and will review why Jaime Holcombe provides different parents than the document that I found yesterday.

I was stuck on Onofre's parents and had only had his mother as Maria Nava when I discovered yesterday that she was also known as Maria Alvarez de Nava. You state that Onofre is the grandson of Juan Perez Gallo and Angela de. Orosco y Velasco. Then I am assuming that Jose Perez Gallo is the son of Juan Perez Gallo And Angela de Orosco y Velasco. I am confused by your statements on Francisco Orosco and Geronimo Orosco. I descend from Licenciado Francisco Tello de Orosco ( born circa 1556 ciudad de Mexico )and Ana de Carbajal y Ulloa. I have this Francisco as a son of Doctor Geronimo Orosco (Lic. y Gobernador de Nueva Galicia) and Grandson of another Geronimo Orosco. This francisco has a brother named Geronimo Miguel de Orosco married to Isabel del Castillo. Are your Geronimo and Francisco related to these people? If so, can you tell me how they are related? Where does the Velasco come from?

I have Montejano Hilton's Sagrada Mitra de Guadalajara so I am surprised to hear that it has information that I have been looking for. I have read it from cover to cover. I must have missed it. I need to go back and read the book again more carefully. It has a tremendous amount of information. I probably missed this info because I read it late at night.

Thank you so much for all your help.

Rick A Ricci

Comment

On the IM of his third marriage to Manuela Reynoso, he is listed as the legitimate son of Don Joseph Pérez Gallo and Doña María de la Nava Álvarez Tostado:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-18804-27?cc=1874591&wc…

Onofre Joseph Pérez Gallo's father Don Joseph Pérez Gallo was born in March 1685 and baptized in Nuestra Señora de los Dolores, Teocaltiche, Jalisco on 18 Mar 1685 and is the legitimate son of Juan Pérez Gallo and Ángela de Orozco y Velasco. Ángela de Orozco y Velasco is the natural born daughter of Francisco de Orozco and Catalina de Arriola. Francisco de Orozco was the son of Gerónimo de Orozco and Ángela de Velasco, that's where the Velasco comes from. This Ángela de Velasco was the daughter of Juan Ramírez de la Campaña and Francisca Temiño de Velasco. Francisca Temiño de Velasco was the daughter of Diego Flores de la Torre and Ángela de Velasco.

According to Jaime Holcombe, Gerónimo de Orozco that was married to Ángela de Velasco, descended from "Alberto de Orozco, primo hermano del señor Presidente Orozco." Dr. Gerónimo de Orozco y Lerma, Gobernador y Capitán General de la Nueva Galicia.

Christopher de Cuellar

Comment

Hello Christopher,

You saved me a lot of time and work. I was going to track down Jaime Holcombes family worksheets just to find his information on the Perez Temblador family. Many years ago I spent a lot of time going over his family group sheets. His work is so vast that it would take me. A long time to go throw all of the films. Not only that, but it was the wrong path to take.

A dispensation provides information that Lucas Alvarez Tostado Nava is the brother of Maria Nava (Maria Alvarez Tostado) if this dispensation is correct then that makes Maria Nava the daughter of Lorenzo Alvarez Tostado Nava and Juana Delgadillo (Islas)

I assume that Alberto is the son of Juan Bautista Orosco.

Juan Bautista is the only brother that came over that I know of. I will do more research. I just found another Jaime Holcomb mistake yesterday so it is important to check his work even though he compiled a tremendous amount of accurate data

Thanks again,

Rick A Ricci

Comment

Rick, you may already have this record: Joseph Perez Gallo's death records from 1741 listing his brother in law as "Lorenzo" - Maria Nava Alvarez Tostado's brother. Would you share the dispensation you have listing Maria Nava Alvares Tostado's brother as "Lucas" Alvares Tostado? I know Lorenzo and Lucas are brothers according to Family Search files.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19050-27078-94?cc=1874591&wc…

Thank you

Comment

Does anyone have a link to the marriage record of Lucas Alvarez and Polonia Fernández from 4 May 1727 in Jalostotitlán film 279295?

I was able to find the record of his second marriage in the same film from 31 August 1729 at https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18447-44-50

Comment

Las siguiente dispensas comprueban que Lorenzo, Juan, Francisco, y Antonio fueron hermanos. También comprueban que Ana Ramírez, Isabel Ramírez y Mariana Ramírez fueron hermanas hijas de Joseph Ramírez de Mendoza cc Ana Muñoz de Hermosillo

Felipe Jiménez Álvarez cc María Ana Álvarez Tostado y Romo

Dispensa 168038

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-81257-14

Tronco 1 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas (tiene el nombre correcto de María de Nava)

Tronco 2 - Joseph Ramírez de Mendoza cc Ana Muñoz de Hermosillo

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-81285-42

Juan Ramírez Enríquez cc Isabel Javiera Delgadillo y Álvarez Tostado

Dispensa 168117 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-19812-2

Tronco 1 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas

"parentesco de consanguinidad en tercer grado en dos partes por ser ambos nietos de dos hermanos que lo fueron Francisco y Juan Álvarez Tostado de los cuales Francisco casó con Ana Ramírez y Juan con Isabel Ramírez hermanas..."

Pedro Joseph Álvarez Tostado y Jiménez cc María Gertrudis Enríquez y González de Hermosillo

Dispensa 168382 13 dic 1769

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18429-43354-54

Tronco 1 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas (erróneamente los tienen como Antonio Álvarez Tostado cc Anna Muñoz de Nava) tuvieron a Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc Juana Delgadillo y Juan Álvarez Tostado cc Isabel Ramírez....

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18429-43699-4

Tronco 2 - Diego Delgadillo de Islas cc Petronila de Isla

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18429-43699-4

Joseph Alejandro Álvarez y González de Hermosillo cc Eufrasia Álvarez Tostado y González Rubio

Dispensa https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-81364-16

Tronco 1- Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas (erróneamente los tienen como Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc Isabel Calderón)

Tronco 2- Joseph Ramírez de Mendoza cc Ana Muñoz de Hermosillo

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-81673-30

Juan Manuel Ramírez Enríquez cc Josefa Feliz de Lomelín y Álvarez Tostado

Dispensa https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18403-11411-17

Tronco 1 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas

Tronco 2 - Diego Delgadillo de Islas cc Petronila de Isla

"me hallo en tercero grado de consanguinidad por ser nietos de dos hermanos que lo son Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado y Francisco Álvarez Tostado causas segunda ser nietos de dos hermanas que lo fueron Isabel de Calderon y Juan Delgadillo tubo por hija a Petronila Alvarez Tostado, Petronila tuvo hija a la pretensa Isabel de Calderon tuvo por hija a Magdalena Enríquez y Magdalena me tuvo a mí."

José Ignacio Álvarez de Lomelín cc María de la Merced Álvarez Tostado y Romo

Dispensa de 4o grado de consanguinidad y de afinidad

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-20800-83

Tronco 1 - Francisco Álvarez Tostado cc Ana María Ramírez de Mendoza Hermosillo

Tronco 2&3 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas (la dispensa erróneamente menciona a María Francisca de Nava Cuevas como Josefa Muñoz)

Tronco 4 - Joseph Ramírez de Mendoza cc Ana Muñoz de Hermosillo

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18415-20834-3

Francisco Javier Álvarez Tostado y Enríquez cc María Antonia de Lomelín y Álvarez Tostado

Dispensa de consanguinidad y afinidad - https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-21232-7

Tronco 1 - Diego Delgadillo de Islas cc Petronila de Isla

Tronco 2 - Lorenzo Álvarez Tostado cc María Francisca de Nava Cuevas

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-22068-73

Tronco 3 - Diego Delgadillo de Islas cc Petronila de Isla

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-21457-84

Comment

Jaime Holcombe did some work on the Perez temblador family. I did not copy these sheets because I did not see a connection to my family. I suspect that they may be the origin of the Perez Gallo family from Los altos de Jalisco. Does anybody have copies of Jaime Holcombes family sheets on this family? Does anyone know the film and batch numbers to these sheets so I can look them up?

Thanks,
R A Ricci

Comment

  Juan Pérez Gallo and Ángela de Orozco were already having children in Teocaltiche and Ayo El Chico in the 1670s:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-56587-84?cc=1874591&wc…
That would likely place Juan Pérez Gallo's birth around the 1650s. His parents would most likely have been born around the 1630s. Therefore, the couple baptizing a child in 1691 would be the unlikely origin of the Pérez Gallo.
Christopher de Cuéllar

Comment

Juan Pérez Gallo and Ángela de Orozco were already having children in Teocaltiche and Ayo El Chico in the 1670s:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18685-56587-84?cc=1874591&wc…
That would likely place Juan Pérez Gallo's birth around the 1650s. His parents would most likely have been born around the 1630s. Therefore, the couple baptizing a child in 1691 would be the unlikely origin of the Pérez Gallo.
Christopher de Cuéllar

Romo, Tiscareño, Richarte (Richante), Pedrajo

Hello

Found this entry,havent before come across the names Richarte and Pedrajo associated with Romo, but here it is. I can see there are some people in NR interested in the Richarte name....

Comments

Comment

There should have been a dispensa for this couple. Vicente Romo de Vivar, father of the groom, was the son of Joseph Romo de Vivar who was the son of María de Villalobos who was the daughter of Salvador de Villalobos Macías Valadez and Francisca Martín del Campo y López de la Cruz who were also the parents of Francisca Villalobos who had Juan Tiscareño the father of Maria Dolores Tiscareño.

If anyone finds the dispensa please let me know.

Apuntes para la Genealogía de la Familia Romo de Vivar en Aguascalientes

Apuntes para la Genealogía de la Familia Romo de Vivar en Aguascalientes

1600 (Circa) Diego Romo casó con Catharina de Pérez en la Parroquia de
Rielves, Toledo, España

1624 (Circa) Diego Romo de Vivar y Pérez casó con María Rangel Peguero. Sus

Comments

Comment

Hola Felipe,

Creo haber notado algunos errores en tus Apuntes para la Genealogía de la Familia Romo de Vivar en Aguascalientes. Te envío el Pedigree de Joseph Andrés Romo de Vivar, casado con María Margarita Martínez de Sotomayor, para que verifiques. Avísame si necesitas alguna información adicional.

Saludos,
Guillermo Figueroa Strecker

Comment

Apreciados John y Bill:

He revisado las fuentes originarias de mi estudio y son correctas. probablemente están Ustedes considerando la existencia de los homónimos. Ese no es mi objeto de estudio. Confirmo lo siguiente:

1. Diego Romo
Matrimonio: Catalina Pérez
Padres de: 2. Diego Romo De Vivar

2. Diego Romo De Vivar
Nacimiento: 12 Marzo de 1589. Rielves, España
Matrimonio: María Rangel (Peguero)
Padres de: 3. Diego Romo de Vivar
Defunción: 19 June 1659 Aguascalientes México

3. Diego Romo De Vivar
Matrimonio: Luisa De Los Reyes y Ángeles
Padres de: 4.Nicolas Romo De Vivar

4. Capitán Nicolás Romo De Vivar
Bautizo: 11 de Septiembre de 1656 en Aguascalientes, México
Matrimonio: 12 Febrero de 1684 en Aguascalientes, con María Villalobos
Padres de: 5. José Andrés Romo De Vivar
Defunción: 8 de Diciembre de 1714

5. José Andrés Romo De Vivar
Bautizo: 25 de Abril de 1709
Matrimonio celebrado el 1734 en Pabellón,con María Margarita Martínez De Sotomayor

Véanse las coincidencias de mi estudio con el realizado por Erika Peacock (Aportado el 7 de Noviembre de 2008. Consular en: http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/17268

In reply to by Felipe Reyes Romo

Comment

Felipe,

The posts dont match. which one is right

Danny C. Alonso

2015-09-16 17:56 GMT-07:00 :

> Apreciados John y Bill: He revisado las fuentes originarias de mi estudio y
> son correctas. probablemente están Ustedes considerando la existencia de
> los
> homónimos. Ese no es mi objeto de estudio. Confirmo lo siguientes: 1. Diego
> Romo Nacimiento: Circa 1560 ? Matrimonio: Catalina Pérez Padres de: 2.
> Diego
> Romo De Vivar 2. Diego Romo De Vivar Nacimiento: 12 Marzo de 1589. Rielves,
> España Matrimonio: María Rangel (Peguero) Padres de: 3. Diego Romo de Vivar
> Defunción: 19 June 1659 Aguascalientes México 3. Diego Romo De Vivar
> Matrimonio: Luisa De Los Reyes y Ángeles Padres de: 4.Nicolas Romo De Vivar
> 4. Capitán Nicolás Romo De Vivar Bautizo: 11 de Septiembre de 1656 en
> Aguascalientes, México Matrimonio: 12 Febrero de 1684 en Aguascalientes,
> con
> María Villalobos Padres de: 5. José Andrés Romo De Vivar Defunción: 8 de
> Diciembre de 1714 5. José Andrés Romo De Vivar Bautizo: 25 de Abril de 1709
> Matrimonio celebrado el 1734 en Pabellón,con María Margarita Martínez De
> Sotomayor Véanse las coincidencias del estudio realizado por Erica_Peacock
> (Posteado el 7 de Noviembre de 2008. Consular en :
> http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/17268
>

In reply to by dcalonso

Comment

Hi Felipe,
Danny is right, although your original post and your Refutación farther down the thread are written at much different times, neither of them match in their ancestry of José Andrés Romo de Vivar. Your first post mentions that Nicolás Romo de Vivar married María Martínez de Villalobos, who you list as the daughter of Nicolás de Villalobos and Theresa Carrillo. You also list this Nicolás Romo de Vivar as the son of Diego Romo de Vivar and Lorenza Ruiz de Esparza. Then farther down in your Refutación you list the parents of the same Nicolás Romo de Vivar as Diego Romo de Vivar and Luisa de los Reyes y Ángeles. Both posts are actually incorrect.

Your José Andrés Romo de Vivar is the son of Captain Nicolás Romo de Vivar ( son of Pedro Romo de Vivar and Lorenza Ruiz de Esparza) and María López de la Cruz aka María de Villalobos ( daughter of Salvador de Villalobos and Francisca López de la Cruz). Both parents are actually mentioned in their marriage on 12 Feb 1684: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-12446-30210-44?cc=1502404&…

The confusion comes from the fact that there are two Nicolás Romo de Vivar's(first cousins to each other) married to two similarly named girls -María de Villalobos and Mariana de Villalobos(also, first cousins to each other). I believe this has been explained before by Bill Figueroa and Armando.

Diego Romo de Vivar and Luisa de los Reyes y Ángeles, as well as, Nicolás de Villalobos and Theresa Carrillo that your posts mention are the parents of Nicolás Romo de Vivar and "Mariana de Villalobos" who married three years later and are not the parents of your ancestor: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19050-64295-99?cc=1874591&wc…

Christopher de Cuellar

In reply to by iChristopher

Comment

Estimado Felipe,
Tienen toda la razón Bill y Christopher y no comprendo por qué piensas que los padres de Nicolás Romo de Vivar fueron Diego Romo de Vivar y Luisa de Los Reyes y Ángeles cuando citaste la fecha correcta. El registro de esa fecha tiene los padres correctos de Nicolás Romo de Vivar y María Villalobos. ¿Ya revisaste los registros usando los enlaces que aportó Christopher? ¿Ya notaste que los padres de tus ancestros no son los que apuntaste en tu ultimo mensaje?

Por si te falta mas evidencia, María de Villalobos nunca es mencionada como Mariana o María Ana en los registros de bautisimo o los registros de matrimonio de sus hijos en Aguascalientes. Mariana o María Ana tuvo sus hijos en Teocaltiche y no en Aguascalientes.

Te paso los bautismos y matrimonios de los hijos de Nicolás Romo de Vivar y de María de Villalobos y algunos otros documentos que comprueban que María nunca usó el nombre Mariana o María Ana.

1. Juana
Bautismo 26 de mayo de 1686 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-138239-47?cc=1502404…
IM https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11044-17184-58?cc=1410092&…

2. Catarina
Bautismo 12 de enero de 1698 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-138419-45?cc=1502404…
Matrimonio https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-13029-91660-96?cc=1502404&…
Dispensa en que se menciona Catarina y sus abuelos maternos Salvador de Villalobos y Francisca Martin del Campo
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18419-3784-52

3. Francisca
Bautismo 17 de julio de 1689 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-140700-70?cc=1502404

4. Pedro
Bautismo 15 de junio de 1691 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18409-54059-29?cc=1874591&wc…

Aspirante a ordenes donde se menciona sus abuelos paternos como Pedro Romo de Vivar y los maternos como Salvador de Villalobos y Francisca Martín del Campo.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18409-53326-41

5. Salvador (mismo nombre que su abuelo materno). Su madre es mencionada como María Martínez de Villalobos porque el abuelo materno de María fue Martín del Campo.

Nació alrededor de 1693
IM https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11132-148076-4

6. Monica Lorenza
Bautismo 15 de mayo de 1696 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-138927-50?cc=1502404…
IM https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11627-19844-1?cc=1502404&w…

7. Antonio (ha de haber fallecido antes de 1713)
Bautismo 22 de julio de 1698 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-137714-51?cc=1502404

8. Agustina (ha de haber fallecida antes de 1713)
Bautismo 19 de sep de 1700 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11928-140838-25?cc=1502404

9. Alexo o Alejo
Bautismo 3 de agosto de 1704 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-13033-26920-95

Dispensa en que esta mencionado como hermano de Joseph Romo de Vivar padre de Vicente Romo de Vivar. En la imagen 63 el tercer testigo dice que fueron hijos de Nicolás Romo de Vivar
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-18951-87?cc=1874591

Solicitud de ordenes menores de un hijo de Alejo que menciona a los abuelos paternos como Nicolás Romo y María de Villalobos. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18378-40732-8

10. Joseph (quien muchos mencionan como Andrés pero no hay ningún registro que lo menciona con el nombre de Andrés)
Bautismo 25 de abril de 1709 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-13033-24624-2
Matrimonio 7 de mar de 1734 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11605-23038-98

Dispensa en que esta mencionado como hermano de Alejo Romo y padre de Vicente
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-19416-75

Dispensa en que esta mencionado como hermano de Nicolás Romo y padre de Vicente
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-36216-65

Según fue enterrado 12 de febrero 1778 en Rincón de Romos pero no busqué el documento.

11. Brigida Romo

12. Petra Romo

13. Nicolás Romo (bautizado como Maximo). Nació después del testamento de su padre.
Bautismo 17 de junio de 1714 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-13033-27034-78
Matrimonio 23 de febrero de 1748 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19052-57021-94

Testamento de Nicolás esposo de María de Villalobos
6 de noviembre de 1713
Se puede ver en http://sigue.aguascalientes.gob.mx/AXWeb/Login.aspx

usuario:sigue.publica contraseña: publica

Menciona a los hijos legítimos y herederos que son Juana, Catarina, Francisca, Pedro, Salvador, Monica, Alejo, Joseph, Brigida, y Petra. Antonio y Agustina han de haber fallecido antes del testamento de 1713 y Nicolás hijo nació después del testamento.

Entierro de Nicolás esposo de María de Villalobos

8 de diciembre 1714 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11773-147106-59

Comment

Hola Felipe:

Un comentario sobre tus apuntes para la genealogia de la familia Romo de
Vivar de Aguascalientes, por favor no lo tomes a mal.

Te parece buena idea incluir las fuentes de información de cada individuo?
Aunque casi estoy seguro que usaste datos de la Iglesia LDS...
Se faciliataría mas la verificación de tus apuntes si incluyes tus fuentes.

Por ahí leí que "Genealogia sin documentación es Mitología"

John Gonzalez
Wildomar, CA.
1gnzlz@verizon.net

===============================================================================================================

----- Original Message -----
From: "felipe reyes"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 4:43 PM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Apuntes para la Genealogía de la Familia Romo de
Vivar en Aguascalientes

Apuntes para la Genealogía de la Familia Romo de Vivar en Aguascalientes

1600 (Circa) Diego Romo casó con Catharina de Pérez en la Parroquia de
Rielves, Toledo, España

1624 (Circa) Diego Romo de Vivar y Pérez casó con María Rangel Peguero. Sus
hijos fueron: Joseph; Maria; Juan casó con María de Tiscareño; Isabel;
Antonia; Pedro casó con Lorenza Ruiz de Esparza; Jerónimo casó con
Margarita de Tiscareño; Antonio, Francisco, que casó con Lorenza Ruiz de
Esparza; Diego Romo de Vivar Rangel

1633 Diego Romo de Vivar casó con Lorenza Ruiz de Esparza. Sus hijos fueron:
Nicolás, Luis, Beatriz, Juan, Baltasar, José y Sebastián

1677 Nicolás Romo de Vivar casó con María Martínez de Villalobos que era
hija de Nicolás de Villalobos y Theresa Carrillo. Sus hijos fueron: Joseph
Andrés, Alexo, Pedro, Petra, Brígida y Nicolás

1734 Joseph Andrés Romo de Vivar y Martínez de Villalobos casó con María
Margarita Martínez de Sotomayor, que era hija de Lucas Martínez de Sotomayor
y Theresa Esparza Flores. Sus hijos fueron: Francisca y Vicente

1755 (Circa) Vicente Romo de Vivar y Martínez casó con Maria Josefa
Pedrajo: sus hijos fueron: Joseph Manuel,

1792 Joseph Manuel Romo de Vivar Pedrajo casó con Dolores Tiscareño. Sus
hijos fueron: José-María-Atanasio-Ramón, José-Ramón-Francisco de Paula,
José- Luis-de la Trinidad, José-Luciano-Ramón, José María-Hipólito

1821 Francisco Ignacio Romo de Vivar y Tiscareño casó con Josefa Casilda
Lozano: sus hijos fueron: Jacinto,

1849 Jacinto Romo de Vivar Lozano casó con su prima hermana Josefa Lozano.
Sus hijos fueron: Manuela, María Petra, José Conrado, Jesús Bonifacio, María
,Francisco Cirilo, Joaquin.

1869 Jesús Bonifacio Romo de Vivar casó con Micaela Romo de Vivar. Sus Hijos
fueron: Francisca, Jacinto, José María, Ignacio, Agustín, José Refugio,
Alejandro, Josefa, Matilde, Dolores y María.

1900 Alejandro Romo de Vivar y Romo de Vivar casó con María teresa González
López de Nava. Sus hijos fueron; Javier, Alejandro, José, Enrique, Samuel,
Miguel, Ester, Teresa, Manuel y Cleotilde

1918 Miguel Romo González casó con Felipa Espino Tiscareño, hija de José H.
Espino y Carmen Tiscareño Escárcega. Sus hijos son: Alicia, Delia, Noemí,
Miguel y Raquel.

1939 Alicia Romo Espino casó con José Antonio reyes González: Sus hijos son:
Blanca Alicia, Clara Adelina, Gloria Helena, Juan Antonio, Felipe,
Elizabeth, Miguel Ezequiel, Norma Adriana y Ana Gabriela.

Felipe Reyes Romo. Actualización al 4 de Febrero de 2007

_________________________________________________________________

In reply to by gnzlzspd

Comment

The idea that the ancestor of the Romis de Vivar was an inquisitor throws a curveball into the accepted lineage by most genealogists as the only diego Romo de Vivar, from this time frame, that I have confirmed to be an inquisitor has different parents. The other curveball into the accepted lineage is that Guiellermo Teresa de Tovar claimed to have much evidence of the identity of the parents of Maria Rangel Peguero.

With both Diego Romo de Vivar and Maria Rangel de Pegueros parents identity being questioned, the possibility arises that we have repeatedly accepted genealogies as proven when maybe it's time to go back and reexamine all the information on these people.

I am deeply involved in research in other areas so I cannot revisit the ancestry of this couple at this time. However, I no longer feel comfortable naming the parents of Diego Romo de Vivar and Maria Rangel Peguero as being confirmed. Especially since the older genealogy books clearly state that Diego was an official of the Inquisition.

R A Ricci

In reply to by gnzlzspd

Comment

The idea that the ancestor of the Romis de Vivar was an inquisitor throws a curveball into the accepted lineage by most genealogists as the only diego Romo de Vivar, from this time frame, that I have confirmed to be an inquisitor has different parents. The other curveball into the accepted lineage is that Guiellermo Teresa de Tovar claimed to have much evidence of the identity of the parents of Maria Rangel Peguero.

With both Diego Romo de Vivar and Maria Rangel de Pegueros parents identity being questioned, the possibility arises that we have repeatedly accepted genealogies as proven when maybe it's time to go back and reexamine all the information on these people.

I am deeply involved in research in other areas so I cannot revisit the ancestry of this couple at this time. However, I no longer feel comfortable naming the parents of Diego Romo de Vivar and Maria Rangel Peguero as being confirmed. Especially since the older genealogy books clearly state that Diego was an official of the Inquisition.

R A Ricci

Araiza y Medina, del Castillo, de Gusman, Gomes

Estimados Miembros del Foro:

Comments

Comment

Sergio, ¿haz logrado obtener mayor información? ¿tienes datos de quienes son los padres de María Antonia de Zambrano y María Antonia Martínez? Tengo entendido que una hija de Sebastián de Guzmán, Antonia Manuela Guzmán, casó el 11 de mayo de 1783 en Tuxcacuesco, Jalisco, con Juan Rafael Villa y Alcaraz. De esa línea desciendo yo. Saludos.

Yaomautzin Olvera

In reply to by Villamichel

Comment

Hola Yaomautzin,

Te tengo un poco m[as de informacion:

Sebastian de Guzman y Maria Antonia Martinez casaron el 21 de Nov de 1757. Tengo transcrita el acta, pero parece queno guarde el link. Tengo la imagen si la quieres, pero segun recuerdo los documentos de Amacueca estaban bien organizados.
"En veinte y un dias de el mes de Nove. de stecient. y cinq.ta. y siete añ en este Pueb.o de Amac.a se casaron, y velaron in facie Ecce Sebastian Gusman Español orig.o. de el Pueb.o de Autlan, y vezo. de el de Sayula, y María Antt.a Martinez orig.a y vez.a de este ___ de Amac.a Española; haviendo presedido las deligens. que ordena y manda el Sto. Concilio de Trento principalm.te en amonestarlos en tres días festivos inter missaru solemnia assi en esta Parrochia como en la de Sayula, y no resultando impedim.to pasé a celebrar dho. Matrim. con licencia de el Parrocho de dho. pretenso ____ Padrinos Ignacio Martinez, y María Gertrudis Contreras. assistie___ a el tiempo de celebración de testigos Augustin Franco, Ju de Sto. Pedro, y Mig.l. Madrueño, y para que conste lo firmé, dho, dias, mes, y año us supra.
Fr. Jn de Avila"

Maria Antonia Martinez fue hija de Juan Martinez y de Anna Maria Martinez, nacio en 1741 parece que en Sayula y fallecio el 9 de Nov 1778 en Tuxcacuesco. No tengo mas informacion sobre ellos.

Sobre Maria Antonia de Zambrano si tengo mas informacion, pero no tengo ahorita tiempo de escribirlo. Soolo dire por ahora que nacio en 1702 en Tuxcacuesco. Encontre a sus cuatro abuelos. Te los mando pronto. Lo que no he encontrado es su defuncion.

Tambien debo corregir un par de datos que puse en mi intervencion anterior pues he encontrado mas informacion sobre Sebastian y sobre Santos Guzman.

Saludos prima!

Sergio Salés

In reply to by ssales1984

Comment

Hola Sergio, igual que tú ando apurado con los tiempos porque ya entré a clases y es el primer semestre que me toca ir al hospital. En fin, dí una checada rápida a los nuevos posts y quiero decirte que los padres de Juan de Araiza y Medina casado con María del Castillo son Juan de Araiza y Medina y María de Isla. Gracias a la dispensa que nos dio a conocer nuestro amigo Ramirez (no recuerdo su nombre pero ese el de usuario) y ésta: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-5066-5?cc=1874591&wc=M…
Ya se había publicado en un foro anterior y creo que ya la habías visto, en ella se menciona a Gertrudis de Araiza esposa de Pedro de Aguilar y Solórzano como hermana del Juan de Araiza casado con María del Castillo.

Sobre los Zambrano también estoy conectado, me parece que tu antepasada María Antonia de Zambrano (bau. 21 de Diciembre de 1902 en Sayula) es la hermana de mi antepasada Ignacia Francisca de Zambrano y Munguía nacida en 1704 y fallecida en 1744, que casó con Antonio García de Alba y Gómez-García. Existe una dispensa que obtuvieron para contraer matrimonio en cuarto grado de consanguineidad. Que es esta:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-11187-10?cc=1874591&wc…
El nombre de los padres de Ignacia fue Francisco de Zambrano y Sebastiana de Munguía y Villela. Hace tiempo antes de haber perdido algunos datos había conectado a Francisco con un Zambrano Sayago casado con una Olmedo según recuerdo como sus padres debido a que Francisco lo llegué a ver en alguna acta como Zambrano Sayago. Y de Sebastiana no recuerdo si llegué a confirmar la identidad de sus padres. Mencionas en tu comentario que pudiste saber el nombre de los cuatro abuelos de María Antonia por lo que te agradecería si pudieras pasarme esa información y si tienes alguna pista de los bisabuelos. Igualmente con la dispensa que te proporciono quizás te sirva para sacar nuevas conclusiones dado el parentesco que refieren los pretensos y a que se conocen la mayoría de los bisabuelos de Antonio García de Alba y Gómez-García. Por lo que sacar el parentesco con la información que tu tengas será aún más sencillo.

Gracias por tus aportaciones.
Enrique Agraz

Comment

Hola Enrique y Yaomautzin,

Sobre los Zambrano tengo lo siguiente:
Efectivamente los padres de María Antonia de Zambrano fueron Francisco de Zambrano y Sebastiana de Mungía y Villela. Francisco fue bautizado el 23 de abril de 1673 en Sayula

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18576-42849-56?cc=1874591&wc…

Los padres de María Antonia fueron Nicolás de Zambrano y Margarita de Rivera sobre quienes no he encontrado más información. Desafortunadamente los matrimonios en Sayula parecen empezar en 1708, demasiado tarde para encontrar el matrimonio de Nicolás y Margarita.

Sebastiana de Munguía y Villela fue bautizada el 22 Sep 1677 en Tamazula de Gordiano. Fue hija de Christobal de Munguía y de Justina María Villela. Lo que no he encontrado es la imagen, porque la hoja de Septiembre de 1677 no están donde debe estar en el libro parroquial. Tendremos que buscar imagen por imagen. Por lo pronto yo pondría los padres de Sebastiana como probables, pero no seguros.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/J9PD-1V5

Pero cuando la estaba buscando hoy me topé con la siguiente imagen que nos puede dar algunas pistas sobre la familia.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18572-54746-5?cc=1874591&wc=…

Es el bautizo el 13 Ago 1687 de Juana Lopez, hija de Andres Lopez y Magdalenda de la Aguila, a quienes no conozco, pero los padrinos son el Capitán Gerónimo Mungía Da. Inés Galindo Ruiz. Inés puede que sea pariente de Mariana Ruiz Galindo esposa de Diego Gonzalez Corona.

Las hijas que tengo para Francisco de Zambrano y Sebastiana de Mungía y Villela fueron:
a)Efigenia de Zambrano , bautizada 14 Abr 1701 en Sayula y quien casó con Joseph de Santana el 3 Ago 1719 en Tuxcacuesco. Enrique, me parece que es de aquí donde sacaste lo Sayago.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/NYTG-PQN
b) María Antonia, bautizada el 21 de diciembre pero nacida el 6 de diciembre de 1702
c)No sabía yo de Ignacia Francisca de Zambrano, bautizada el 13 de dic 1704 en Sayula.

¡Ándale, Enrique, lo de Sayago acaba de ayudarnos mucho. Parece que Nicolás de Zambrano casó el 27 de abril de 1670 en Guadalajara con Margarita de Ribera y Olmedo! ¿Es a este documento al que te referías?

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/JCDF-N9H

¡Tengo que irme a estudiar medicina, pero ahorita no quiero, quiero buscar ese documento!

Saludos cordiales,

Sergio Salés

Comment

Hola Enrique y colegas,

Aquí te va otra pieza del rompecabezas de nuestra ascendencia, esta sobre la línea de los Zambrano. En el índice de Capellanías de Katy Brecht Quesada, encontré este recibo de pago que hace referencia a Nicolás de Zambrano [Zayago], padre de Francisco de Zambrano y Rivera. Nos da dos puntos de información:
1) Parece ser que Nicolás era dueño de la hacienda de Amatitán en la jurisdicción de Sayula for 1689.
2) 2) Nicolás aún vivía cuando el documento fue escrito en 1689. Esto nos da una fecha muy posterior a la que teníamos para el curso de su vida. Habrá muerto pues después de 1689.

Aquí está el link: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18402-56537-97?cc=1874591&wc…

Muchos saludos,
Sergio

Comment

Hola Sergio:

Muchas gracias por la información que proporcionaste de Nicolás de Zambrano, te felicito por tu arduo trabajo. Espero puedas ver un post que publiqué el día de ayer con muchos datos nuevos sobre los Araiza y Medina y los Guzmán.

Saludos,
Enrique Agraz

Comment

Yo tengo dos ramas de Zambrano de Michoacan, de donde son tu familia?

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago "El Euforia".

2015-09-20 18:35 GMT+00:00 :

> Hola Sergio: Muchas gracias por la información que proporcionaste de
> Nicolás de Zambrano, te felicito por tu arduo trabajo. Espero puedas ver un
> post que publiqué el día de ayer con muchos datos nuevos sobre los Araiza y
> Medina y los Guzmán. Saludos, Enrique Agraz
>

In reply to by Villamichel

Comment

Hola Ayaomautzin,

Solamente tengo el link de la informacion, del matrimonio de Juan Rafael Villa con Antonia Manuela Guzman mas no la imagen. El archivo de Tuxcacuesco esta desorganizado, por lo que hay que buscar imagen por imagen. Me costo trabajao encontrar el matrimonio de Sebastian con Maria Antonia Martinez.

Pero te animo a que busques. Aunque esta desorganizado, creo que esta bastante completo.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/JHKT-FCK

Sergio Salés

Comment

Moises Sánchez López, Mis investigaciones han llegado hasta Juan de Araiza quien por cierto murió en 1665,desde luego que estoy dispuesto a compartir toda la información disponible, pues, aprovecho para opinar que ésta no es de ninguna manera patrimonio de nadie en especial y menos para ser guardada en algún baúl, sería éste un pensamiento muy pobre por no decir otra cosa!En mi persona llevo los genes de Araiza y pienso que eso no me hace ni menos ni más que nadie ya que de ningun modo soy responsable de eso, pero si lo soy de darlo a conocer para asi llegar al conocimiento de la Historia y sus satisfacciones.

Locating a "libro reservado" in baptismal records, Asuncion de Maria, Aguascalientes

In reviewing the digital copy of an indexed baptism, the priest indicated that the names of the parents and the grandparents paternos and maternos were located in the "libro reservado," Checking sever

Comments

Comment

I'm wondering if it would be quicker to write a letter to the parish priest at Asuncion de Maria to inquire about the libro reservado. You can easily find the addesss on Google.

Comment

Hi Renee,
I don't know what a libro reservado is, but, the record you're looking for is here:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11811-103746-23?cc=1502404…

Jose Pedro is listed as being born in Rancho de la Trinidad, hijo legitimo de D. Francisco Luebano y de Da. Cleofas Prieto. Abuelos Paternos, D. Mateo Luebano y de Da. Manuela Moreno. Abuelos Maternos, D. Santiago Prieto y de Da. Gertrudis Castaneda. Padrinos, D. Jose Maria Perez y de Da. Petronila Esparza.

You mention a discrepancy with the surname of Da. Gertrudis Castaneda, but, do not mention the discrepancy. I'm guessing that she also uses the surname Lopez, which, is the last name of her mother, Michaela Lopez.

Christopher de Cuellar

Comment

Thank you Christopher. That is the record I sought, it appears to have been entered twice, once with the family and once without - hard to believe I read right over that entry on the proceeding page. The discrepancy was exactly as you state, Da. Gertrudis Castaneda was identified as Da. Gertrudis Lopez. I'm hoping that you are related to this family, since you knew that Lopez was the name of her mother MIcaela, yes?
Thank you for your help.

Renée Capels

Comment

Thank you Christopher. That is the record I sought, it appears to have been entered twice, once with the family and once without - hard to believe I read right over that entry on the proceeding page. The discrepancy was exactly as you state, Da. Gertrudis Castaneda was identified as Da. Gertrudis Lopez. I'm hoping that you are related to this family, since you knew that Lopez was the name of her mother MIcaela, yes?
Thank you for your help.

Renée Capels

Comment

Hi Renee,

No, I'm not related to this family. I just looked at the marriage of D. Santiago Prieto and Da. Gertrudis Castaneda, so it was just a guess that she was going to use her mother's last name of Lopez, although, she could've also used her grandmother's name of Esparza too. Actually, I just looked and there is a Gertrudis Esparza married to a Santiago Prieto, so, that's probably also the same person as Gertrudis Castaneda.

Chris

    

Comment

I'm wondering if it would be quicker to write a letter to the parish priest at Asuncion de Maria to inquire about the libro reservado. You can easily find the addesss on Google.

Escrituras/Tierras 1691 - 1735

I was at the LDS Center tonight and finished reviewing the remainder of the microfilm number 0169054.

Comments

Comment

Can you give me some reference to the Santiago. This is what i have so far,http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/23069-
itzcoatzin@gmail.com
Phone 5622483339 I am in California USA.

En 1800, la Hacienda de la Encarnación tenía 33 sitios de Ganado Mayor, uno de Menor y dos Caballerías. Linda esta Hacienda con la Hacienda de Palomas y de Tayahua, la primera de Don José de la Borda y la segunda de Don Ventura de Arteaga, tiene al poniente la Hacienda del Salto de los herederos de Don Juan Martínez, la Hacienda del Huacasco de la Obra Pía de la Quemada y con los naturales de Colotlán, al sur, con la Hacienda de Santiago de la Laguna y con la de Juana Catic de Ordóñez del Bachiller José Barragán y socios y por el norte con el sitio de Ciénega de Morones que fue de Don José Ibarrola del ojo negro de los herederos de Juan de Zúñiga Fajardo y de los fuertes. Beltrán y Juan Tarasco, que se dicen de Doña María Prudencia del Río.

E

Comment

Here is the list of Escrituras/Tierras with microfilm numbers. I finished reviewing the first one microfilm number 169054:

https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/130728?availability=Family%20Hi…

I may be interested in looking at the next two 169055 (1729 - 1778) and 169056 (1700 - 1715). But I want to look at 169056 first to see if I can find my GGGGGGG Grandfather Antonio Madera that passed away sometime before 1709 of Minillas, Mezquitic, Jalisco

Comment

Thank you for that link. I'm a descendant of Francisco Martín Gallardo, the
son of Francisco Martín Gallardo and Teresa de Rodas. married to Catalina
Manrique de Guzmán on 5 November 1645 in Irapuato through their son don
José Martín Gallardo married to Teresa Camacho Riquelme. They had a
daughter Catalina Guzmán Gallardo born in Jalostotitlán that married Miguel
Moreno de Ortega from Lagos de Moreno for which they received a dispensa 26
December 1697. The genealogy of the Martín-Gallardo family is in *Retoños
de España en La Nueva Galicia* Tomo VI volumen 1.

Teresa de Rodas was the daughter of Benito Martín from Galicia, Spain and
founder of Irapuato and Teresa de Rodas, from from Trujillo, Cáceres,
Extremadura. Spain, daughter of Francisco Solano Calderón and Francisca
Jiménez Altamirano.

Francisco Martín Gallardo and Teresa de Rodas were also the parents of
Nicolás Gallardo de Rodas who married Juana Rincón de Ortega on 2 February
1650 in Irapuato , Guanajuato. Juana Rincón de Ortega inherited Ciénega de
Mata one of the largest haciendas in México situated just north of Lagos de
Moreno. The children of this family used the surname Rincón Gallardo. There
is a nice article on the family and Ciénega de Mata at
http://bibliotecadigital.ilce.edu.mx/sites/estados/libros/aguas/html/se…
which includes maps that show that the hacienda included parts of what are
now Jalisco, Aguascalientes, Guanajuato, and Zacatecas.

Armando

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, wrote:

> Out of curiosity I looked up those names in the internet and found "Pedro
> Antonio Gallardo" of the year 1696:
>
> http://encarnacionzacatecas.blogspot.com/2006/11/la-
> hacienda-de-encarnacion-de-zacatecas.html

Transportation of "Giant Indio" Antonio Cano 1792 on ship Santa Agueda

There was a "Giant Indio" by the name of Antonio Cano that was transported on the ship "Santa Agueda" in 1792 and he was described as "Antonio Cano que tiene una extraordinaria y gigantesca estatura"

Comments

Jose Leon de Pena=Maria Juana Soto

Seeking informaron about my maternal 6th grandparents. Jose Leon de Pena was born abt. 1709; and Juana Maria Soto abt. 1701. Both deceased bef. 08 Nov 176. Thank you.

Comments

To Find Don Fernando Campa y Cos "Pasajero" document in archives

I am trying to find when Don Fernando De La Campa y Cos traveled by ship to Nuevo Espana (Mexico).

Comments

Comment

Search techniques:

In the Pars website I would try searching for:

"Pasajero" gives me a list of individual names of passengers that traveled on the Pasajero de Indias (Americas).

"Pasajeros" with an "s" gives me lists of ships that include passengers lists. These are nice to look at because it starts out with name of the ship and the Capitan. Then it has a list of names of people on the ship and sometimes with a brief description of each person where they are going.

Now since I want to look for Don Fernando De La Campa y Cos, who is from Burgos.

I had the idea of doing a search for:

"Pasajeros Burgos" So it gives me lists of people that were from Burgos that traveled to the Americas.

For example I searched for "pasajero burgos" and got list of people who were from Burgos. I filtered by years. This one is a document of 86 pages and it is people that went to Zacatecas in the year 1682. Here is the first page where it says they were to travel on the "Nuestra Senora De La Soledad" ship in the year 1682:

http://oi58.tinypic.com/16ldauo.jpg

The reference no. to use to look at it in pars website: CONTRATACION,5445,N.1,R.39

Juan Alonso de los Inojos & Isabel Ramirez

Can anyone tell me whether the names of the parents of Isabel Ramirez appears in the marriage record of Juan Alonso de los Inojos, son of Pedro Alonso de los Inojos and Ana Domingues, with Isabel Rami

Comments

Comment

Austin, thank you. I spent all night looking for it and was about to give
up.

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Hello Nuestros Ranchos Forum,

Does anyone in the Forum know where the baptism of Isabel Ramirez is? She's
the daughter of Capt. Luis Lopez Ramirez and Catalina Rubio. It's in Family
Search that she was baptized on July 2nd 1628. But it doesn't look like
it's there. Has anyone found it yet? It should be around this page:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18576-10996-15?cc=1874591&wc…

But it doesn't look like it's there.

Name Ysabel Lopez Rubio
Gender Female
Christening Date 02 Jul 1628
Christening Place SANTA MARIA DE LOS
LAGOS,LAGOS DE MORENO,JALISCO,MEXICO
Father's Name Luis Lopez
Mother's Name Catalina Rubio

Danny C. Alonso

Comment

Here's a clue, Juan Alonso de los Hinojos and Isabel Ramirez had a
son named Juan Alonso de los Hinojos baptized 25 Jul 1664 in Aguascalientes.
Prior to this Juan there was another, probably died young, only this Juan
is specifically baptized as Juan Ramirez baptized 17 May 1655 in Aguascalientes.
They gave this Juan Ramirez although his father was also Juan maybe this is
a clue. Have you tried informacion matrimonial?
Daniel